Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus-layer Call 99 #667

Closed
djrtwo opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

Consensus-layer Call 99 #667

djrtwo opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 9 comments

Comments

@djrtwo
Copy link
Collaborator

djrtwo commented Nov 17, 2022

Consensus-layer Call 99 Agenda

prev: call 98

Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2022/12/1 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
livestream

  1. Capella
  2. 4844
    • any updates worth percolating up to the larger call
    • KZG ceremony update
  3. Research, spec, etc
  4. Open Discussion/Closing Remarks
@AgeManning
Copy link

AgeManning commented Nov 28, 2022

If there's time, can we discuss potentially releasing some backwards compatible changes:

  • Reduction in nodes per long-lived subnet: Proposed attnets revamp consensus-specs#2749
    This can be released entirely in a backwards compatible way, but the net result will be less nodes on long-lived subnets. There is a constant (SUBNETS_PER_NODE) that we can set to minimize the impact on the transition.
  • Ipv6 dual-stack support. We've been working towards enabling this throughout all our protocols. First step is enabling ipv6 on our bootnodes which gives an entry-point for ipv6 compatible nodes to connect and advertise ipv6 support. This is also backwards compatible.

Not to be released, but discuss some ideas/work towards automatic NAT hole punching, which may also help finding extra nodes on long-lived subnets.

@mkalinin
Copy link
Contributor

As a follow up to my recent comment ethereum/beacon-APIs#226 (comment), I would like to give an overview on Checkpoint Sync API status.

@OisinKyne
Copy link

Hi all,

I'd like a few minutes to introduce this proposal ethereum/beacon-APIs#224 to the teams if possible :)

@mkalinin
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to go over Engine API spec improvement proposal, discussion points:

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

I'd like to revisit this PR: ethereum/consensus-specs#3095

that adds a bound to the sweep over the validator set per block

This is the last open question on the spec so I'd like to reach agreement on merging or not; if you want to track general progress, you can check out this document: https://notes.ethereum.org/LqHDfmQdS96KWgs3UzGeyA

@tvanepps
Copy link
Collaborator

tvanepps commented Dec 1, 2022

I'd like to mention the KZG Ceremony briefly just to build awareness as we wrap up the second audit and move towards the public contribution period!

@benjaminion
Copy link

Call notes.

@hanabi62513
Copy link

hanabi62513 commented Feb 26, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants