-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Executable fork choice #1185
Executable fork choice #1185
Conversation
* dev: Fix #1173 attestations: check shard, and check epoch earlier
There's no good reason to make |
* dev: Increase historical length and cleanups (#1196)
hold up on my review before merge |
Co-Authored-By: Hsiao-Wei Wang <[email protected]>
This needs a little bit of work wrt issues in #768. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor comments. The bulk of the substance of my review is found in #1198
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed on merging this PR before #1198 to divide out the restructuring from modifications of handling state.
This is a new PR which supersedes the old executable fork choice PR #1068. This was done because
dev
is so far ahead of the branch that #1068 was forked from so it was easier to start again.Special thanks to @hwwhww and @vbuterin for the help tracking down a stupid bug.