Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce Deneb to remove EIP-4844 references #289

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 2, 2023

Conversation

rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator

Consensus-spec references may need to be fixed once deneb is renamed in that project.

related to ethereum/consensus-specs#3207

jimmygchen and others added 3 commits December 25, 2022 18:04
Consensus-spec references may need to be fixed once deneb is renamed in that project.

related to ethereum/consensus-specs#3207
mcdee
mcdee previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2023
@jimmygchen
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rolfyone thanks for this - is this PR ready to be merged?

@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rolfyone commented Feb 7, 2023

Hi @rolfyone thanks for this - is this PR ready to be merged?

won't be able to merge it until we've done the capella release...

@rolfyone rolfyone dismissed stale reviews from ghost and mcdee via 09ca1dd February 8, 2023 00:24
…this back to bellatrix transactions like the other similar references.
@Inphi
Copy link

Inphi commented Apr 5, 2023

any updates on this? Are we still waiting on a Capella release?

@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Trying to get the capella release so this can move. I've asked in API's channel. hopefully this isn't completely stale!

@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

any updates on this? Are we still waiting on a Capella release?

this is now unblocked, awaiting approval to merge to dev.

types/deneb/block.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/deneb/state.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@rolfyone rolfyone merged commit 435c140 into ethereum:master May 2, 2023
@rolfyone rolfyone deleted the eip_rename branch May 2, 2023 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants