Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typos #5574

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion EIPS/eip-3525.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ This EIP introduces new token transfer models for semi-fungibility, including va

## Motivation

Tokenization is one of the most important trends by which to use and control digital assets in crypto. Traditionally, there have been two approaches to do so: fungible and non-fungible tokens. Fungible tokens generally use the EIP-20 standard, where every unit of an asset is identical to each other. EIP-20 is a flexible and efficient way to manipulate fungible tokens. Non-fungible tokens are predominantly EIP-721 tokens, a stadard capable of distinguishing digital assets from one another based on identity.
Tokenization is one of the most important trends by which to use and control digital assets in crypto. Traditionally, there have been two approaches to do so: fungible and non-fungible tokens. Fungible tokens generally use the EIP-20 standard, where every unit of an asset is identical to each other. EIP-20 is a flexible and efficient way to manipulate fungible tokens. Non-fungible tokens are predominantly EIP-721 tokens, a standard capable of distinguishing digital assets from one another based on identity.

However, both have significant drawbacks. For example, EIP-20 requires that users create a separate EIP-20 contract for each individual data structure or combination of customizable properties. In practice, this results in an extraordinarily large amount of EIP-20 contracts that need to be created. On the other hand, EIP-721 tokens provide no quantitative feature, significantly undercutting their computability, liquidity, and manageability. For example, if one was to create financial instruments such as bonds, insurance policy, or vesting plans using EIP-721, no standard interfaces are available for us to control the value in them, making it impossible, for example, to transfer a portion of the equity in the contract represented by the token.

Expand Down