EIP-4974: Fungible Non-tradable Tokens, or EXP #4974
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
All tests passed; auto-merging...(pass) eip-4974.md
(pass) assets/eip-4974/ERC4974.sol
(pass) assets/eip-4974/IERC4974.sol
(pass) assets/eip-4974/IERC4974Metadata.sol
|
|
Awaiting to be assigned an official EIP number. I will update all files accordingly once editors decide. |
wschwab
reviewed
Apr 5, 2022
lightclient
requested changes
Apr 5, 2022
dtedesco1
changed the title
co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> update links Apply initial suggestions from code review Update EIP number and typos. Co-authored-by: William Schwab <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]> rename, add enumerable, update language update name conventions, ERC165 identifier update backwards compatability
|
@Pandapip1 Updated with your suggested changes. Thanks again. |
SamWilsn
reviewed
Apr 7, 2022
MicahZoltu
reviewed
Apr 13, 2022
SamWilsn
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2022
|
Folder names are case-sensitive IIRC, and that would cause the issue with the links. |
PowerStream3604
pushed a commit
to PowerStream3604/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2022
* Apply suggestions from initial review co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> update links Apply initial suggestions from code review Update EIP number and typos. Co-authored-by: William Schwab <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]> rename, add enumerable, update language update name conventions, ERC165 identifier update backwards compatability * minor wording edit * update with participate and transfer nomenclature * update reference links * update reference to assets folder * removing the assets link
nachomazzara
pushed a commit
to nachomazzara/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2023
* Apply suggestions from initial review co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <[email protected]> update links Apply initial suggestions from code review Update EIP number and typos. Co-authored-by: William Schwab <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]> rename, add enumerable, update language update name conventions, ERC165 identifier update backwards compatability * minor wording edit * update with participate and transfer nomenclature * update reference links * update reference to assets folder * removing the assets link
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A need exists for fungible tokens that indicate reputation in a community, rather than serve as tradable assets. Lack of such assets contributes to destructive pay-to-play dynamics in today's DAOs and blockchain games. Vitalik Buterin writes "ad nauseum" (his words) about this problem. EIP-4974 seeks solutions via a token standard similar to EXP in games or Reddit Karma.
Existing proposals and discussions for non-tradable token standards (namely, EIP-4671 and EIP-1238) have been reviewed deeply. Both are optimizing for credentials or badges, which are very different use cases from EXP.
For more background information, please view the discussion on Ethereum Magicians here and initial PR.