-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How do we handle ancient Solidity versions in old final EIPs? #6138
Comments
See #5887 for how I would like this to be done. I would love interfaces to be rewritten--as long as the spec doesn't functionally change. |
Pandapip1
added
question
r-process
Relates to an EIP Process
r-eips
Relates to the formatting or another aspect of EIPs
and removed
enhancement
labels
Jan 6, 2023
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. |
This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Proposed Change
For example, in EIP-20, we have a very old Solidity version and the interfaces won't compile with recent Solidity versions.
We probably shouldn't rewrite old EIPs, but having our standards rot is also less than useful.
Some ideas:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: