Update eip-ens-as-holder

EIPS/eip-ens-as-holder

@@ -11,28 +11,35 @@ created: 2022-07-12
 requires: 137
 ---
 
-This is the suggested template for new EIPs.
-
-Note that an EIP number will be assigned by an editor. When opening a pull request to submit your EIP, please use an abbreviated title in the filename, `eip-draft_title_abbrev.md`.
-
-The title should be 44 characters or less. It should not repeat the EIP number in title, irrespective of the category. 
-
 ## Abstract
-Abstract is a multi-sentence (short paragraph) technical summary. This should be a very terse and human-readable version of the specification section. Someone should be able to read only the abstract to get the gist of what this specification does.
+An interface for smart contract to become a holder of tokens by honoring ENS ownership.
 
 ## Motivation
-The motivation section should describe the "why" of this EIP. What problem does it solve? Why should someone want to implement this standard? What benefit does it provide to the Ethereum ecosystem? What use cases does this EIP address?
+Currently, if someone wants to receive token, they have to setup a wallet address, otherwise,
+the minter or transferer will not be able to transfer or mint for that token. 
+
+By creating smart contract that conform to this interface specification, we can decouple
+the transfer of ownership from the existance of wallet addresses.
+
 
 ## Specification
-The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
 
-The technical specification should describe the syntax and semantics of any new feature. The specification should be detailed enough to allow competing, interoperable implementations for any of the current Ethereum platforms (go-ethereum, parity, cpp-ethereum, ethereumj, ethereumjs, and [others](https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Clients)).
+1. Any conforming smart contract must conform to `ERC721Recever` in [EIP-721](./eip-721.md) and `ERC1155Receiver` in [EIP-1155](./eip-1155.md).
+
+
+```solidity
+interface IERC_ENS_AS_HOLDER is ERC721Receiver, ERC1155Receiver { 
+}
+```
+
+
 
 ## Rationale
 The rationale fleshes out the specification by describing what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the feature is supported in other languages.
 
 ## Backwards Compatibility
-All EIPs that introduce backwards incompatibilities must include a section describing these incompatibilities and their severity. The EIP must explain how the author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. EIP submissions without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be rejected outright.
+No backward compatibility aware of.
+
 
 ## Test Cases
 Test cases for an implementation are mandatory for EIPs that are affecting consensus changes.  If the test suite is too large to reasonably be included inline, then consider adding it as one or more files in `../assets/eip-####/`.