Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

slither: bump ci versions #10410

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2024
Merged

slither: bump ci versions #10410

merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

tynes
Copy link
Contributor

@tynes tynes commented May 5, 2024

Description

Since slither seems to be failing consistently in CI, try bumping the
versions of the tooling.

Bumps to latest slither github action release: https://github.com/crytic/slither-action/releases/tag/v0.4.0

Meant to fix the slither issue seen in #10408

[-] SARIF output enabled, writing to results.sarif.
[-] Slither config provided: packages/contracts-bedrock/slither.config.json
[-] SLITHERARGS provided. Running slither with extra arguments
'forge clean' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
'forge config --json' running
'forge build --build-info --skip */test/** */scripts/** --force' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/slither/bin/slither", line 8, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 753, in main
    main_impl(all_detector_classes=detectors, all_printer_classes=printers)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 859, in main_impl
    ) = process_all(filename, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 107, in process_all
    ) = process_single(compilation, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 80, in process_single
    slither = Slither(target, ast_format=ast, **vars(args))
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/slither.py", line 156, in __init__
    sol_parser.parse_top_level_items(ast, path)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/solc_parsing/slither_compilation_unit_solc.py", line 326, in parse_top_level_items
    get_imported_scope = self.compilation_unit.get_scope(import_directive.filename)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/core/compilation_unit.py", line 282, in get_scope
    filename = self._crytic_compile_compilation_unit.crytic_compile.filename_lookup(
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/crytic_compile/crytic_compile.py", line 283, in filename_lookup
    raise ValueError(f"{filename} does not exist")
ValueError: lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Context.sol does not exist

Since slither seems to be failing consistently in CI, try bumping the
versions of the tooling.

Bumps to latest slither github action release: https://github.com/crytic/slither-action/releases/tag/v0.4.0

Meant to fix the slither issue seen in #10408

```
[-] SARIF output enabled, writing to results.sarif.
[-] Slither config provided: packages/contracts-bedrock/slither.config.json
[-] SLITHERARGS provided. Running slither with extra arguments
'forge clean' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
'forge config --json' running
'forge build --build-info --skip */test/** */scripts/** --force' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/slither/bin/slither", line 8, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 753, in main
    main_impl(all_detector_classes=detectors, all_printer_classes=printers)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 859, in main_impl
    ) = process_all(filename, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 107, in process_all
    ) = process_single(compilation, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 80, in process_single
    slither = Slither(target, ast_format=ast, **vars(args))
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/slither.py", line 156, in __init__
    sol_parser.parse_top_level_items(ast, path)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/solc_parsing/slither_compilation_unit_solc.py", line 326, in parse_top_level_items
    get_imported_scope = self.compilation_unit.get_scope(import_directive.filename)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/core/compilation_unit.py", line 282, in get_scope
    filename = self._crytic_compile_compilation_unit.crytic_compile.filename_lookup(
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/crytic_compile/crytic_compile.py", line 283, in filename_lookup
    raise ValueError(f"{filename} does not exist")
ValueError: lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Context.sol does not exist
```
@tynes tynes requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2024 17:39
@tynes tynes requested a review from trianglesphere May 5, 2024 17:39
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 5, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update involves a single change in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Slither, a static analysis tool. The version of the crytic/slither-action used in the workflow has been upgraded from v0.3.2 to v0.4.0, which likely includes enhancements or new features in the Slither analysis tool.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/slither.yml Updated crytic/slither-action from v0.3.2 to v0.4.0

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c67c67a and f7e17c6.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/slither.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/slither.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

tynes added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
slither is currently erroring in CI with a strange error.
This bumps `slither` to the latest release in an attempt to
fix that issue.

The issue is described here: #10410

The release can be found here: https://github.com/crytic/slither/releases

This needs a release of `ci-builder` followed up to get the new version
of slither running in CI.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
slither is currently erroring in CI with a strange error.
This bumps `slither` to the latest release in an attempt to
fix that issue.

The issue is described here: #10410

The release can be found here: https://github.com/crytic/slither/releases

This needs a release of `ci-builder` followed up to get the new version
of slither running in CI.
@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch May 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@trianglesphere trianglesphere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes are locally fine but CI isn't passing yet.

.github/workflows/slither.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tynes tynes enabled auto-merge May 6, 2024 22:39
@tynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tynes commented May 6, 2024

Changes are locally fine but CI isn't passing yet.

My guess is the issue is in the foundry <> slither relationship

@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
Since slither seems to be failing consistently in CI, try bumping the
versions of the tooling.

Bumps to latest slither github action release: https://github.com/crytic/slither-action/releases/tag/v0.4.0

Meant to fix the slither issue seen in #10408

```
[-] SARIF output enabled, writing to results.sarif.
[-] Slither config provided: packages/contracts-bedrock/slither.config.json
[-] SLITHERARGS provided. Running slither with extra arguments
'forge clean' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
'forge config --json' running
'forge build --build-info --skip */test/** */scripts/** --force' running (wd: /github/workspace/packages/contracts-bedrock)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/slither/bin/slither", line 8, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 753, in main
    main_impl(all_detector_classes=detectors, all_printer_classes=printers)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 859, in main_impl
    ) = process_all(filename, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 107, in process_all
    ) = process_single(compilation, args, detector_classes, printer_classes)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/__main__.py", line 80, in process_single
    slither = Slither(target, ast_format=ast, **vars(args))
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/slither.py", line 156, in __init__
    sol_parser.parse_top_level_items(ast, path)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/solc_parsing/slither_compilation_unit_solc.py", line 326, in parse_top_level_items
    get_imported_scope = self.compilation_unit.get_scope(import_directive.filename)
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/slither/core/compilation_unit.py", line 282, in get_scope
    filename = self._crytic_compile_compilation_unit.crytic_compile.filename_lookup(
  File "/opt/slither/lib/python3.9/site-packages/crytic_compile/crytic_compile.py", line 283, in filename_lookup
    raise ValueError(f"{filename} does not exist")
ValueError: lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/utils/Context.sol does not exist
```
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 15e8387 May 6, 2024
70 of 71 checks passed
@tynes tynes deleted the slither-ci-bump branch May 6, 2024 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants