-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixing formatting issues.mdx #909
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new field, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/chain/identity/schemas.mdx (1)
116-116
: Please make the following changes to improve clarity and consistency:
- Reword the description of the
votingGroup
field to avoid the phrase "in case". For example: "Assigns voters to subcategories when the Round has subcategories".- Use title case for the
selectionMethod
field to match the capitalization of other fields.Apply this diff to implement the suggestions:
-| votingGroup | Used to assign voters to subcategories in case the Round has subcategories | -| selectionMethod | The method in which this voter was selected | +| votingGroup | Assigns voters to subcategories when the Round has subcategories | +| SelectionMethod | The method in which this voter was selected |
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pages/chain/identity/schemas.mdx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
pages/chain/identity/schemas.mdx (1)
Pattern
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Use bold for prominence instead of all caps or italics.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for headers, buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
"
Additional comments not posted (1)
pages/chain/identity/schemas.mdx (1)
116-116
: The addition of thevotingGroup
field is a valuable enhancement to the schema.It allows for more granular categorization of voters within a round, which could enable new capabilities in voter assignment and result processing.
Description
There was a formatting issue on the schemas page on the table for the retro funding voters schema
Tests
none
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.
Metadata