Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

formatting the page header thing #893

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024
Merged

formatting the page header thing #893

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Sep 11, 2024

Description

Fixing the template so there isn't a big bold header

Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 3 02 20 PM

@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2024 19:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new Markdown section in the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md file, adding a structured template for documentation entries. The template includes fields for the title, tags, and description, aimed at standardizing the documentation process for contributors. The changes enhance the organization and clarity of documentation practices without altering existing functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md Added a Markdown template section for documentation entries, including fields for title, tags, and description.

Possibly related PRs

  • adding audit template #891: Introduces a structured template for documentation audits in the same file, aligning with the goal of enhancing documentation practices.

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10325b8 and 745513d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md (1)

46-52: LGTM!

The addition of the Markdown template section is a great improvement to standardize documentation entries. The template provides a clear structure for contributors to follow, including fields for the title, tags, and description. This will enhance consistency and organization of documentation across the project.

The changes do not introduce any functional issues and can be safely merged.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 745513d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/66e1e9506f9efe0008ad4d7a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-893--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit f42f725 into main Sep 13, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the quick-audit-template-fix branch September 13, 2024 01:53
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants