Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding bedrocks activation time #1069

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

adding bedrocks activation time #1069

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Nov 2, 2024

Description

  • Added the Bedrock upgrade timestamp and block number
  • Added a small section about the bedrock upgrade

Fixes #927

@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2024 04:11
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit eed6713
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6729651aca8de30008926c0d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1069--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the documentation regarding network upgrades, specifically adding a new section for the Bedrock upgrade. This section outlines the transition to a modular architecture, which separates the consensus, execution, and settlement layers. Additionally, the network upgrades table has been updated to include the Bedrock upgrade, along with its activation details. Changes to the words.txt file include the addition and removal of specific terms, alongside standardization of casing and formatting for consistency.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx Added section for the Bedrock upgrade and updated the network upgrades table with activation details.
words.txt Modified entries by removing, adding, and standardizing terms for consistency.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add Bedrock activation date to network upgrades (927)

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (1)

116-119: LGTM! Consider adding specification link for consistency

The content is well-written and properly formatted. However, for consistency with other upgrade sections, consider adding a link to the Bedrock specifications, similar to how other sections link to their respective specification documents.

Apply this change to the header:

-### Bedrock 
+### [Bedrock](https://specs.optimism.io/protocol/bedrock/overview.html)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b650db and 2d1ec2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (2 hunks)
  • words.txt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • words.txt
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "

pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (1)

31-31: Fix URL formatting in the table

The governance approval URL should be wrapped in angle brackets for consistency with Markdown standards.

Apply this change:

-| Bedrock                                                             | (https://gov.optimism.io/t/final-upgrade-1-bedrock-protocol-upgrade-v2/5548)     | Tue Jun 06 2023 16:28:23 UTC (`1686079703`) at block `105235063`                                                                        | N/A                                                                                                                                     |
+| Bedrock                                                             | <https://gov.optimism.io/t/final-upgrade-1-bedrock-protocol-upgrade-v2/5548>     | Tue Jun 06 2023 16:28:23 UTC (`1686079703`) at block `105235063`                                                                        | N/A                                                                                                                                     |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 31-31:
Don’t use literal URLs without angle brackets


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d1ec2c and fc50d54.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx

[warning] 31-31:
Don’t use literal URLs without angle brackets


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence


[warning] 31-31:
Misaligned table fence

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades.mdx (1)

116-119: LGTM! Clear and well-structured section

The new Bedrock section effectively explains the architectural changes and their benefits. The content follows the documentation guidelines, using proper nouns and maintaining a professional tone.

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit c8b444e into main Nov 5, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the sb-add-bedrock-time branch November 5, 2024 00:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feedback for “Network Upgrades” [Add Bedrock Date?]
2 participants