EIPIP Meeting 71 Agenda

[dtedesco1]

Date and Time

Wednesday, Dec 14, 2022, at 15:00 UTC

Location

Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel

YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw

Agenda

1. Discuss Issues/PRs, topics

• Last Call changes must be separate from the PR to move to Final ethereum/EIPs#6129
• Make Stagnant and Withdrawn EIPs less visible ethereum/EIPs#6027

Changes to Final EIP

• Update EIP-5375: Fix typo in JSON ethereum/EIPs#6104
• Update EIP-20: Renovate ethereum/EIPs#6038
• Update EIP-721: Update link ethereum/EIPs#6012
• Include Ganache private chains (5777) in EIP-155 ethereum/EIPs#5877

2. Discussion continued from earlier meetings

• Discussion of Criteria for advancing EIP status: A Straw-man Proposal
  • https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/commits/master/EIPS/eip-6049.md
• Update EIP-3475: Changing comments ethereum/EIPs#5789

3. EIP Bot

• "Requires" section should not accept Withdrawn EIP ethereum/EIPs#6131

4. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.

EIPsInsight.com
Hackmd

5. EIP Editing Office Hour

Recording Meeting 8
Agenda Meeting 9

6. Review action items from earlier meetings

Prev. meeting notes 70

Next meeting - TBD

[xinbenlv]

Procedure disuccsion https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/discussion-of-criteria-for-advancing-eip-status-a-straw-man-proposal/11995?u=xinbenlv

[poojaranjan]

Summary

1. Discuss Issues/PRs, topics

• Propose Policy: Last Call changes shall be separate from the PR to move to Final
  Decision: Big changes in Last Call will restart the "Review ends" date
• Hide Stagnant and Withdrawn EIPs from the EIP list
  General consensus: Not very useful feature to hide

Changes to Final EIP

• PR-6104: Sam will merge it
• PR-6038: General consensus - PR should not be merged. Sam will create an issue for concern regarding updating Solidity to old EIPs.
• PR-6012: Author needs to list normative changes and non-normative changes. We should avoid adding change to big EIPs like this. Closed.
• PR-5877: Shouldn't change older EIPs for updating table. Anyway, an EIP isn't a best place to maintain a table.

2. Discussion continued from earlier meetings

• A Straw-man Proposal: Continue collecting feedback here

3. EIP Bot

• Group seems to be in favor. Will keep the issue to collect if anyone opposes to the proposal.

[poojaranjan]

Closing in favor of #202