Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.5] fix revision loss issue caused by compaction - 17780 #17865

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

// NOTE: The proc panics and exit code is 2. It's impossible to restart
// that etcd proc because last exit code is 2 and Restart() refuses to
// start new one. Using IsRunning() function is to cleanup status.
require.False(t, clus.Procs[targetIdx].IsRunning())
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Side note:

// The proc panics and exit code is 2. It's impossible to restart
// that etcd proc because last exit code is 2 and Restart() refuses to
// start new one. Using IsRunning() function is to cleanup status.

Copy link
Member

@serathius serathius Apr 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we might be missing some improvements to expect on release-3.5 branch. As a testing library change, we could consider backporting them avoid need for branch specific test code code causing branches to diverge.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to make the test as consistent as possible. @fuweid can you please raise a followup to track it? thanks

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed #17869

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit a7a8fb8 into etcd-io:release-3.5 Apr 24, 2024
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants