-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
common test: update auth test interface #14626
Conversation
b3b4a81
to
425970e
Compare
425970e
to
8eb88fd
Compare
8eb88fd
to
4bd9af2
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14626 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.39% 75.37% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 457 457
Lines 37271 37271
==========================================
- Hits 28101 28093 -8
- Misses 7396 7406 +10
+ Partials 1774 1772 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
9818ffe
to
206414a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Chao Chen <[email protected]>
206414a
to
f3c47d7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you @chaochn47
This should be a safe change, let me merge it right now |
withAuth
option in common test entry pointNewEtcdctl
accepts a client option that could have invalid user name and password, it should fail client creation. I am happy to add more comments to reduce the confusion.AuthEnable
andAuthDisable
does not need response in the function signature.@ahrtr @serathius