Fixed mismatch in printf types (IDFGH-8883)

[gregjesl]

Closes #10303

[KaeLL]

I believe the <inttypes.h> formats would be better.

[gregjesl]

@KaeLL Updates made 👍

[igrr]

Thanks for the PR @gregjesl!

Could you please also remove the following line in the same PR:

esp-idf/examples/get-started/hello_world/main/CMakeLists.txt

Line 4 in 7869f4e

target_compile_options(${COMPONENT_LIB} PRIVATE "-Wno-format")

and combine your changes into a single commit (using git rebase -i).

[gregjesl]

@igrr Changes made. I updated a couple other print statements as well, let me know if I over-did it 😄

[igrr]

sha=58d64f9a00dea44273004cfecc15f68008571ab3

[igrr]

I updated a couple other print statements as well, let me know if I over-did it 😄

@gregjesl I actually had to revert the changes related to 8- and 16-bit types. This is because newlib-nano (CONFIG_NEWLIB_NANO_FORMAT option) doesn't support 8-bit-specific format specifier produced by PRIu8... (Our internal CI have caught this issue on C2, where CONFIG_NEWLIB_NANO_FORMAT is enabled by default and this example has started failing.)