ISSUE-348: Adds a pseudo Node "Upcaster" for Routed Views in the presence of "Active Display Settings" tab #349
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #348
This tries to get around the exception that happens when a View uses %node as a parameter, but does not upcast it the value to NodeInterface. It (of course) does this without too much overhead, which means it does not processes the View Entity Itself and we simply assume a
view_id
+node
argument are reasons enough to enrich the Route. It is important to node that really only place where this can happen (so pretty edge case) is when a View's path is node/%node given that (fixed in code) that is where our Route (Active Display settings) will call this class. Basically when Node level Tabs (actions) and View level Actions depend on each other/live side by side.