-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
29 load additional nginx configurations inside the server block for easier customization #30
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to three files: Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rootfs/etc/nginx/nginx.conf (1)
44-46
: Consider protocol-agnostic configuration approachThe current implementation only includes server-specific configurations when X-Forwarded-Proto is HTTPS. This might be too restrictive as some configurations should apply regardless of the protocol. Consider:
- Moving protocol-specific configurations to separate files
- Using the main include directive for common configurations
Here's a suggested structure:
# Common configurations (outside if block) include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/common/*.conf; # Protocol-specific configurations (inside if block) if ($http_x_forwarded_proto = "https") { include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/https/*.conf; }README.md (1)
109-133
: Enhance configuration persistence documentation.The Nginx configuration section is well-structured and informative. Consider adding the following clarifications to help users better understand configuration persistence in a Docker context:
- Mention that configurations added directly to the container will not persist after container restart.
- Recommend using Docker volumes or build-time copying for persistent configurations.
- Add a note about restarting the Nginx service or container after configuration changes.
Add the following content after line 133:
+ +> **Note**: Changes made directly inside the container will not persist after container restart. For persistent configurations: +> - Use Docker volumes to mount your configuration files +> - Add configurations during image build using Dockerfile +> - Restart the container or Nginx service after making configuration changes🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
125-125: Expected: indented; Actual: fenced
Code block style(MD046, code-block-style)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.gitignore
(1 hunks)README.md
(2 hunks)rootfs/etc/nginx/nginx.conf
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
125-125: Expected: indented; Actual: fenced
Code block style
(MD046, code-block-style)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
125-131
: LGTM! The code block formatting is appropriate.
The fenced code block style with syntax highlighting is preferred for better readability and maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
125-125: Expected: indented; Actual: fenced
Code block style
(MD046, code-block-style)
218-218
:
Fix inconsistent image name in the command example.
The command uses alpine-php-webserver
but should use erseco/alpine-php-webserver
to match the image name used throughout the documentation.
-docker-compose exec --user root alpine-php-webserver sh
+docker-compose exec --user root webserver sh
Note: The service name should match what's defined in your docker-compose.yml example (which uses webserver
).
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
rootfs/etc/nginx/nginx.conf
Outdated
|
||
# Include additional server-specific configurations | ||
include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/*.conf; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using "if" blocks in server context
Using if
directives in Nginx server blocks is generally discouraged due to unexpected behavior. Consider using separate server blocks for HTTP and HTTPS traffic:
# Default HTTP server
server {
listen 8080 default_server;
include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/common/*.conf;
# ... other configurations ...
}
# HTTPS server (when behind reverse proxy)
server {
listen 8080;
include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/common/*.conf;
include /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/https/*.conf;
# Only accept HTTPS traffic from reverse proxy
if ($http_x_forwarded_proto != "https") {
return 403;
}
# ... other configurations ...
}
💡 Codebase verification
Directory permissions should be enforced in Dockerfile and documentation
The server-conf.d
directory is referenced in the README and nginx configuration but isn't created during the build process. To ensure proper security:
- Add instructions in the Dockerfile to create
/etc/nginx/server-conf.d
with appropriate permissions (700 or 755) - Add a note in the README about required directory permissions
- Consider adding a validation check in the entrypoint script
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure proper permissions on server-conf.d directory
The wildcard include of configuration files could pose a security risk if the directory permissions aren't properly restricted. Ensure that /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/
and its contents are only writable by root/appropriate system users.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the directory exists and verify its permissions
if [ -d "/etc/nginx/server-conf.d" ]; then
ls -la /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/
stat /etc/nginx/server-conf.d/
fi
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the directory is defined in the Dockerfile or created during build
rg -l "server-conf\.d" --type dockerfile
# Check if there are any references to this directory in the codebase
rg "server-conf\.d"
# Look for any related configuration or setup files
fd -t f ".*\.conf$" rootfs/etc/nginx/
Length of output: 731
This pull request enhances the Nginx configuration setup by making it more flexible and easier to customize. The most important changes include updating the documentation to reflect these improvements and modifying the main Nginx configuration file to support server-specific configurations.
Documentation updates:
README.md
: Updated the configuration section toNginx Configuration
, added instructions for adding custom configurations, and provided an example of a server-specific configuration.Nginx configuration updates:
rootfs/etc/nginx/nginx.conf
: Included a line to load additional server-specific configurations from/etc/nginx/server-conf.d/*.conf
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores