core: Basic validation of EIP-4844 transactions #992
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@yperbasis I've added a SSZ encoding/decoding implementation in consensus_light_client that is a prototype branch and likely won't be merged as a whole; my plan is instead to split its changes into smaller PRs sooner or later. |
Cool, so we can add SSZ in a separate PR(s) later based on that. |
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces the new EIP-4844 transaction type with basic validation only. SSZ serialization and actual KZG commitment checks are not implemented yet (will be implemented in separate PRs later).