Issue #530 - Clarify workflow in examples

[nikosbosse]

Description

This PR closes #530.

As discussed in #530, this PR updates examples to use the pipe operator consistently and conform to the happy path outlined for users.

Checklist

• My PR is based on a package issue and I have explicitly linked it.
• I have included the target issue or issues in the PR title as follows: issue-number: PR title
• I have tested my changes locally.
• I have added or updated unit tests where necessary.
• I have updated the documentation if required.
• I have built the package locally and run rebuilt docs using roxygen2.
• My code follows the established coding standards and I have run lintr::lint_package() to check for style issues introduced by my changes.
• I have added a news item linked to this PR.
• I have reviewed CI checks for this PR and addressed them as far as I am able.

[seabbs]

❤️ Looks great. It feels kind of crazy that we can't use the base pipe yet / are stuck loading magrittr everywhere not sure what we can do about that though sadly.

[nikosbosse]

Requiring R 4.1 🤷

[seabbs]

Maybe its nearly time