Bug fix in stress/force routine producing Infinity/NaN. #7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Wrong way of passing IN/OUT variable to a subroutine.
elinscott
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ooof, fantastic work finding this bug. To test your changes I merged this branch with add_tests and the tests -- which previously returned Infs and NaNs -- now pass (see here for details).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Wrong way of passing IN/OUT variables to the subroutine that checks and applies PBCs. This causes Infinity and/or NaN at run time if compiling with gfortran with optimization.