refactor: infra client CreateOrUpdate to ServerSideApply

[ardikabs]

What type of PR is this?
Full context #3111

This PR will refactor the infra client which is moving from an imperative to a declarative way to manage the resources, specifically with the server-side apply mechanism, including a full refactor on CreateOrUpdate to ServerSideApply.
The reason, quoted from #3111 (comment):

Apply expects to manage the entire lifecycle of the object, so when you created independently, it had no record of the original applied content, so it didn't know your updated manifest should remove the old port.

In previous attempts, we created a resource using the Create operation but then attempted updates using the Apply operation. This led us to identify issues on certain fields, such as deployment.spec.template.spec.containers[*].ports[*], that returned the following error message:

{"runner": "infrastructure", "error": "failed to create or update deployment envoy-gateway-system/envoy-envoy-gateway-system-e2e-test-infra-7104d1de: for Update: Deployment.apps \"envoy-envoy-gateway-system-e2e-test-infra-7104d1de\" is invalid: spec.template.spec.containers[0].ports[1].name: Duplicate value: \"http-e0603c49\""}

I've also included an e2e test to ensure at least for the Gateway listener changes, specifically for the port name and number.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

[ardikabs]

cc @zirain

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.00000% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.05%. Comparing base (29946b0) to head (b5135aa).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head b5135aa differs from pull request most recent head 9a40e37. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9a40e37 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
internal/infrastructure/kubernetes/infra_client.go	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ternal/infrastructure/kubernetes/infra_resource.go	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3134      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.51%   67.05%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       22673    18040    -4633     
==========================================
- Hits        15080    12096    -2984     
+ Misses       6720     5077    -1643     
+ Partials      873      867       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ardikabs]

/retest

[arkodg]

LGTM thanks !

non blocking comment - prefer if we moved the test out of e2e into internal/infrastructure/kubernetes similar to https://github.com/envoyproxy/gateway/blob/main/internal/provider/kubernetes/kubernetes_test.go in a follow up