Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tls: remove SHA-1 cipher suites from the defaults on the server-side #20643

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2022
Merged

tls: remove SHA-1 cipher suites from the defaults on the server-side #20643

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2022

Conversation

derekguo001
Copy link

Signed-off-by: derekguo001 [email protected]

Commit Message: tls: remove SHA-1 cipher suites from the defaults on the server-side
Additional Description:
Risk Level:
Testing:
Docs Changes:
Release Notes: tls: remove SHA-1 cipher suites from the defaults on the server-side
Platform Specific Features:
[Optional Runtime guard:]
[Optional Fixes #Issue] #5400
[Optional Fixes commit #PR or SHA]
[Optional Deprecated:]
[Optional API Considerations:]

@derekguo001
Copy link
Author

/retest

@repokitteh-read-only
Copy link

Retrying Azure Pipelines:
Retried failed jobs in: envoy-presubmit

🐱

Caused by: a #20643 (comment) was created by @derekguo001.

see: more, trace.

@wrowe
Copy link
Contributor

wrowe commented Apr 6, 2022

Per #5401 - @PiotrSikora can you confirm it's time to land this deprecation, and that the changes entry is sufficient?

@wrowe wrowe requested a review from PiotrSikora April 6, 2022 00:38
@wrowe wrowe self-assigned this Apr 6, 2022
PiotrSikora
PiotrSikora previously approved these changes Apr 6, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@PiotrSikora PiotrSikora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks fine, but as usual, I'd recommend merging it after release instead of right before it.

@wrowe
Copy link
Contributor

wrowe commented Apr 6, 2022

/wait on the quarterly release coming up mid-April

@wrowe
Copy link
Contributor

wrowe commented Apr 16, 2022

I'd recommend merging it after release instead of right before it.

Agreed, moving it forward once it clears CI.

/retest

@repokitteh-read-only
Copy link

Retrying Azure Pipelines:
Retried failed jobs in: envoy-presubmit

🐱

Caused by: a #20643 (comment) was created by @wrowe.

see: more, trace.

@wrowe
Copy link
Contributor

wrowe commented Apr 16, 2022

/lgtm

@repokitteh-read-only
Copy link

please specify a single label can be specified

🐱

Caused by: a #20643 (comment) was created by @wrowe.

see: more, trace.

@wrowe wrowe merged commit 5181d23 into envoyproxy:main Apr 16, 2022
@derekguo001 derekguo001 deleted the remove-sha1-cipher-suite branch April 17, 2022 01:56
vehre-x41 pushed a commit to vehre-x41/envoy that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
mum4k added a commit to envoyproxy/nighthawk that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
- updated `.bazelrc` based on envoyproxy/envoy#20852 and envoyproxy/envoy#20813. Disabling platform mappings in our configuration, since we don't need them.
- no changes in `.bazelversion`, `ci/run_envoy_docker.sh` or `tools/gen_compilation_database.py`.
- switching integration tests that verify custom TLS configuration to another two ciphers that are supported in the default Envoy server configuration after envoyproxy/envoy#20643.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Sobon <[email protected]>
htuch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2022
lizan pushed a commit to envoyproxy/data-plane-api that referenced this pull request May 13, 2022
…(#21240)

Related PR: envoyproxy/envoy#20643

Signed-off-by: derekguo001 <[email protected]>

Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 81cebf6b12b13f490cc0ff8c77abaaffc7ef590f
ravenblackx pushed a commit to ravenblackx/envoy that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
ravenblackx pushed a commit to ravenblackx/envoy that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
oschaaf pushed a commit to maistra/envoy that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants