-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
examples: add VRP runtime validation to verify_examples. #14099
Conversation
This is a regression test to cover the issue underlying envoyproxy#14066. Risk level: Low Testing: Validating manually verify.sh passes, CI. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]>
CC @akonradi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo @phlax comment and potential suggestion.
/wait
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
FROM envoyproxy/envoy-google-vrp-dev:latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WDYT about just moving VRP into examples? It is technically an example of a somewhat secure configuration? Would that be simpler and more self contained?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure how this would integrate with the DockerHub push flow. Examples run after the base images that get pushed to DockerHub are built in CI. Do we push any other examples to DockerHub?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah dunno, just a thought. NBD.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
…14099) This is a regression test to cover the issue underlying envoyproxy#14066. Risk level: Low Testing: Validating manually verify.sh passes, CI. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]>
…14099) This is a regression test to cover the issue underlying envoyproxy#14066. Risk level: Low Testing: Validating manually verify.sh passes, CI. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qin Qin <[email protected]>
This is a regression test to cover the issue underlying
#14066.
Risk level: Low
Testing: Validated manually verify.sh passes, CI.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch [email protected]