-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add method call info for infix operators #7090
Merged
mergify
merged 18 commits into
develop
from
wip/db/6374-methodcall-info-for-infix-operators
Jun 27, 2023
+417
−75
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
27434fc
DRAFT
4e6 756cb51
feat: method call wrapper for builtins
4e6 71012ef
Merge branch 'develop' into wip/db/6374-methodcall-info-for-infix-ope…
4e6 e7712f6
DRAFT: builtin method dispatch
4e6 64efbcd
debug: get_constructor_name
4e6 fc8a21a
misc: tidy exception message
4e6 3f004b5
misc: cleanup tests
4e6 fa8b6ab
Merge branch 'develop' into wip/db/6374-methodcall-info-for-infix-ope…
4e6 1c4ad68
feat: update builtin root node
4e6 920b4bb
fix: auto registering functions
4e6 fa44f94
fix: runtime errors test
4e6 626b876
fix: builtin types test
4e6 ac184a4
fix: visualization tests
4e6 a0de981
misc: changelog
4e6 e395c4d
fix: date test
4e6 5ec1856
misc: cleanup
4e6 9854a96
Merge branch 'develop' into wip/db/6374-methodcall-info-for-infix-ope…
4e6 4ff9935
fix: runtime test
4e6 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised the case for
EnsoRootNode
is removed and nothing gets broken!?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
EnsoRootNode
does not contain enough information to build the method pointer. We can simply skip it