Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tixxdz/fleetctl improve unit lookup and wait #16

Closed
wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

tixxdz
Copy link

@tixxdz tixxdz commented Mar 2, 2016

No description provided.

Djalal Harouni added 21 commits March 2, 2016 13:24
* tryWaitForUnitStates() tries to wait for units to reach the desired state.
* getBlockAttempts() gets the correct value of how many attempts to try
		     before giving up on an operation.

These helpers will be used to make the code more consistent and clean.
We do not intended to change any behaviour here.
* Cover code path of getUnit*() functions with debug messages
* Improve code comments
Improve code comments about getUnitFileFromTemplate() and kill some
other useless code comments.
Add getUnitInstanceInfo() to check if the unit name is an instance of a
template unit and while we are it improve the error handling.
@dongsupark
Copy link

This tree looks good. But when getting into the detail, it's a little hard to follow each commit. Would it be better to reduce the number of commits, for example, by squashing relevant commits around GetUnitInstanceInfo()?

@tixxdz
Copy link
Author

tixxdz commented Mar 2, 2016

@dongsupark you are right! and I'm trying to do that, yes the branch got long after the review from Jon, you can check the relevant PR here: coreos#1433 So I did handle all Jon comments. I force pushed that branch so commits were squashed! however I opened this PR here in our branch to track a CI functional test that was failing, I wanted to test it also before merging that PR... still in progress. thank you!

@tixxdz tixxdz closed this Mar 30, 2016
@tixxdz tixxdz deleted the tixxdz/fleetctl-improve-unit-lookup-and-wait branch March 30, 2016 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants