Use pep562 as a dependency rather than bundling? #1604
-
It seems like a trivially-forked subset of the pep562 package is included as Is there a path to using the library as a dependency instead of bundling it, or a particular reason not to do so? Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
If this is only needed on Pythons older than 3.7 as suggested by the pep562 readme, it would be nice if the bundled implementation could be only imported and used on Python versions that need it. Then distribution packagers targeting Python 3.7 and later could just remove the unnecessary module. Or, if an external dependency were used, it could be conditional on the Python version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That module was already removed from master. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
That module was already removed from master.