Add new basic helpers to Ember

text/0000-basic-template-helpers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+- Start Date: 2018-10-13
+- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
+- Ember Issue: (leave this empty)
+
+# Add new basic template helpers to Ember
+
+## Summary
+
+Add new built-in template helpers to perform basic boolean operations and comparisons in templates, identical to some of the
+helpers in [ember-truth-helpers](https://github.com/jmurphyau/ember-truth-helpers).
+
+This is a resurrection of [RFC #152](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/152) that was opened over
+by @martndemus two years ago, updated to reflect the new start of the things in Ember, with the glimmer
+VM powering our templates.
+
+## Motivation
+
+It is a very common necessity to almost every Ember app to perform certain operations like compare
+by equality, negate a value or perform boolean operations, and often the most convenient place to
+do it is right in the templates.
+Because of that, `ember-truth-helpers` is probably the single most installed addon that exists, either
+directly by apps or indirectly by other addons that those apps use.
+
+The fact that this addon is so popular is very telling and Ember.js should consider moving into the
+core of the templating engine at least some of those helpers.
+
+A second reason is that I believe it would help making Ember more approachable by newcomers
+that have _some_ experience in other frameworks. One of the most shocking moments that developers
+that are familiar with React, Vue or Angular experience when trying Ember is that they cannot,
+at least out of the box, perform the most basic logical comparisons and operation they are so used to
+in JSX or Vue/Angular templates.
+
+A third reason is that if we implement those super common helpers in the Glimmer VM, that would open
+a important vector of low level optimization.
+
+Consider the following template:
+
+```hbs
+{{#if (and @featureEnabled this.expensiveComputedProperty @model.asyncEDRelationship.length)}}
+  {{!-- some logic --}}
+{{else}}
+  {{!-- some other logic --}}
+{{/if}}
+```
+
+Because of the way Ember helpers work, all their input parameters are eagerly evaluated by the
+Glimmer VM and passed to the helpers. This might include computationally expensive computed properties,
+or hitting code paths that trigger network requests.
+
+Implementing helpers like `and` or `or` at a lower lever would allow those helpers to be evaluated in
+short circuit, so if `@featureEnabled` is false, neither of the following arguments will ever evaluated.
+
+Going one step further into the optimizing compiler world, if **every** invocation of the component
+with this template receives `@featureEnabled={{false}}`, the compiler could even completely remove
+the conditional and the truthy branch of the if from compiled output.
+
+The last reason is that if the [RFC #367](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/367) eventually gets merged,
+these helpers are the perfect candidates to create adoption friction in the community because of how
+pervasive its usage it in so many templates, forcing them to explicitly importing them on most templates
+or adding them to the proposed `prelude.hbs` file.
+
+## Detailed design
+
+The process consists on deciding what helpers from `ember-truth-helpers` we consider the most important
+and move them into Ember.js itself or even the Glimmer VM, in a fully backwards compatible way.
+
+I propose to add to core at least:
+
+- `eq`
+- `not`
+- `and`
+- `or`
+- `gt` and `gte`
+- `lt` and `lte`
+
+Those helpers are very low lever and generally useful in both Ember and Glimmer.
+
+I propose to not add:
+
+- `is-array` (uses `Ember.isArray`)
+- `is-empty` (uses `Ember.isEmpty`)
+- `is-equal` (uses `Ember.isEqual`)
+- `xor`      (not very common)
+- `not-eq`   (can be expressed as `(not (eq a b)`)
+
+When this feature is implemented, we would update `ember-truth-helpers` to automatically remove
+the promoted helpers from the code when the Ember is above a certain version number.
+
+## How we teach this
+
+The introduction of these helpers does not impact the current mental model for Ember applications.
+
+In addition to API and Guides documentation with illustrative examples of usage of the various helpers,
+and explanation of their short circuiting nature might be warranted.
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+We are increasing the public API of the framework, and every line of code is a liability, although
+those helpers are extremely straightforward.
+
+## Alternatives
+
+An alternative path would be to include `ember-truth-helpers` in the default blueprint for apps and
+addons.
+However, this alternative loses strength due to the fact that it is not possible to implement short
+circuiting helpers in Ember's userspace, and because even if an addon is added by default, user
+can still choose to remove it, so addons would not just be able to rely on them.
+
+## Unresolved questions
+
+The main unresolved question is what helpers we deem worthy of being moved into the core, and also
+if we want any other helpers not mentioned above.
+
+In particular, I'm sitting on the fence about `not-eq`.
+It is not _really necessary_, in the same way `{{unless foo}}` can also be expressed as `{{#if (not foo)}}`,
+but it may be convenient.
+
+Other helpers that come to mind that _could_ also be worth adding:
+
+- `array` (there is an [RFC](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/318) and its being implemented)
+- `add`, `subtract`, and other arithmetic operators.
+- `{{#await promise as |value|}}` to render a block conditionally if a promise resolves or fails.
+
+If there is interest in them, I advocate creating standalone RFCS for each one of them.