Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUEST] Module Unification: Final Cut #16373

Closed
10 of 22 tasks
mixonic opened this issue Mar 13, 2018 · 29 comments
Closed
10 of 22 tasks

[QUEST] Module Unification: Final Cut #16373

mixonic opened this issue Mar 13, 2018 · 29 comments
Labels

Comments

@mixonic
Copy link
Member

mixonic commented Mar 13, 2018

Throughout 2017 a small crew has pushed forward the implementation of Ember's new filesystem layout for applications and addons. This was described in RFC 143 and we've lovingly called the effort "module unification".

Much of the effort up to now has been either design or exploration-heavy. It wasn't plausible to reduce the work list into things that individual contributors could pick up without context.

But in the last weeks we have turned a corner. Our effort is behind three feature flags in Ember, Ember CLI, and ember-resolver. In order to enable these flags by default for new applications, we need your help. In this quest issue I've outlined the current list of known blockers as well as guidance for how to test the new features in new and migrated codebases.

Several contributors have been huddled in #st-module-unification on the Ember.js Community Slack in recent months. Please join us there when you start to pick up one of these tasks.

The Issue List

Ember.js

Ember CLI

  • Ember CLI uses the presence of src/ to configure the return value of isModuleUnification(). This works well for apps and addons. The detection fails for a classic dummy app in a module unification addon, however. Although a dummy app may be in tests/dummy/app/ with no tests/dummy/src/ directory, the addon's root level src/ confuses our logic and the dummy app is incorrectly treated as a module unification app.
  • Requires design: An ember addon author may want two dummy apps for testing, a module unification src/ app and a classic app/ app. Their acceptance tests would run with both apps, or they could have two acceptance test suites.
  • Module Unification blueprints and generators, mostly tracked at: Module Unification: Blueprints ember-cli/ember-cli#7530
  • ember-maybe-import-generator-for-testing needs to apply to tests in src directory, see https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-maybe-import-regenerator-for-testing
  • If a classic app is running a version of Ember CLI that pre-dates module unification support, then an addon using module unification (with a src/ directory)must have a way a) fail gracefully or b) bring the reexport logic we use in ember-cli with it to the old version of ember-cli.
  • Module unification addons re-export their top level components to app/ for classic apps. This allows an addon author to use a src/ directory and still have their addon work for either kind of app. We would like to provide addons a build-time way to configure this re-export logic. It would permit them to re-name components and services to match legacy classic APIs while they adopt new APIs for module unification apps.
  • Ember addons need an API that allows them to alter the module unification config (for example https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-resolver/blob/master/mu-trees/addon/ember-config.js) and add their own collections and types. In theory Ember (or the resolver?) would use this same API to add its own types and collections.
  • Fix lib/models/project.js's isModuleUnification method to not only rely on presence of top level src as "the project is module unification format". Specifically, an addon may be in module unification format, but have its dummy app be in classic format.

Ember Template Compiler

  • hbs helpers should accept a source argument like templates in a running app do. In: https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli-htmlbars-inline-precompile
  • Part of the hbs AST transform should be to inline the source value. However test files for a private collection, local lookup component might not be able to use the "easy" value of their filename and still have access to resolve their subject. For example in src/ui/routes/application/-component/foo-bar/component-test.js templates created with hbs will not be able to access the {{foo-bar}} component. The simplest solution here is to pass a source to these hbs templates that is "one level up", for example the source for templates in the test file would be src/ui/routes/application. There are some tradeoffs in taking this or other approaches, but it seems like a good place to start. Allowing you to test templates from MU co-located tests ember-cli/babel-plugin-htmlbars-inline-precompile#33

Ember Resolver

Migrator

ember-svg-jar

ember-load-initializers

Several contributors have been huddled in #st-module-unification on the Ember.js Community Slack in recent months. Please join us there when you start to pick up one of these tasks.

Creating a new module unification app

Install Ember CLI master:

npm install -g https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli.git

Generate a new app with the module unification env variable:

MODULE_UNIFICATION=true EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember new my-app

Out of the box a newly generated application will use the ember-resolver "fallback" resolver. This allows the module unification app to use classic app/ addons. Much later, once we've converted the default addons that ship with new Ember apps, we can drop the "fallback" resolver and use the MU-only "glimmer wrapper" resolver.

The implementation of module unification uses a configuration of collections and types. In the classic addon app/ layout, addons could define new types of factories without any explicit definition. Before removing the feature flags we need an API for them to explicitly do so against the module unification config. Temporarily you may want to mutate the config for your app to add a type, for example in src/resolver.js.

If you have an issue after generating a new application you can likely find or file an issue:

Migrating an existing Ember app

Install the module migrator:

npm install -g ember-module-migrator jscodeshift

Run the migrator on your app codebase:

cd ~/project/path
ember-module-migrator

Install Ember CLI master:

npm install --save-dev https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli.git

And update your files to match the latest blueprint, similar to what you do for any upgrade:

ember init

You'll want to:

  • Keep the ember-resolver feature flag in config/environment.js.
  • Keep the Ember.js feature flag in config/environment.js.
  • Keep the canary version of Ember.js in package.json.
  • Keep the addition of loadInitializers in src/main.js. There are two of these lines, one for src/ and one for classic addons exporting into app/.
  • Keep the change to the fallback resolver in src/resolver.js.
  • Keep the change to import the app from ../src/main in test-helper.js.

If you have an issue after migrating an application you can likely find or file an issue:

Creating a new module unification addon

Install Ember CLI master:

npm install -g ember-cli/ember-cli#master

Generate a new app with the module unification env variable:

MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember addon my-addon

You can find a file issues for the experience of building an addon:

@cibernox
Copy link
Contributor

@mixonic The task that has a lock and my handle is also done.

@acorncom
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @cibernox I’ve noted that

@cibernox
Copy link
Contributor

@acorncom You can also check The test_helper.js files for module unification addons...

@acorncom
Copy link
Contributor

@cibernox done. As other items get done, feel free to ping me here or on Slack to help keep the ball rolling 👍

@iezer
Copy link
Contributor

iezer commented Mar 23, 2018

The checkbox about ember-maybe-import-generator-for-testing can be closed, see ember-cli/ember-maybe-import-regenerator-for-testing#2

@iezer
Copy link
Contributor

iezer commented Mar 23, 2018

@rwjblue I looked at the 2nd migrator issue:

"The migrator currently renames template-only components to not have a folder, like src/ui/components/name.hbs."

And I'm not sure that it's a real issue. More context here: ember-codemods/ember-module-migrator#72

Do you know if there is a specific case where this is an issue?

@rwjblue
Copy link
Member

rwjblue commented Mar 23, 2018

No, it was likely something fixed when pods support was added to the migrator...

@iezer
Copy link
Contributor

iezer commented Mar 23, 2018

Cool in that case that box can also be checked.

@iezer
Copy link
Contributor

iezer commented Mar 23, 2018

The first migrator task is fixed by this PR ember-codemods/ember-module-migrator#73

@voltidev
Copy link

It is fixed in the latest ember-svg-jar v1.X.X -- the src/ directory has been renamed.

@mixonic
Copy link
Member Author

mixonic commented Mar 29, 2018

Thanks @iezer for the fix and @ivanvotti for adjusting the ember-svg-jar codebase for the greater ecosystem 👏 🕺

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 2, 2018

@mixonic ember-cli/ember-load-initializers#47 should also be tracked here. I have a precursory PR that would need to be merged before taking a stab to fix this. I will try to verify this still happens today.

@mixonic
Copy link
Member Author

mixonic commented Apr 2, 2018

@efx added!

@mansona
Copy link
Member

mansona commented Apr 5, 2018

Myself and @iezer may have solved both items in the "Ember Template Compiler" section above 🤔 I think we may have skipped the first checkbox and moved straight onto the auto-interpretation ember-cli/babel-plugin-htmlbars-inline-precompile#33

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 17, 2018

@mixonic ember-cli/ember-load-initializers#47 should be fixed now thanks to @GavinJoyce .

@GavinJoyce
Copy link
Member

GavinJoyce commented May 17, 2018

The instructions for creating a MU app have changed, @mixonic perhaps you could update the quest issue description with these instructions?

Creating a new module unification app

Install Ember CLI master:

npm install -g https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli.git

Generate a new app with the module unification env variables:

MODULE_UNIFICATION=true EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember new my-mu-app

Generate a component:

EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember g component x-button

Run the app:

EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember serve

@GavinJoyce
Copy link
Member

GavinJoyce commented May 26, 2018

^ I've updated the instructions to create and run a MU app (EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true is needed when running ember serve). Perhaps someone who has edit access to the issue description could update the instructions provided in the comment above?

@cyk
Copy link

cyk commented May 30, 2018

Fix lib/models/project.js's isModuleUnification method to not only rely on presence of top level src as "the project is module unification format". Specifically, an addon may be in module unification format, but have its dummy app be in classic format.

So, a Blueprint's "module unification mode" is currently determined by the root Project's isModuleUnification (i.e., the presence of a "/src".). But the root project is unaware of the generated destination's format (e.g., tests/dummy/app). If a Blueprint knows enough to detect the destination's format (and maybe a future --dummy "custom"), would it make sense to give Blueprint it's own isModuleUnification?

Edit: Simplified.

@karthiicksiva
Copy link
Contributor

^ I've updated the instructions to create and run a MU app (EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true is needed when running ember serve). Perhaps someone who has edit access to the issue description could update the instructions provided in the comment above?

@mixonic Can you please update the issue description for ember s?

I didn't read after the description and missed @GavinJoyce comment. Thanks.

@mixonic
Copy link
Member Author

mixonic commented Jul 16, 2018

@karthiicksiva yeah I (or someone else) needs to re-confirm all the instructions above in light of the new options.

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Contributor

NullVoxPopuli commented Oct 3, 2018

Some questions about the outstanding tasks -

  • for someone new to any particular code base, where would I need to begin / what would I need to know to solve some of the tasks?

In the Ember.js PR that landed namespaces behind a feature flag, we implemented parsing of {{namespace::name}} strings at runtime. This implementation should be improved to have this work happen at Ember app build time.

What is involved in doing something at build time? where does this happen in ember.js? Where is the current parsing of {{namespace::name}} located?

If a classic app is running a version of Ember CLI that pre-dates module unification support, then an addon using module unification (with a src/ directory)must have a way a) fail gracefully or b) bring the reexport logic we use in ember-cli with it to the old version of ember-cli.

is this actionable? or is this just a thing to make sure we're doing later on?

Module unification addons re-export their top level components to app/ for classic apps. This allows an addon author to use a src/ directory and still have their addon work for either kind of app. We would like to provide addons a build-time way to configure this re-export logic. It would permit them to re-name components and services to match legacy classic APIs while they adopt new APIs for module unification apps.

what all does this involve?

hbs helpers should accept a source argument like templates in a running app do. In: https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli-htmlbars-inline-precompile

this one I've looked at before, and I could not figure out where / how the entry point worked.
Because usage is like:

layout = hbs`{{some-template}}`

and I know there is some connection with the babel transform for htmlbars.
My confusion could be just from being new to template functions, but any additional guidance / more specifics here would be super beneficial :)

:)

also, should we use a github project for managing remaining to-dos?

@aalasolutions-zz
Copy link

aalasolutions-zz commented Oct 10, 2018

Hmm, not sure where to put these, but for me writing EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true each time is hassle. I have changed my package.json file with these

"scripts": {
    "build": "EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember build",
    "lint:hbs": "ember-template-lint .",
    "lint:js": "eslint .",
    "start": "EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember serve",
    "g": "EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember g",
    "d": "EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember d",
    "test": "EMBER_CLI_MODULE_UNIFICATION=true ember test"
  },

and now I can just run npm run g component todo-item and it will generate properly ...

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Contributor

those can all be removed now. check this out: https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli/pull/8157/files

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Contributor

Some work on multiple dummy apps / isModuleUnification detection here: ember-cli/ember-cli#8158

@buschtoens
Copy link
Contributor

buschtoens commented Nov 19, 2018

@NullVoxPopuli #16373 (comment):

In the Ember.js PR that landed namespaces behind a feature flag, we implemented parsing of {{namespace::name}} strings at runtime. This implementation should be improved to have this work happen at Ember app build time.

What is involved in doing something at build time? where does this happen in ember.js? Where is the current parsing of {{namespace::name}} located?

The OP includes a link to the PR and file that implements this. ☺️

https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/pull/16319/files#diff-80f190cc4372dfc7275150e4b47cbd6bR272

Very relevant RFC: #367: "Module Unification Packages (MU with Ember Addons)"

@buschtoens
Copy link
Contributor

I found a bug with nested routes. You can't go deeper than two levels: #17217

@buschtoens
Copy link
Contributor

Found another one: #17224. Addon tests are hoisted into the consuming host application and run by ember test.

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Contributor

I hope that's related to an issue I saw the other day. Where tests remain in the prod build

@mixonic
Copy link
Member Author

mixonic commented Mar 21, 2019

In light of the updates at these links:

...I don't believe this quest issue is sure to be a valid work list. I'm closing it and I'm sure we will create new issue at the appropriate time.

@mixonic mixonic closed this as completed Mar 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests