-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Break buildURL into multiple requestType methods #2966
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this related to the PR in question?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for passing
query
along tobuildURL
; I will find that useful!I'm wondering, though, why is it passed as the
id
parameter and would it make more sense as thesnapshot
parameter? I know it's not really a snapshot, but it seems more like a snapshot than an id. Before this change,id
is eithernull
, a string, or an array of strings. With this change it can also be an object.snapshot
on the other hand, is eithernull
, an object, or an array of objects. Also, I think thequery
is used similarly as the snapshot (to fill arbitrary values in the url).For reference, here is the signature of
buildURL
:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be a breaking change for anyone currently overriding
buildURL
that is expecting it to be an actual snapshot. And I would say that the breaking change should be adding a formalquery
argument so that the signature would be:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
I just thought I would check. I don't understand how putting the using
query
instead ofnull
would break anything that usingquery
instead ofid
would, but it sounds like you've thought about this more in depth than I have.Anyway, I'm just happy to have the query available in buildURL at all. Thanks!