Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

codecov components updates #743

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024
Merged

codecov components updates #743

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

Wgil
Copy link
Contributor

@Wgil Wgil commented Aug 22, 2024

Description

Closes:

What has Changed?

What specific problem were you aiming to address, and how did you successfully resolve it? If tests were not uploaded for this pull request or if coverage decreased, please provide an explanation for the change.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Deployment Notes

Are there any specific considerations to take into account when deploying these changes? This may include new dependencies, scripts that need to be executed, or any aspects that can only be evaluated in a deployed environment.

Screenshots and Videos

Please provide any relevant before and after screenshots by uploading them here. Additionally, demo videos can be highly beneficial in demonstrating the process.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.19%. Comparing base (85297a1) to head (454393e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #743       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    7.47%   40.19%   +32.71%     
===========================================
  Files         745      624      -121     
  Lines      119599    20209    -99390     
===========================================
- Hits         8940     8123      -817     
+ Misses     109608    11065    -98543     
+ Partials     1051     1021       -30     
Components Coverage Δ
leveragelp_transactions 53.19% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_lifecycle 63.33% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_keeper 43.61% <ø> (ø)
leveragelp_queries 17.80% <ø> (+16.63%) ⬆️
accountedpool_transactions 100.00% <ø> (ø)
accountedpool_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
accountedpool_queries 68.42% <ø> (+61.49%) ⬆️
amm_transactions 57.93% <ø> (ø)
amm_lifecycle 79.16% <ø> (ø)
amm_keeper 61.13% <ø> (ø)
amm_queries 29.94% <ø> (+26.68%) ⬆️
assetprofile_transactions 78.82% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
assetprofile_keeper 83.33% <ø> (ø)
assetprofile_queries 47.41% <ø> (+42.99%) ⬆️
burner_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
burner_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
burner_queries 63.54% <ø> (+57.68%) ⬆️
clock_transactions 30.00% <ø> (ø)
clock_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
clock_keeper 76.92% <ø> (ø)
clock_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
commitment_transactions 48.95% <ø> (ø)
commitment_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
commitment_keeper 19.60% <ø> (ø)
commitment_queries 9.33% <ø> (+8.03%) ⬆️
epochs_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
epochs_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
epochs_keeper 81.81% <ø> (ø)
epochs_queries 85.71% <ø> (+81.83%) ⬆️
estaking_transactions 48.64% <ø> (ø)
estaking_lifecycle 71.23% <ø> (ø)
estaking_keeper 63.05% <ø> (ø)
estaking_queries 55.31% <ø> (+52.45%) ⬆️
incentive_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
incentive_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
incentive_keeper 0.00% <ø> (ø)
incentive_queries ∅ <ø> (∅)
masterchef_transactions 63.63% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_lifecycle 73.87% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_keeper 89.47% <ø> (ø)
masterchef_queries 44.15% <ø> (+42.40%) ⬆️
oracle_transactions 30.00% <ø> (ø)
oracle_lifecycle 0.00% <ø> (ø)
oracle_keeper 63.88% <ø> (ø)
oracle_queries 34.95% <ø> (+33.14%) ⬆️
parameter_transactions 0.00% <ø> (ø)
parameter_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
parameter_keeper 75.00% <ø> (ø)
parameter_queries 60.00% <ø> (+58.07%) ⬆️
stablestake_transactions 73.91% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_lifecycle 75.00% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_keeper 71.42% <ø> (ø)
stablestake_queries 13.04% <ø> (+11.76%) ⬆️
tier_transactions 28.57% <ø> (ø)
tier_lifecycle 100.00% <ø> (ø)
tier_keeper 90.47% <ø> (ø)
tier_queries 22.68% <ø> (+21.46%) ⬆️
tokenomics_transactions 72.32% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
tokenomics_keeper 83.33% <ø> (ø)
tokenomics_queries 70.96% <ø> (+64.26%) ⬆️
transferhook_transactions ∅ <ø> (∅)
transferhook_lifecycle ∅ <ø> (∅)
transferhook_keeper 100.00% <ø> (ø)
transferhook_queries 60.00% <ø> (+58.07%) ⬆️

@cosmic-vagabond cosmic-vagabond marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2024 14:17
@Wgil Wgil marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 20:29
@fenriz07 fenriz07 self-requested a review August 23, 2024 20:31
@Wgil Wgil merged commit 1dc0644 into main Aug 23, 2024
70 of 71 checks passed
@Wgil Wgil deleted the more-codecov-tweaks branch August 23, 2024 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants