Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Onboarding #245

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024
Merged

Onboarding #245

merged 28 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024

Conversation

elie222
Copy link
Owner

@elie222 elie222 commented Oct 14, 2024

Show users how to use the app in an onboarding flow

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component to help users generate email handling rules with AI assistance.
    • Added a form for users to input prompts and view AI-generated email categorization results.
    • Enhanced functionality for finding example email matches based on user-defined rules using AI.
    • Added a new Steps component for a streamlined onboarding process with interactive navigation.
    • New OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component for managing newsletter unsubscriptions within the onboarding flow.
    • New OnboardingFinish component to finalize the onboarding process.
    • New OnboardingColdEmailBlocker component to facilitate cold email management during onboarding.
    • New OnboardingNextButton component to navigate through onboarding steps.
    • New navigation item for "Onboarding" in the SideNav.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved user interaction with toast notifications for error handling during email rule submissions.
    • Enhanced the display of AI results in a structured table format for better clarity.
    • Updated the Onboarding component to OnboardingPage, allowing dynamic rendering based on onboarding steps.
    • Added customizable button properties to the OnboardingModal for improved user experience.
    • Streamlined routing logic in the OnboardingForm for a smoother user experience.
    • Removed the "Feature Requests" navigation item from the SideNav.
    • Updated pricing for the COPILOT_MONTHLY tier from 499 to 1500.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 14, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
inbox-zero ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 20, 2024 11:02pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from 4f9048b to ff24e91.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several new components and functionalities related to onboarding and AI assistance for email management. A new OnboardingEmailAssistant component is created to help users generate email handling rules, utilizing react-hook-form for form management and swr for data fetching. Additionally, a utility file, find-example-matches.ts, is added to facilitate finding example email matches based on specified rules using AI, incorporating Zod for schema validation. Other changes include the introduction of a Steps component for navigation, updates to the OnboardingPage structure, and enhancements to existing components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx Created OnboardingEmailAssistant component for generating email handling rules with AI assistance.
apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts Introduced functionality to find example email matches based on user-defined rules using AI.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx Added Steps component for onboarding navigation with dynamic rendering based on selected steps.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx Renamed Onboarding to OnboardingPage and restructured it for dynamic step rendering.
apps/web/components/OnboardingModal.tsx Updated OnboardingModal to accept new buttonProps for enhanced button customization.
apps/web/components/SideNav.tsx Added new navigation item for "Onboarding" and commented out "Feature Requests" item.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx Introduced OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component for managing newsletter unsubscriptions.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingFinish.tsx Added OnboardingFinish component for finalizing the onboarding process with navigation.
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/form.tsx Updated routing logic in OnboardingForm to redirect to /onboarding after submission.
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx Modified user property access in WelcomePage to use completedOnboardingAt.
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241020163727_app_onboarding/migration.sql Added new columns for tracking onboarding completion timestamps in the User table.
apps/web/prisma/schema.prisma Updated Prisma schema to deprecate completedOnboarding and add new timestamp fields.
apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts Modified onboarding actions to update new timestamp fields and enhance error handling.
apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx Enhanced ColdEmailForm component with structured form handling using react-hook-form.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx Introduced OnboardingColdEmailBlocker component for onboarding cold email blocking.
apps/web/app/(landing)/components/page.tsx Added TypographyH4 component for improved typography demonstration.
apps/web/components/ui/tabs.tsx Modified Tabs component for safer initialization of searchParams.
apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts Updated pricing for COPILOT_MONTHLY tier from 499 to 1500.
apps/web/app/(landing)/home/CTAButtons.tsx Removed feature flag logic from CTAButtons, hardcoding button text to "Get Started".
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome-upgrade/page.tsx Commented out trial feature texts in WelcomeUpgradePage.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix to in email forwarding. Extract forwarding template #238: The changes in this PR enhance the email forwarding functionality, which is relevant to the OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx as it also deals with user interactions related to email management and utilizes similar concepts of handling email content.

🐇 In the garden where code does bloom,
Guidelines sprout, dispelling the gloom.
With components new, our steps align,
Onboarding's a breeze, all tasks divine!
So hop along, let’s code with cheer,
In TypeScript's embrace, we have nothing to fear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 18

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (4)

40-43: LGTM: Component structure is well-organized. Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.

The overall component structure using Card and Table components is clean and appropriate. The Suspense wrapper around OnboardingNextButton is correctly implemented.

To enhance accessibility, consider adding ARIA attributes to the main container div:

- <div className="relative">
+ <div className="relative" role="region" aria-label="Bulk Unsubscriber">

This change will improve screen reader navigation and provide context for the content within this component.

Also applies to: 79-85


43-78: LGTM: Table structure is well-implemented. Consider using constants for column names.

The table structure is well-defined and uses appropriate components from the UI library. The use of the map function to generate table rows is a good practice.

To improve maintainability and consistency, consider defining column names as constants:

const COLUMNS = {
  EMAIL: 'Email',
  EMAILS: 'Emails',
  READ: 'Read',
  ARCHIVED: 'Archived',
  ACTION: 'Action',
} as const;

// Then use these constants in the TableHeader
<TableHead>{COLUMNS.EMAIL}</TableHead>
<TableHead>{COLUMNS.EMAILS}</TableHead>
// ... and so on

This approach makes it easier to update column names consistently across the component and improves code readability.


81-83: Consider adding a fallback UI for the Suspense boundary.

The Suspense wrapper around OnboardingNextButton is correctly implemented, suggesting that this component might be loaded asynchronously or have its own loading state. However, there's no fallback UI provided, which could lead to a jarring user experience if the component takes time to load.

To improve the user experience, consider adding a fallback UI:

- <Suspense>
+ <Suspense fallback={<div className="h-10 w-full bg-gray-200 animate-pulse rounded"></div>}>
    <OnboardingNextButton />
  </Suspense>

This change will show a pulsing placeholder while the OnboardingNextButton is loading, providing visual feedback to the user and maintaining layout stability.


1-86: Summary: Well-structured component with room for production-ready improvements

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-implemented and provides a good foundation for the bulk unsubscribe functionality. Here's a summary of the main points from the review:

  1. The overall structure and use of React hooks are appropriate.
  2. Consider moving sample data out of the component and implementing real data fetching.
  3. The table structure and row rendering are well-implemented, but could benefit from using constants for column names.
  4. Implement real unsubscribe functionality with API calls.
  5. For large lists, consider using virtualization to improve performance.
  6. Add a fallback UI for the Suspense wrapper around OnboardingNextButton.
  7. Enhance accessibility by adding ARIA attributes to the main container.

Addressing these points will make the component more robust, performant, and production-ready.

As you continue to develop this feature, consider the following architectural aspects:

  • Error handling and user feedback for failed unsubscribe actions.
  • Pagination or infinite scrolling for very large lists of emails.
  • Batch unsubscribe functionality to improve efficiency for users wanting to unsubscribe from multiple emails at once.
  • Integration with a state management solution (e.g., Redux, Recoil) if this component needs to share its state with other parts of the application.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding-old2/page.tsx (2)

42-57: LGTM: Well-structured Onboarding component with room for minor improvement.

The Onboarding component is well-organized and effectively uses custom components for consistent layout and styling. The grid structure for displaying labels is a good approach for responsive design.

Consider extracting the hardcoded strings (like "Onboarding" and the description) into constants or a separate localization file. This would make it easier to maintain and potentially support multiple languages in the future.

Would you like a code snippet demonstrating how to extract these strings?


1-84: Summary: Onboarding component is a good start, but needs refinement.

The Onboarding component provides a solid foundation for guiding users through label selection. However, there are several areas for improvement:

  1. Unused variables (OTHER_POTENTIAL_LABELS) should be removed or utilized.
  2. Consider implementing the suggested AI-based category generation.
  3. Enhance type safety and prop passing, especially for the LabelItem components.
  4. Implement proper state management and event handling for label selection and the "Next" button.
  5. Extract hardcoded strings for better maintainability and potential localization.

These refinements will help create a more robust and user-friendly onboarding experience, better aligning with the PR's objective of showing users how to use the app effectively.

Consider breaking down this component into smaller, more focused components (e.g., LabelSelector, OnboardingNavigation) to improve maintainability and reusability. This will also make it easier to add more steps to the onboarding process in the future.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (3)

1-20: LGTM! Consider grouping imports for better organization.

The component declaration and imports look good. The "use client" directive is correctly placed, and the prop types are well-defined.

Consider grouping the imports for better organization:

  1. External libraries (React, Next.js)
  2. Internal components
  3. Utility functions

Example:

"use client";

import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import { PlayCircleIcon } from "lucide-react";

import { SectionDescription, TypographyH3 } from "@/components/Typography";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";

import { cn } from "@/utils";

38-56: LGTM! Consider extracting magic numbers for better maintainability.

The styling and visual structure of each step are well-implemented. The use of the cn utility for conditional styling is a good practice, and the visual differentiation between active and inactive steps is clear.

Consider extracting magic numbers into named constants for better readability and maintainability. For example:

const LAST_STEP_HEIGHT = 'h-6';
const CONNECTOR_LINE_BOTTOM = '-bottom-6';
const STEP_INDICATOR_SIZE = 'h-1.5 w-1.5';

// Then use these constants in your JSX
<div
  className={cn(
    stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? LAST_STEP_HEIGHT : CONNECTOR_LINE_BOTTOM,
    "absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
  )}
>
  {/* ... */}
</div>

<div className={`${STEP_INDICATOR_SIZE} rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300`} />

This approach makes it easier to adjust these values in the future if needed.


57-75: LGTM! Consider enhancing the video button for better UX.

The content rendering for each step is well-structured and implemented. The use of custom typography components promotes consistency, and the conditional rendering of the video button is correct.

To enhance the user experience, consider adding a tooltip to the "Watch video" button to provide more context. You could use a tooltip component from your UI library or implement a simple title attribute. Here's an example:

{step.videoUrl && (
  <Button
    variant="outline"
    onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank")}
    title={`Watch video guide for ${step.title}`} // Add this line
  >
    <PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
    Watch video
  </Button>
)}

This addition will give users more information about what the video contains before they click the button.

apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (2)

154-156: LGTM: Improved clarity in CardTitle

The change from "your emails" to "incoming emails" in the CardTitle is a good improvement. It provides more specificity and aligns better with the purpose of the component.

Consider wrapping the CardTitle text in a single line for better readability:

<CardTitle>How your AI personal assistant should handle incoming emails</CardTitle>

179-180: LGTM: Updated placeholder text with consistent example and added new complex rule

The changes in the placeholder text are good:

  1. The Cal link update maintains consistency with the earlier change.
  2. The new example about reviewing emails from [email protected] adds diversity and showcases more complex rule possibilities.

Consider breaking the new example into multiple lines for better readability:

placeholder={`Here's an example of what your prompt might look like.
You can use the examples on the right or come up with your own.
Feel free to add as many as you want:

* Label and archive newsletters as "Newsletter".
* Archive all marketing emails.
* Label receipts as "Receipt" and forward them to [email protected].
* Label emails that require a reply as "Reply Required".
* If a customer asks to set up a call, send them my Cal link: https://cal.com/example
* Review any emails from [email protected] and see if any are about finance.
  If so, respond with a friendly draft a reply that answers the question.`}
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (3)

27-27: Replace placeholder video URL with actual content

The videoUrl for the "Bulk Unsubscriber" step is set to "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ", which appears to be a placeholder link. Please update it with the correct video URL for this onboarding step or remove it if a video is not available yet.


34-34: Replace placeholder video URL with actual content

The videoUrl for the "AI Personal Assistant" step is set to "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ", which appears to be a placeholder link. Please update it with the appropriate video URL for this onboarding step or remove it if a video is not available yet.


38-43: Ensure consistent structure: Add videoUrl to the third step

In the steps array, the first two steps include a videoUrl property, but the third step ("Cold Emailer Blocker") does not. For consistency and future scalability, consider adding a videoUrl property to the third step, even if it's a placeholder or set to null.

.cursorrules (1)

Line range hint 68-85: Align error handling with recommended patterns

According to the guidelines, when handling server action results, use isActionError with toastError and toastSuccess. In the onSubmit function, consider updating the error handling to follow this pattern instead of using handleActionResult.

Here's how you can modify the error handling:

 import { toastError, toastSuccess } from "@/components/Toast";
 
 const onSubmit: SubmitHandler<ProcessHistoryOptions> = useCallback(
   async (data) => {
     const result = await processHistoryAction(data.email);
-    handleActionResult(result, `Processed history for ${data.email}`);
+    if (isActionError(result)) {
+      toastError({
+        title: "Error processing history",
+        description: result.error,
+      });
+    } else {
+      toastSuccess({ description: `Processed history for ${data.email}` });
+    }
   },
-  []
+  [processHistoryAction]
 );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab2fa66 and ac06483.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .cursorrules (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding-old2/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx

[error] 3-4: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx

[error] 9-9: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1)

1-5: LGTM: Component structure and naming.

The overall structure of the OnboardingColdEmailBlocker component is clean and follows good practices. The component name is descriptive and follows the PascalCase convention, which is appropriate for React components.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx (4)

1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.

The import statements are correctly structured, following the convention of third-party imports first (Next.js), followed by local imports. All necessary components and hooks for the OnboardingNextButton functionality are properly imported.


14-14: Reconsider the use of scroll={false} on the Link component.

The scroll={false} prop prevents the page from scrolling to the top when navigating to the next step. While this can be desirable in some cases, it might lead to a suboptimal user experience if important content in the next step is below the fold.

Consider if this behavior is intentional and consistent with the overall onboarding flow design. If you're unsure about the implications, you may want to test the user experience with and without this prop.


12-12: LGTM: Appropriate use of Tailwind CSS for styling.

The component correctly uses Tailwind CSS for styling, applying a top margin (mt-4) to the wrapping div. This approach is consistent with modern React development practices and provides flexibility for responsive design.


1-20: Overall, well-implemented component with minor suggestions for improvement.

The OnboardingNextButton component is well-structured and effectively uses Next.js features for client-side navigation in an onboarding flow. The code is clean, and the use of Tailwind CSS for styling is appropriate.

Consider implementing the suggested improvements for more robust step parameter parsing and error handling. Also, review the use of scroll={false} to ensure it aligns with the intended user experience across all onboarding steps.

These minor enhancements will further improve the component's reliability and maintainability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 9-9: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (1)

11-15: LGTM: Well-defined schema and type inference

The emailAssistantSchema is correctly defined using zod, enforcing a non-empty string for the prompt. The type inference for EmailAssistantInputs is a good practice, ensuring type safety and consistency between the schema and the form inputs.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

1-16: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.

The "use client" directive, imports, and component declaration are correctly implemented. The code follows best practices for a client-side rendered React component in a Next.js application.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding-old2/page.tsx (1)

1-8: LGTM: File directive and imports are well-structured.

The "use client" directive is correctly placed, and the imports are appropriately organized. The component imports align with the elements used in the Onboarding component.

apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (2)

43-43: LGTM: Updated Cal link to use a generic example

The change from "https://cal.com/max" to "https://cal.com/example" in the example prompt is appropriate. It provides a more generic example, which is better for documentation and user interfaces.


Line range hint 1-265: Overall assessment: Changes improve clarity and user guidance

The modifications in this file align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the onboarding flow. The changes to the example prompts, card title, and placeholder text provide clearer guidance and more diverse examples for users setting up email handling rules.

Key improvements:

  1. Updated Cal link to a generic example
  2. More specific card title mentioning "incoming emails"
  3. Added a complex rule example in the placeholder text

These changes should help users better understand and utilize the AI personal assistant feature for handling incoming emails.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1)

13-18: Great use of clear and engaging introductory text

The page heading and introductory paragraph are well-crafted, effectively guiding the user and setting a positive tone for the onboarding process.

.cursorrules (1)

68-69: ⚠️ Potential issue

Include dependencies in the useCallback dependency array

The useCallback hook depends on processHistoryAction and handleActionResult. To ensure proper memoization and avoid potential bugs, include these dependencies in the dependency array.

Apply this diff to include the dependencies:

 const onSubmit: SubmitHandler<ProcessHistoryOptions> = useCallback(
   async (data) => {
     const result = await processHistoryAction(data.email);
     handleActionResult(result, `Processed history for ${data.email}`);
   },
-  []
+  [processHistoryAction, handleActionResult]
 );

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Comment on lines 1 to 5
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";

export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker() {
return <Button>Enable</Button>;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider expanding the component for a more comprehensive onboarding experience.

The current implementation is quite minimal for an onboarding flow. Consider adding more elements to guide the user through the process of enabling the cold email blocker. This could include:

  1. A brief explanation of what cold emails are and why blocking them is beneficial.
  2. Steps or a visual guide on how the blocker works.
  3. Options for customizing the blocker's behavior.
  4. A way to skip this step if the user doesn't want to enable it right away.

Here's a basic example of how you might expand this component:

import { useState } from 'react';
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";

export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker() {
  const [isEnabled, setIsEnabled] = useState(false);

  const handleEnable = () => {
    // Logic to enable the cold email blocker
    setIsEnabled(true);
  };

  return (
    <div className="space-y-4">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Cold Email Blocker</h2>
      <p>Automatically filter out unsolicited emails to keep your inbox clean and focused.</p>
      
      {!isEnabled ? (
        <Button onClick={handleEnable}>Enable Cold Email Blocker</Button>
      ) : (
        <p className="text-green-600">Cold Email Blocker is now enabled!</p>
      )}
      
      <Button variant="ghost">Skip for now</Button>
    </div>
  );
}

This expanded version provides more context, shows the state of the blocker, and allows users to skip if desired.

import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";

export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker() {
return <Button>Enable</Button>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add onClick handler and consider providing more context.

The button currently lacks functionality. Consider adding an onClick handler to actually enable the cold email blocker when clicked. Additionally, it might be helpful to provide more context to the user about what enabling this feature means.

Here's a suggested improvement:

- return <Button>Enable</Button>;
+ return (
+   <div>
+     <p>Block unwanted cold emails to keep your inbox clean.</p>
+     <Button onClick={() => handleEnableColdEmailBlocker()}>Enable Cold Email Blocker</Button>
+   </div>
+ );

Don't forget to implement the handleEnableColdEmailBlocker function to perform the actual enabling action.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 1 to 9
"use client";

import { Suspense } from "react";
import { useForm, SubmitHandler } from "react-hook-form";
import { zodResolver } from "@hookform/resolvers/zod";
import { z } from "zod";
import { OnboardingNextButton } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton";
import { Input } from "@/components/Input";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize Suspense import for better performance

Consider using import type for the Suspense import to ensure it's removed by transpilers, potentially improving bundle size and load times.

Apply this change:

-import { Suspense } from "react";
+import type { Suspense } from "react";
+import { Suspense as SuspenseComponent } from "react";

Then update the usage on line 22 to:

<SuspenseComponent>

This change ensures type information is preserved while allowing better tree-shaking of unused imports.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 3-4: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Comment on lines 22 to 37
return (
<ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={stepIdx}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve accessibility for keyboard navigation.

The structure of the component looks good, but there's an accessibility concern with the onClick handler on the <li> element.

To improve accessibility:

  1. Use a focusable element (like a button) for the clickable area instead of the <li>.
  2. Add keyboard event handlers (onKeyDown or onKeyUp) to support keyboard navigation.

Here's a suggested implementation:

<li key={stepIdx} className="relative flex gap-x-4">
  <button
    onClick={() => {
      if (!step.active) {
        router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
          scroll: false,
        });
      }
    }}
    onKeyDown={(e) => {
      if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
        e.preventDefault();
        if (!step.active) {
          router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
            scroll: false,
          });
        }
      }
    }}
    className="flex-1 text-left" // Ensure the button spans the full width and aligns text to the left
    disabled={step.active}
  >
    {/* Existing content */}
  </button>
</li>

This change will make the component more accessible and address the static analysis hint about using key events with click events.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

Comment on lines 1 to 81
"use client";

import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import { PlayCircleIcon } from "lucide-react";
import { SectionDescription, TypographyH3 } from "@/components/Typography";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
import { cn } from "@/utils";

export function Steps({
steps,
}: {
steps: {
title: string;
description: string;
content: React.ReactNode;
videoUrl?: string;
active: boolean;
}[];
}) {
const router = useRouter();

return (
<ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={stepIdx}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
<div
className={cn(
stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? "h-6" : "-bottom-6",
"absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
)}
>
<div className="w-px bg-gray-200" />
</div>

<div className="relative flex h-6 w-6 flex-none items-center justify-center bg-white">
<div className="h-1.5 w-1.5 rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300" />
</div>

<div
className={cn(
"flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
step.active ? "opacity-100" : "opacity-30",
)}
>
<div className="flex justify-between gap-4">
<div>
<TypographyH3>{step.title}</TypographyH3>
<SectionDescription>{step.description}</SectionDescription>
</div>

<div className="flex items-center">
{step.videoUrl && (
<Button
variant="outline"
onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank")}
>
<PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
Watch video
</Button>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div className="mt-4">{step.content}</div>
</div>
</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider refactoring for improved maintainability and reusability.

The Steps component is well-implemented and follows React best practices. However, as it grows in complexity, consider the following refactoring suggestions to improve maintainability and reusability:

  1. Extract sub-components:

    • Create a Step component for individual step rendering.
    • Create a VideoButton component for the "Watch video" functionality.
  2. Use React's useCallback for memoizing the onClick handler to optimize performance.

  3. Consider using the useMemo hook to memoize the steps array if it's being recalculated on every render.

  4. Implement error boundaries to handle potential errors in step content rendering.

Here's a basic example of how you might refactor the Step component:

const Step = React.memo(({ step, index, totalSteps, onStepClick }) => {
  // ... implement step rendering logic here
});

export function Steps({ steps }: StepsProps) {
  const router = useRouter();

  const handleStepClick = useCallback((index: number) => {
    router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${index + 1}`, { scroll: false });
  }, [router]);

  return (
    <ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
      {steps.map((step, index) => (
        <Step
          key={index}
          step={step}
          index={index}
          totalSteps={steps.length}
          onStepClick={handleStepClick}
        />
      ))}
    </ul>
  );
}

These refactoring suggestions can help improve the component's maintainability and performance as the onboarding flow grows more complex.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these refactoring suggestions?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

import { Steps } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps";
import { OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber";
import { OnboardingColdEmailBlocker } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker";
import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The import statement at line 5 imports OnboardingAIEmailAssistant from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant", but the file path seems inconsistent with the component name. It should likely be "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant".

Apply this diff to fix the import path:

-import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
+import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.cursorrules Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (2)

22-24: Remove redundant role="list" attribute.

The role="list" attribute on the <ul> element is redundant, as it's already implied by the semantic <ul> element. Remove it to improve code cleanliness.

- <ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
+ <ul className="space-y-6">

Also applies to: 78-81

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


38-76: LGTM: Step content rendering is well-implemented.

The step content rendering is well-structured and uses appropriate conditional styling. The use of utility functions like cn for managing class names is a good practice.

Minor suggestion for the video button:
Consider adding rel="noopener noreferrer" to the window.open call for security reasons when opening links in new tabs:

onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank", "noopener,noreferrer")}

This prevents the new page from accessing the window.opener property and ensures referrer information isn't passed, enhancing security.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (1)

79-80: Consider renaming onSubmitForm for clarity

To improve readability, consider renaming onSubmitForm to handleFormSubmit or onFormSubmit to clearly indicate its purpose as the form submission handler.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac06483 and 448f883.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (4 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx

[error] 2-3: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1)

1-21: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.

The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the Steps component is declared with a well-defined prop type, enhancing type safety.

apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx (1)

23-78: Well-structured component with proper typings

The RadioGroup component is well-designed with appropriate TypeScript generics and integrates seamlessly with @headlessui/react and react-hook-form. Props are clearly defined, and the use of utility classes ensures maintainable styling.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (5)

4-4: Importing Controller and related hooks from react-hook-form

The addition of Controller, SubmitHandler, and useForm from react-hook-form is appropriate for managing form state and integrating controlled components.


21-21: Importing RadioGroup component

The import of RadioGroup from "@/components/RadioGroup" aligns with its usage within the form and enhances the user interface.


45-47: Exporting ColdEmailForm component

Exporting the ColdEmailForm function allows it to be reused in other parts of the application. Ensure that this component needs to be accessible externally and that its usage is properly managed.


54-56: Setting default form values correctly

The defaultValues in useForm are properly set, ensuring that coldEmailBlocker defaults to ColdEmailSetting.DISABLED if no value is provided in props.


112-123: Integrating RadioGroup with form control effectively

Using Controller to wrap RadioGroup integrates the form state with the UI component effectively. Spreading {...field} passes necessary input props, and error={errors.coldEmailBlocker} ensures validation errors are displayed appropriately.

Comment on lines 25 to 37
<li
key={stepIdx}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve accessibility and key usage in step rendering.

  1. Enhance keyboard accessibility by using a <button> element instead of attaching the onClick handler directly to the <li>.
  2. Add keyboard event handling for better accessibility.
  3. Use a unique identifier for the key prop instead of the array index, if possible.

Here's a suggested implementation:

{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
  <li key={step.title} className="relative flex gap-x-4">
    <button
      onClick={() => {
        if (!step.active) {
          router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
            scroll: false,
          });
        }
      }}
      onKeyDown={(e) => {
        if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
          e.preventDefault();
          if (!step.active) {
            router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
              scroll: false,
            });
          }
        }
      }}
      className="flex-1 text-left"
      disabled={step.active}
    >
      {/* Existing content */}
    </button>
  </li>
))}

This change addresses the accessibility issues and improves the component's usability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

Comment on lines 1 to 81
"use client";

import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import { PlayCircleIcon } from "lucide-react";
import { SectionDescription, TypographyH3 } from "@/components/Typography";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
import { cn } from "@/utils";

export function Steps({
steps,
}: {
steps: {
title: string;
description: string;
content: React.ReactNode;
videoUrl?: string;
active: boolean;
}[];
}) {
const router = useRouter();

return (
<ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={stepIdx}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
<div
className={cn(
stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? "h-6" : "-bottom-6",
"absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
)}
>
<div className="w-px bg-gray-200" />
</div>

<div className="relative flex h-6 w-6 flex-none items-center justify-center bg-white">
<div className="h-1.5 w-1.5 rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300" />
</div>

<div
className={cn(
"flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
step.active ? "opacity-100" : "opacity-20",
)}
>
<div className="flex justify-between gap-4">
<div>
<TypographyH3>{step.title}</TypographyH3>
<SectionDescription>{step.description}</SectionDescription>
</div>

<div className="flex items-center">
{step.videoUrl && (
<Button
variant="outline"
onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank")}
>
<PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
Watch video
</Button>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div className="mt-4">{step.content}</div>
</div>
</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Overall: Good implementation with room for improvement.

The Steps component effectively implements a step-based navigation for an onboarding flow. It's visually appealing and uses Next.js routing appropriately. However, there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Accessibility: Address the issues mentioned in previous comments to enhance keyboard navigation.
  2. Best practices: Use unique keys for list items and remove redundant ARIA attributes.

Consider the following refactoring suggestions to improve maintainability:

  1. Extract a Step sub-component for individual step rendering.
  2. Create a VideoButton component for the "Watch video" functionality.
  3. Use React's useCallback for memoizing the onClick handler.
  4. Consider using useMemo to memoize the steps array if it's being recalculated on every render.

Example of extracting a Step component:

const Step = React.memo(({ step, index, totalSteps, onStepClick }) => {
  // ... implement step rendering logic here
});

export function Steps({ steps }: StepsProps) {
  const router = useRouter();

  const handleStepClick = useCallback((index: number) => {
    router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${index + 1}`, { scroll: false });
  }, [router]);

  return (
    <ul className="space-y-6">
      {steps.map((step, index) => (
        <Step
          key={step.title}
          step={step}
          index={index}
          totalSteps={steps.length}
          onStepClick={handleStepClick}
        />
      ))}
    </ul>
  );
}

These refactoring suggestions can help improve the component's maintainability and performance as the onboarding flow grows more complex.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these refactoring suggestions?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 23-23: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 25-37: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 26-26: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 81 to 105
const options: {
value: ColdEmailSetting;
label: string;
description: string;
}[] = useMemo(
() => [
{
label: 'Archive and label as "Cold Email"',
value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
label: "Archive & Label",
description: "Archive and label cold emails",
},
{
label: 'Label as "Cold Email"',
value: ColdEmailSetting.LABEL,
label: "Label Only",
description: "Label cold emails as 'Cold Email', but keep in inbox",
},
{
label: "Only list here",
value: ColdEmailSetting.LIST,
label: "List in App",
description: "List cold emails in app. Make no changes to inbox.",
},
{
label: "Disabled",
value: ColdEmailSetting.DISABLED,
label: "Turn Off",
description: "Disable cold email detection",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Unnecessary use of useMemo for static options

The options array is wrapped in useMemo without any dependencies, which is unnecessary because the options are static and do not change between renders. Removing useMemo can simplify the code without affecting performance.

Apply this diff to remove useMemo:

   }[] = useMemo(
-    () => [
+    [
       {
         value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
         label: "Archive & Label",
         description: "Archive and label cold emails",
       },
       {
         value: ColdEmailSetting.LABEL,
         label: "Label Only",
         description: "Label cold emails as 'Cold Email', but keep in inbox",
       },
       {
         value: ColdEmailSetting.LIST,
         label: "List in App",
         description: "List cold emails in app. Make no changes to inbox.",
       },
       {
         value: ColdEmailSetting.DISABLED,
         label: "Turn Off",
         description: "Disable cold email detection",
       },
-    ],
-    [],
-  );
+    ];
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const options: {
value: ColdEmailSetting;
label: string;
description: string;
}[] = useMemo(
() => [
{
label: 'Archive and label as "Cold Email"',
value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
label: "Archive & Label",
description: "Archive and label cold emails",
},
{
label: 'Label as "Cold Email"',
value: ColdEmailSetting.LABEL,
label: "Label Only",
description: "Label cold emails as 'Cold Email', but keep in inbox",
},
{
label: "Only list here",
value: ColdEmailSetting.LIST,
label: "List in App",
description: "List cold emails in app. Make no changes to inbox.",
},
{
label: "Disabled",
value: ColdEmailSetting.DISABLED,
label: "Turn Off",
description: "Disable cold email detection",
const options: {
value: ColdEmailSetting;
label: string;
description: string;
}[] = [
{
value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
label: "Archive & Label",
description: "Archive and label cold emails",
},
{
value: ColdEmailSetting.LABEL,
label: "Label Only",
description: "Label cold emails as 'Cold Email', but keep in inbox",
},
{
value: ColdEmailSetting.LIST,
label: "List in App",
description: "List cold emails in app. Make no changes to inbox.",
},
{
value: ColdEmailSetting.DISABLED,
label: "Turn Off",
description: "Disable cold email detection",
},
];

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1)

52-90: LGTM: Step content rendering is well-implemented

The step content rendering is logically structured and uses utility functions for class names, which is good for maintainability. Consider extracting the step content into a separate component for improved readability and reusability.

const StepContent = ({ step, onVideoClick }) => (
  <div className={cn(
    "flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
    step.active ? "opacity-100" : "pointer-events-none opacity-20",
  )}>
    {/* Existing content */}
  </div>
);

This refactoring is optional but could make the main component easier to read and maintain.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/TestRules.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-3: Address file duplication and suggest refactoring.

The comment indicates that this file is a copy of automation/TestRules.tsx. While this approach might have been necessary for quick implementation, it introduces code duplication which can lead to maintenance issues in the future.

Consider the following steps to improve code organization and reduce duplication:

  1. Identify common components and utilities used in both files.
  2. Extract these shared elements into a separate file, possibly in a common directory.
  3. Import the shared components in both automation/TestRules.tsx and cold-email-blocker/TestRules.tsx.
  4. Refactor any remaining duplicated code to use the shared components.

This refactoring will improve maintainability and ensure consistency between the two features. Would you like assistance in identifying potential shared components or creating a plan for this refactoring?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 448f883 and 9b6fac7.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailPromptModal.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/TestRules.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx

[error] 9-9: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx

[error] 34-34: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 37-37: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx

[error] 26-26: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

🔇 Additional comments (19)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1)

1-6: LGTM: Imports and component structure are well-organized.

The "use client" directive is correctly used, and the necessary imports are in place. The component is properly exported as a named function, following React best practices.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (4)

17-22: Well-structured introduction to onboarding

The new heading and paragraph provide a clear and concise introduction to the onboarding process, aligning well with the PR objective of guiding users through the app's functionality.


1-70: Well-structured and comprehensive onboarding flow

The restructured OnboardingPage component provides a clear and organized step-by-step onboarding experience. The use of sub-components for each step and the Steps component for navigation creates a modular and maintainable structure. This implementation aligns well with the PR objective of guiding users through the app's functionality.

Great job on improving the onboarding process!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 26-26: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)


6-6: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The import statement for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant seems to have an inconsistent file path. The component name suggests it should be imported from a file named OnboardingAIEmailAssistant, but the current import path uses OnboardingEmailAssistant.

Apply this diff to fix the import path:

-import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
+import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";

11-15: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update type definition for optional step parameter

The step property in searchParams is used in conditions where it might be undefined. To accurately reflect this, the type definition should be updated to make step optional.

Apply this diff to adjust the type definition:

 export default function OnboardingPage({
   searchParams,
 }: {
-  searchParams: { step: string };
+  searchParams: { step?: string };
 }) {
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (2)

1-22: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.

The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the Steps component is declared with proper TypeScript typing. The use of the "use client" directive is correct for a Client Component in Next.js.


1-95: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with room for improvement

The Steps component effectively implements a step-based navigation for an onboarding flow. It's visually appealing and uses Next.js routing appropriately. The main areas for improvement are:

  1. Accessibility: Enhance keyboard navigation and remove redundant ARIA attributes.
  2. Performance: Optimize hook dependencies and consider memoization for frequently recalculated values.
  3. Structure: Break down the component into smaller, reusable parts for better maintainability.
  4. Best practices: Use unique keys for list items and improve error handling.

Implementing the suggested changes will result in a more robust, accessible, and performant component. Great work on the initial implementation, and these refinements will take it to the next level!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 34-34: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 37-37: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailPromptModal.tsx (4)

32-32: Confirm visual consistency with new Button variant

The Button component's props have been updated from color="white" to variant="outline". This change aligns with modern component libraries that use variants for styling.

Please verify that the visual appearance of the button still matches the intended design. If there are any discrepancies, consider adjusting the variant or adding custom styles as needed.


105-105: Verify button size after removing size prop

The size prop has been removed from the Button component in the form submission. This simplification is good for maintaining consistency with default styles.

Please confirm that the button's default size still fits well within the form layout and maintains visual harmony with other elements. If adjustments are needed, consider using CSS classes or a size variant if available.


Line range hint 1-109: Summary of changes in ColdEmailPromptModal.tsx

The changes in this file primarily focus on updating the Button component usage, which appears to be part of a larger effort to standardize UI components across the application. The modifications include:

  1. Updated import path for the Button component.
  2. Changed Button props from color="white" to variant="outline".
  3. Removed the size prop from the form submission Button.

These changes should improve consistency and maintainability of the UI components. The overall structure and functionality of the ColdEmailPromptModal and ColdEmailPromptForm components remain unchanged.

To ensure these changes integrate well with the rest of the application, please:

  1. Verify that the new Button import is used consistently across the codebase.
  2. Confirm that the visual appearance of the buttons still matches the intended design.
  3. Check that the form layout remains visually balanced after removing the button size prop.

These updates align well with the PR objective of improving the onboarding flow, as they contribute to a more consistent and maintainable UI.


6-6: Verify consistency of Button import across the codebase

The import statement for the Button component has been updated to use a new path. This change likely reflects a restructuring of the component library.

Please run the following script to ensure this change has been applied consistently across the entire codebase:

If the first command returns any results, those files need to be updated. The second command should show the new import statement being used consistently.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (7)

4-4: LGTM: Improved form control with react-hook-form

The addition of Controller from react-hook-form is a good practice. It allows for better integration of form controls with the form's state management.


14-21: LGTM: New components for enhanced UI

The addition of Button, RadioGroup, and ColdEmailPromptModal components suggests an improved user interface, which aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing the onboarding flow.


Line range hint 32-37: LGTM: Enhanced ColdEmailSettings component

The addition of TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal components enriches the functionality of the ColdEmailSettings component. This improvement aligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing the onboarding flow.


45-51: LGTM: Improved ColdEmailForm component signature

The changes to the ColdEmailForm component signature are beneficial:

  1. Exporting the component enhances modularity and reusability.
  2. The new optional onSuccess prop allows for custom behavior after successful form submission, improving flexibility.

These changes contribute to a more versatile and maintainable codebase.


53-60: LGTM: Improved form initialization

The changes in form initialization are well-implemented:

  1. Using control from react-hook-form aligns with best practices for form management.
  2. Setting a default value for coldEmailBlocker ensures the form always has a valid state.

These improvements contribute to a more robust and predictable form behavior.


78-85: LGTM: Enhanced form submission logic

The changes in form submission logic are beneficial:

  1. The addition of the onSuccess callback allows for custom behavior after successful form submission, improving component flexibility.
  2. The introduction of onSubmitForm improves code readability by clearly separating form submission logic.

These changes contribute to a more maintainable and extensible component.


86-128: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

LGTM with suggestion: Improved radio group options and rendering

The changes in radio group options and rendering are well-implemented:

  1. Adding descriptions to radio options improves user understanding.
  2. Replacing the Select component with RadioGroup is more appropriate for this type of selection.
  3. Using Controller for form integration aligns with react-hook-form best practices.

These improvements enhance both the user experience and code quality.

However, there's an opportunity for a minor optimization:

The useMemo hook for options is unnecessary as the array is static. Consider removing it to simplify the code:

-  const options: {
-    value: ColdEmailSetting;
-    label: string;
-    description: string;
-  }[] = useMemo(
-    () => [
+  const options: {
+    value: ColdEmailSetting;
+    label: string;
+    description: string;
+  }[] = [
     {
       value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
       label: "Archive & Label",
       description: "Archive and label cold emails",
     },
     // ... other options ...
-    ],
-    [],
-  );
+  ];

This change will not affect functionality but will slightly improve code clarity and performance.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/TestRules.tsx (1)

35-38: Approve Button prop change and suggest consistency check.

The update from color="white" to variant="outline" for the Button component reflects a more flexible and standardized approach to styling. This change aligns well with modern design system practices.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining color props on Button components and new variant props

# Test: Search for old color prop usage on Button components
rg --type typescript --type tsx '<Button.*color=["'\''][^"'\'']+["'\'']'

# Test: Verify new variant prop usage on Button components
rg --type typescript --type tsx '<Button.*variant=["'\'']outline["'\'']'

This will help identify any Button components that may still be using the old color prop and confirm the usage of the new variant prop.

Comment on lines 7 to 9
const router = useRouter();
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
const step = parseInt(searchParams.get("step") || "1");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve parseInt usage for better compatibility and clarity.

The current use of parseInt without a radix parameter could lead to unexpected results in some cases. Consider using Number.parseInt with a radix for better clarity and to align with modern JavaScript practices.

Here's a suggested improvement:

const step = Number.parseInt(searchParams.get("step") || "1", 10);

This change addresses the static analysis hint and makes the code more robust.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 9-9: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

Comment on lines 11 to 19
return (
<div>
<ColdEmailForm
onSuccess={() => {
router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
}}
/>
</div>
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance user experience with additional context and guidance.

While the current implementation is functional, it could benefit from providing more context to the user about the Cold Email Blocker feature. Consider adding:

  1. A brief explanation of what the Cold Email Blocker does and its benefits.
  2. Instructions on how to use the form.
  3. An option to skip this step if the user isn't ready to set it up.

Here's a suggested improvement:

return (
  <div className="space-y-4">
    <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Set Up Cold Email Blocker</h2>
    <p>Protect your inbox from unwanted cold emails. This feature automatically filters out unsolicited messages, keeping your focus on important communications.</p>
    <ColdEmailForm
      onSuccess={() => {
        router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
      }}
    />
    <button onClick={() => router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`)} className="text-sm text-gray-500">
      Skip for now
    </button>
  </div>
);

This enhancement provides more context and flexibility for users during the onboarding process.

Comment on lines 1 to 20
"use client";

import { useRouter, useSearchParams } from "next/navigation";
import { ColdEmailForm } from "@/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings";

export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker() {
const router = useRouter();
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
const step = parseInt(searchParams.get("step") || "1");

return (
<div>
<ColdEmailForm
onSuccess={() => {
router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
}}
/>
</div>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider further enhancements based on previous feedback.

The current implementation has made progress since the last review, but there's still room for improvement. Consider incorporating more elements from the previous suggestions:

  1. Add options for customizing the blocker's behavior.
  2. Implement a visual guide or steps on how the blocker works.
  3. Show the current state of the blocker (enabled/disabled).

These additions would create a more comprehensive onboarding experience for the Cold Email Blocker feature.

Would you like assistance in implementing these enhancements?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 9-9: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

Comment on lines 54 to 62
<Link
href={
env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED
? "/welcome-upgrade"
: appHomePath
}
>
Continue
</Link>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider extracting the conditional link logic

The conditional link in the last step uses an inline ternary operator based on an environment variable. To improve readability and maintainability, consider extracting this logic into a separate function or constant.

Here's a suggested refactoring:

const getOnboardingCompletionLink = () => 
  env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED ? "/welcome-upgrade" : appHomePath;

// Then in your JSX:
<Link href={getOnboardingCompletionLink()}>
  Continue
</Link>

This change would make the code more readable and easier to modify in the future.

</Card>
<div className="my-8">
<Steps
selectedStep={parseInt(searchParams.step || "1")}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Use Number.parseInt for better consistency

Replace parseInt with Number.parseInt for better consistency with ES2015 standards. Also, specify the radix parameter to ensure correct parsing.

Apply this diff to update the parsing:

-          selectedStep={parseInt(searchParams.step || "1")}
+          selectedStep={Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || "1", 10)}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
selectedStep={parseInt(searchParams.step || "1")}
selectedStep={Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || "1", 10)}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 26-26: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

Comment on lines 23 to 31
const router = useRouter();
const stepRefs = useRef<(HTMLLIElement | null)[]>([]);

useEffect(() => {
const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < steps.length) {
stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
}
}, [selectedStep, steps.length]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize useEffect dependencies

The useEffect hook's dependency array includes steps.length, which may cause unnecessary re-renders if the number of steps changes. Consider memoizing the steps array or extracting the length calculation outside the component if it's static.

const stepsLength = useMemo(() => steps.length, [steps]);

useEffect(() => {
  const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
  if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < stepsLength) {
    stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
  }
}, [selectedStep, stepsLength]);

This change will prevent re-running the effect when only the content of the steps changes, but not their number.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 10 to 95
export function Steps({
selectedStep,
steps,
}: {
selectedStep: number;
steps: {
title: string;
description: string;
content: React.ReactNode;
videoUrl?: string;
active: boolean;
}[];
}) {
const router = useRouter();
const stepRefs = useRef<(HTMLLIElement | null)[]>([]);

useEffect(() => {
const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < steps.length) {
stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
}
}, [selectedStep, steps.length]);

return (
<ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={stepIdx}
ref={(el) => {
if (el) stepRefs.current[stepIdx] = el;
}}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
<div
className={cn(
stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? "h-6" : "-bottom-6",
"absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
)}
>
<div className="w-px bg-gray-200" />
</div>

<div className="relative flex h-6 w-6 flex-none items-center justify-center bg-white">
<div className="h-1.5 w-1.5 rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300" />
</div>

<div
className={cn(
"flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
step.active ? "opacity-100" : "pointer-events-none opacity-20",
)}
>
<div className="flex justify-between gap-4">
<div>
<TypographyH3>{step.title}</TypographyH3>
<SectionDescription>{step.description}</SectionDescription>
</div>

<div className="flex items-center">
{step.videoUrl && (
<Button
variant="outline"
onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank")}
>
<PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
Watch video
</Button>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div className="mt-4">{step.content}</div>
</div>
</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider further optimizations and component breakdown

The Steps component is well-implemented but could benefit from some optimizations:

  1. Extract smaller components:

    • Create a Step component for individual step rendering.
    • Create a VideoButton component for the "Watch video" functionality.
  2. Use React's useCallback for memoizing the onClick handler:

const handleStepClick = useCallback((index: number) => {
  router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${index + 1}`, { scroll: false });
}, [router]);
  1. Consider using useMemo to memoize the steps array if it's being recalculated on every render:
const memoizedSteps = useMemo(() => steps.map(step => ({
  ...step,
  content: <StepContent step={step} onVideoClick={handleVideoClick} />
})), [steps, handleVideoClick]);

These optimizations can help improve the component's performance and maintainability as the onboarding flow grows more complex.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 34-34: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 37-37: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { type SubmitHandler, useForm } from "react-hook-form";
import useSWR from "swr";
import { BookOpenCheckIcon, SparklesIcon } from "lucide-react";
import { useSession } from "next-auth/react";
import { Button } from "@/components/Button";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent Button import paths detected.

Multiple files are still importing Button from the old path @/components/Button. Please update these import statements to @/components/ui/button to maintain consistency across the codebase.

Affected files:

  • apps/web/components/TopNav.tsx
  • apps/web/components/PremiumAlert.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/error.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/home/CTAButtons.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/login/LoginForm.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/login/error/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/components/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/thank-you/page.tsx
  • apps/web/components/ListHeading.tsx
  • apps/web/components/GroupHeading.tsx
  • apps/web/components/ErrorPage.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-archive/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/license/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/LabelsSection.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/MultiAccountSection.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/ModelSection.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/EmailUpdatesSection.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/stats/StatsOnboarding.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding-old2/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/DeleteSection.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/simple/SimpleList.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/ApiKeysCreateForm.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/settings/AboutSectionForm.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/request-access/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/automation/TestRules.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(app)/admin/AdminUpgradeUserForm.tsx
  • apps/web/components/Celebration.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain

Approve import path change and suggest consistency check.

The updated import path for the Button component reflects an improved organization of UI components. This change is beneficial for maintainability and clarity.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:

This will help identify any files that may still be using the old import path and confirm the usage of the new path.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old Button import statements

# Test: Search for old Button import statements
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'from\s+["'\'']@/components/Button["'\'']'

# Test: Verify new Button import statements
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'from\s+["'\'']@/components/ui/button["'\'']'

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old Button import statements by targeting .ts and .tsx files

# Search for old Button import statements
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'from\s+["'"'"']@/components/Button["'"'"']'

# Search for new Button import statements
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" 'from\s+["'"'"']@/components/ui/button["'"'"']'

Length of output: 9116

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (2)

1-20: Consider using import type for type-only imports

The imports for NewsletterStatsQuery and NewsletterStatsResponse are only used as types. To improve bundle size and clarify intent, consider using import type:

import type {
  NewsletterStatsQuery,
  NewsletterStatsResponse,
} from "@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route";

This change ensures that these imports are removed during transpilation and won't affect the runtime bundle size.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 15-19: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


36-59: Remove commented-out sample data

The overall component structure and state management look good. However, there's some commented-out sample data that should be removed if it's no longer needed. Keeping unused code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.

- // const rows = [
-   //   {
-   //     email: "[email protected]",
-   //     emails: 39,
-   //     read: 25,
-   //     archived: 10,
-   //   },
-   //   {
-   //     email: "[email protected]",
-   //     emails: 39,
-   //     read: 25,
-   //     archived: 10,
-   //   },
-   //   {
-   //     email: "[email protected]",
-   //     emails: 39,
-   //     read: 25,
-   //     archived: 10,
-   //   },
- // ];

The use of useState for managing unsubscribed emails and the custom hook for fetching newsletter stats is well-implemented.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b6fac7 and b88bf60.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 15-19: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

1-118: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with room for improvement

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-structured and implements the basic functionality required. However, there are several areas where it can be improved:

  1. Type safety: Use import type for type-only imports and improve typing in the custom hook.
  2. Error handling: Implement more robust error handling, especially for API calls and data parsing.
  3. Performance: Consider implementing pagination or virtualization for large datasets.
  4. Functionality: Implement actual unsubscribe API calls instead of just updating local state.
  5. Code cleanliness: Remove commented-out sample data.

These improvements will enhance the component's reliability, performance, and maintainability. Overall, it's a good starting point that can be iteratively improved.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 15-19: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Comment on lines 22 to 34
const useNewsletterStats = () => {
const params: NewsletterStatsQuery = {
types: [],
filters: [],
orderBy: "unarchived",
limit: 3,
includeMissingUnsubscribe: true,
};
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(params as any);
return useSWR<NewsletterStatsResponse, { error: string }>(
`/api/user/stats/newsletters?${urlParams}`,
);
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve typing in useNewsletterStats hook

The custom hook is well-structured, but there are a couple of improvements we can make:

  1. Use a more specific type for the URLSearchParams constructor instead of any.
  2. Consider adding a return type to the hook for better type inference.

Here's a suggested improvement:

const useNewsletterStats = () => {
  const params: NewsletterStatsQuery = {
    types: [],
    filters: [],
    orderBy: "unarchived",
    limit: 3,
    includeMissingUnsubscribe: true,
  };
  const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(params as Record<string, string>);
  return useSWR<NewsletterStatsResponse, { error: string }>(
    `/api/user/stats/newsletters?${urlParams}`
  );
};

This change improves type safety and makes the hook's return type explicit.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 30-30: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

Comment on lines 61 to 117
return (
<div className="relative">
<Card className="overflow-visible">
<LoadingContent loading={isLoading} error={error}>
<Table>
<TableHeader>
<TableRow>
<TableHead>Email</TableHead>
<TableHead>Emails</TableHead>
<TableHead>Read</TableHead>
<TableHead>Archived</TableHead>
<TableHead>Action</TableHead>
</TableRow>
</TableHeader>
<TableBody>
{data?.newsletters.map((row) => {
const splitIndex = row.name.split("<");
const name = splitIndex[0].trim();
const email = splitIndex[1].split(">")[0].trim();

return (
<TableRow key={row.name}>
<TableCell>
<div>{name}</div>
<div className="text-slate-500">{email}</div>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>{row.value}</TableCell>
<TableCell>{row.inboxEmails}</TableCell>
<TableCell>{row.readEmails}</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<Button
disabled={unsubscribed.includes(row.name)}
onClick={() => {
setUnsubscribed((currentUnsubscribed) => [
...currentUnsubscribed,
row.name,
]);
}}
>
{unsubscribed.includes(row.name)
? "Unsubscribed"
: "Unsubscribe"}
</Button>
</TableCell>
</TableRow>
);
})}
</TableBody>
</Table>
</LoadingContent>
</Card>

<Suspense>
<OnboardingNextButton />
</Suspense>
</div>
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance rendering logic and unsubscribe functionality

The rendering logic is well-structured, but there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Email parsing: The current method of parsing the email address is not robust. Consider using a regular expression or a dedicated email parsing library for better reliability.

  2. Unsubscribe functionality: Currently, the unsubscribe action only updates local state. Consider implementing an actual unsubscribe API call.

  3. Error handling: Add error handling for the case where data?.newsletters is undefined.

Here's a suggested improvement for the email parsing and unsubscribe functionality:

import { useState, useCallback } from 'react';

export function OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber() {
  // ... existing code ...

  const unsubscribe = useCallback(async (email: string) => {
    try {
      // Implement API call to unsubscribe
      await api.unsubscribe(email);
      setUnsubscribed((current) => [...current, email]);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Failed to unsubscribe:', error);
      // Handle error (e.g., show error message to user)
    }
  }, []);

  const parseEmail = (name: string) => {
    const match = name.match(/<(.+)>/);
    return match ? match[1] : name;
  };

  return (
    // ... existing code ...
    <TableBody>
      {data?.newsletters?.map((row) => {
        const email = parseEmail(row.name);
        const name = row.name.split('<')[0].trim();

        return (
          <TableRow key={row.name}>
            {/* ... other cells ... */}
            <TableCell>
              <Button
                disabled={unsubscribed.includes(email)}
                onClick={() => unsubscribe(email)}
              >
                {unsubscribed.includes(email) ? "Unsubscribed" : "Unsubscribe"}
              </Button>
            </TableCell>
          </TableRow>
        );
      })}
    </TableBody>
    // ... existing code ...
  );
}

These changes improve the reliability of email parsing and prepare the component for implementing actual unsubscribe functionality.


🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider performance optimizations for large datasets

The current implementation fetches and renders all newsletters at once, which could lead to performance issues with large datasets. Consider implementing the following optimizations:

  1. Pagination: Implement server-side pagination to fetch newsletters in smaller chunks.

  2. Virtualization: For client-side rendering of large lists, consider using a virtualization library like react-window or react-virtualized.

  3. Memoization: Use React.memo to prevent unnecessary re-renders of table rows.

Here's a basic example of how you might implement virtualization:

import { useVirtual } from 'react-virtual';

export function OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber() {
  // ... existing code ...

  const parentRef = React.useRef();
  const rowVirtualizer = useVirtual({
    size: data?.newsletters?.length || 0,
    parentRef,
    estimateSize: useCallback(() => 50, []),
    overscan: 5,
  });

  return (
    // ... existing code ...
    <TableBody ref={parentRef}>
      {rowVirtualizer.virtualItems.map((virtualRow) => {
        const row = data?.newsletters[virtualRow.index];
        if (!row) return null;
        // Render row content
      })}
    </TableBody>
    // ... existing code ...
  );
}

These optimizations will help ensure smooth performance even with large datasets.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
apps/web/utils/date.ts (1)

38-41: Approve addition of time constants with suggestions for improvement.

The addition of these time constants is a good practice and will be useful for various time-based calculations throughout the application. However, there are a couple of points to consider:

  1. The ONE_MONTH_MS constant uses a 30-day month, which is an approximation. Consider adding a comment to clarify this or use a more precise calculation if exact month durations are needed in your application.

  2. For very precise calculations, especially those involving ONE_YEAR_MS, you might want to account for leap years. The current calculation assumes all years have 365 days.

Consider updating the constants as follows:

export const ONE_HOUR_MS = 1000 * 60 * 60;
export const ONE_DAY_MS = ONE_HOUR_MS * 24;
// Approximate. Actual month duration varies.
export const ONE_MONTH_MS = ONE_DAY_MS * 30.44; // Average days in a month
export const ONE_YEAR_MS = ONE_DAY_MS * 365.25; // Account for leap years

This provides more precise values for month and year durations. Add comments to explain the approximations where necessary.

apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (4)

8-8: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.

The import of ONE_HOUR_MS from @/utils/date is a good practice for maintaining consistent time-related constants across the codebase.

Consider grouping this import with other utility imports for better organization. For example:

import { withError } from "@/utils/middleware";
import { sendCompleteRegistrationEvent } from "@/utils/fb";
import { posthogCaptureEvent } from "@/utils/posthog";
import prisma from "@/utils/prisma";
import { ONE_HOUR_MS } from "@/utils/date";

Line range hint 13-38: Consider adding error logging for event sending.

The POST handler is well-structured, but it might benefit from explicit error handling for the event sending promises.

Consider adding error logging for failed promises:

const results = await Promise.allSettled([fbPromise, posthogPromise]);
results.forEach((result, index) => {
  if (result.status === 'rejected') {
    console.error(`Error sending event ${index + 1}:`, result.reason);
  }
});

This will help in identifying and debugging any issues with event sending.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)


Line range hint 43-53: Consider adding IP address validation.

The getIp function handles different header scenarios well, but it doesn't validate the IP address format.

Consider adding IP address validation to ensure the returned value is always a valid IP:

import net from 'net';

function isValidIP(ip: string): boolean {
  return net.isIP(ip) !== 0;
}

function getIp() {
  const FALLBACK_IP_ADDRESS = "0.0.0.0";
  const forwardedFor = headers().get("x-forwarded-for");

  if (forwardedFor) {
    const ips = forwardedFor.split(",");
    for (const ip of ips) {
      const trimmedIp = ip.trim();
      if (isValidIP(trimmedIp)) return trimmedIp;
    }
  }

  const realIp = headers().get("x-real-ip");
  if (realIp && isValidIP(realIp)) return realIp;

  return FALLBACK_IP_ADDRESS;
}

This ensures that only valid IP addresses are returned, improving the robustness of the function.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)


Line range hint 55-85: Add error handling for posthogCaptureEvent.

The storePosthogSignupEvent function is well-structured, but it lacks error handling for the posthogCaptureEvent call.

Consider wrapping the posthogCaptureEvent call in a try-catch block:

async function storePosthogSignupEvent(userId: string, email: string) {
  // ... existing code ...

  try {
    return await posthogCaptureEvent(
      email,
      "User signed up",
      {
        $set_once: { createdAt: userCreatedAt.createdAt },
      },
      true,
    );
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(`Error capturing PostHog event for user ${userId}:`, error);
    // Optionally, you might want to rethrow the error or handle it differently
  }
}

This will ensure that any errors during the event capture are logged and don't silently fail.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (2)

1-15: LGTM: Import statements and component signature look good.

The import statements and the updated component signature are appropriate for the new onboarding flow. However, consider updating the type definition for the step parameter to make it optional, as it may be undefined in some cases.

Apply this diff to adjust the type definition:

 export default function OnboardingPage({
   searchParams,
 }: {
-  searchParams: { step: string };
+  searchParams: { step?: string };
 }) {

22-67: Improve step parsing and approve Steps component usage.

The Steps component usage and configuration look good overall. However, there are two improvements we can make:

  1. Use Number.parseInt instead of parseInt for better consistency with ES2015 standards.
  2. Provide a radix parameter to ensure correct parsing.

Apply this diff to update the parsing:

-          selectedStep={
-            searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined
-          }
+          selectedStep={
+            searchParams.step ? Number.parseInt(searchParams.step, 10) : undefined
+          }

The rest of the Steps configuration looks well-structured and provides a clear onboarding flow.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 24-24: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (2)

1-25: LGTM! Consider using a custom type for step objects.

The imports and component declaration are well-structured. The use of TypeScript for prop types enhances type safety. To improve maintainability, consider defining a custom type for the step objects:

type Step = {
  title: string;
  description: string;
  content: React.ReactNode;
  videoUrl?: string;
  active: boolean;
};

export function Steps({
  selectedStep,
  steps,
}: {
  selectedStep: number | undefined;
  steps: Step[];
}) {
  // ...
}

This change would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.


80-86: Enhance security for external video links

When opening external links, it's a good practice to add security-related attributes. Update the video button as follows:

<Button
  variant="outline"
  onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank", "noopener,noreferrer")}
>
  <PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
  Watch video
</Button>

This change adds noopener and noreferrer to prevent potential security vulnerabilities when opening links in new tabs.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (2)

40-63: Remove commented-out code

The rows array with sample data is commented out and no longer used. It's best practice to remove unused code to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

Consider removing lines 44-63 if this sample data is no longer needed.


135-137: Add fallback UI for Suspense wrapper

The OnboardingNextButton is wrapped in a Suspense component, which is good for handling asynchronous loading. However, there's no fallback UI provided. Consider adding a fallback to improve user experience:

<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
  <OnboardingNextButton />
</Suspense>

This will show a loading indicator while the OnboardingNextButton is being loaded.

apps/web/utils/actions/premium.ts (2)

276-281: LGTM: Consistent use of time constants

The use of ONE_YEAR_MS and ONE_MONTH_MS in the getRenewsAt function improves code clarity and reduces the risk of errors associated with hardcoded values. This change is consistent with the new imports and maintains the existing logic.

For even better consistency, consider using these constants for all time-related calculations throughout the file.


Line range hint 1-324: Consider further improvements for consistency and error handling

While the changes made are good, there are opportunities for further improvements:

  1. Consider using the new time constants (ONE_MONTH_MS, ONE_YEAR_MS) in other parts of the file where time calculations are performed, for consistency.

  2. The error handling in some functions (e.g., activateLicenseKeyAction, changePremiumStatusAction) could be improved by using more specific error types or error codes, which would make it easier for the client to handle different error scenarios.

  3. Some functions (e.g., updateMultiAccountPremiumAction) are quite long and complex. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability.

  4. The createPremiumForUser function is currently not exported. If it's only used within this file, consider moving it closer to where it's used for better code organization.

  5. Consider adding more detailed comments or JSDoc for complex functions to improve code documentation.

These suggestions are not directly related to the current changes but could improve the overall quality of the file.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b88bf60 and 54364ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/actions/premium.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/date.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 34-34: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 15-19: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx

[error] 35-35: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 37-52: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 38-38: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx

[error] 24-24: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/web/utils/date.ts (1)

38-41: Consider utilizing these constants throughout the codebase.

The addition of these time constants is a valuable improvement. To maximize their benefit:

  1. Review the codebase for any hard-coded time values (in milliseconds) that could be replaced with these constants.
  2. Update existing time-based calculations to use these constants where appropriate.

This will improve code readability and maintainability across the project.

To identify potential places where these constants could be used, run the following script:

This script will help identify areas where the new constants can be applied, improving consistency across the codebase.

apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-85: Overall, the file is well-structured with room for minor improvements.

The apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts file effectively handles user registration completion, including authentication checks and event sending to external services. The addition of the ONE_HOUR_MS import improves code organization.

Key points:

  1. Good use of middleware and error handling.
  2. Proper authentication checks before processing.
  3. Effective use of Promise.allSettled for parallel event sending.
  4. The getIp function handles different header scenarios well.
  5. The storePosthogSignupEvent function correctly uses the new ONE_HOUR_MS constant.

With the suggested improvements (error logging, IP validation, and error handling for PostHog event capture), this file will be more robust and maintainable.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (2)

16-22: LGTM: Main component structure is well-organized.

The component's main structure is clean and uses appropriate custom components for typography. The centered layout with a maximum width provides a good user experience for the onboarding process.


1-71: LGTM: Comprehensive onboarding implementation.

The OnboardingPage component successfully implements a multi-step onboarding process, fulfilling the PR objective of guiding new users through the application. The structure is clean, well-organized, and covers key features like bulk unsubscribing, AI personal assistant, and cold email blocking.

A few minor improvements have been suggested in previous comments, but overall, this implementation provides a solid foundation for enhancing user engagement and understanding of the app's functionalities.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 24-24: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1)

1-96: Overall: Well-implemented component with room for improvements

The Steps component is well-structured and implements a good onboarding flow. Here's a summary of the suggested improvements:

  1. Define a custom type for step objects to enhance maintainability.
  2. Optimize the useEffect dependencies to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
  3. Improve accessibility by using proper semantic elements and keyboard navigation.
  4. Extract the step rendering logic into a separate component for better code organization.
  5. Use unique keys for list items instead of array indices.
  6. Enhance security for external video links.

These changes will significantly improve the component's accessibility, performance, and maintainability. Great job on the initial implementation!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 35-35: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 37-52: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 38-38: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

65-131: LGTM: Well-structured table rendering

The table rendering logic is well-implemented. Good job on using the LoadingContent component for handling loading and error states, and the progress bars for visualizing read and archived percentages.

apps/web/utils/actions/premium.ts (1)

19-19: LGTM: Improved time constant management

The addition of ONE_MONTH_MS and ONE_YEAR_MS imports from the date utility is a good practice. This change will enhance code readability and maintainability by replacing hardcoded time values with named constants.

Comment on lines 48 to 65
{
title: "Continue",
description: "Get started with Inbox Zero",
content: (
<Button asChild>
<Link
href={
env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED
? "/welcome-upgrade"
: appHomePath
}
>
Continue
</Link>
</Button>
),
active: searchParams.step === "4",
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider extracting the conditional link logic.

To improve readability and maintainability, it's recommended to extract the conditional link logic into a separate function. This change would make the code more modular and easier to modify in the future.

Here's a suggested refactoring:

const getOnboardingCompletionLink = () => 
  env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED ? "/welcome-upgrade" : appHomePath;

// Then in your JSX:
<Button asChild>
  <Link href={getOnboardingCompletionLink()}>
    Continue
  </Link>
</Button>

This change would simplify the JSX and make the logic more reusable if needed elsewhere.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 34 to 94
return (
<ul role="list" className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={stepIdx}
ref={(el) => {
if (el) stepRefs.current[stepIdx] = el;
}}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
<div
className={cn(
stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? "h-6" : "-bottom-6",
"absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
)}
>
<div className="w-px bg-gray-200" />
</div>

<div className="relative flex h-6 w-6 flex-none items-center justify-center bg-white">
<div className="h-1.5 w-1.5 rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300" />
</div>

<div
className={cn(
"flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
step.active ? "opacity-100" : "pointer-events-none opacity-20",
)}
>
<div className="flex justify-between gap-4">
<div>
<TypographyH3>{step.title}</TypographyH3>
<SectionDescription>{step.description}</SectionDescription>
</div>

<div className="flex items-center">
{step.videoUrl && (
<Button
variant="outline"
onClick={() => window.open(step.videoUrl, "_blank")}
>
<PlayCircleIcon className="mr-2 size-4" />
Watch video
</Button>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div className="mt-4">{step.content}</div>
</div>
</li>
))}
</ul>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve accessibility and component structure

  1. Remove the redundant role="list" from the <ul> element (line 35).
  2. Replace the onClick handler on the <li> with a focusable element (e.g., a button) to improve keyboard accessibility.
  3. Use a unique identifier for the key prop instead of the array index.
  4. Extract the step rendering logic into a separate component for better maintainability.

Here's a suggested implementation:

const Step = React.memo(({ step, index, totalSteps, onStepClick, ref }) => (
  <li ref={ref} className="relative flex gap-x-4">
    {/* ... existing step content ... */}
    <button
      onClick={() => onStepClick(index)}
      onKeyDown={(e) => {
        if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
          e.preventDefault();
          onStepClick(index);
        }
      }}
      className="flex-1 text-left"
      disabled={step.active}
    >
      {/* ... step content ... */}
    </button>
  </li>
));

export function Steps({ selectedStep, steps }: StepsProps) {
  // ... existing code ...

  const handleStepClick = useCallback((index: number) => {
    if (!steps[index].active) {
      router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${index + 1}`, { scroll: false });
    }
  }, [router, steps]);

  return (
    <ul className="space-y-6">
      {steps.map((step, index) => (
        <Step
          key={step.title} // Assuming title is unique
          step={step}
          index={index}
          totalSteps={steps.length}
          onStepClick={handleStepClick}
          ref={(el) => {
            if (el) stepRefs.current[index] = el;
          }}
        />
      ))}
    </ul>
  );
}

These changes will improve accessibility, performance, and maintainability of the component.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 35-35: Using the role attribute 'list' on the 'ul' element is redundant, because it is implied by the semantic 'ul' element.

Unsafe fix: Remove the role attribute.

(lint/a11y/noRedundantRoles)


[error] 37-52: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)


[error] 38-38: Avoid using the index of an array as key property in an element.

This is the source of the key value.

The order of the items may change, and this also affects performances and component state.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/suspicious/noArrayIndexKey)

Comment on lines 3 to 23
import useSWR from "swr";
import { Suspense, useMemo, useState } from "react";
import { OnboardingNextButton } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
import { Card } from "@/components/ui/card";
import {
Table,
TableBody,
TableCell,
TableHead,
TableHeader,
TableRow,
} from "@/components/ui/table";
import {
NewsletterStatsQuery,
NewsletterStatsResponse,
} from "@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route";
import { LoadingContent } from "@/components/LoadingContent";
import { ProgressBar } from "@tremor/react";
import { ONE_MONTH_MS } from "@/utils/date";

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve type safety and import statements

  1. In the useNewsletterStats hook, replace the any type with a more specific type:
const urlParams = new URLSearchParams(params as Record<string, string>);
  1. For type-only imports, use the import type syntax:
import type {
  NewsletterStatsQuery,
  NewsletterStatsResponse,
} from "@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route";

These changes will enhance type safety and optimize the import statements.

Also applies to: 24-38

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 15-19: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Comment on lines 80 to 129
{data?.newsletters.map((row) => {
const splitIndex = row.name.split("<");
const name = splitIndex[0].trim();
const email = splitIndex[1].split(">")[0].trim();

const readPercentage = (row.readEmails / row.value) * 100;
const archivedEmails = row.value - row.inboxEmails;
const archivedPercentage = (archivedEmails / row.value) * 100;

return (
<TableRow key={row.name}>
<TableCell>
<div>{name}</div>
<div className="text-slate-500">{email}</div>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>{row.value}</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<ProgressBar
value={readPercentage}
label={`${Math.round(readPercentage)}%`}
color="blue"
className="w-[150px]"
/>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<ProgressBar
value={archivedPercentage}
label={`${Math.round(archivedPercentage)}%`}
color="blue"
className="w-[150px]"
/>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<Button
disabled={unsubscribed.includes(row.name)}
onClick={() => {
setUnsubscribed((currentUnsubscribed) => [
...currentUnsubscribed,
row.name,
]);
}}
>
{unsubscribed.includes(row.name)
? "Unsubscribed"
: "Unsubscribe"}
</Button>
</TableCell>
</TableRow>
);
})}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve email parsing and unsubscribe functionality

  1. Email parsing:
    The current method of parsing the email address is not robust. Consider using a regular expression for better reliability:
const parseEmail = (name: string) => {
  const match = name.match(/<(.+)>/);
  return match ? match[1] : name;
};

// Usage
const email = parseEmail(row.name);
const name = row.name.split('<')[0].trim();
  1. Unsubscribe functionality:
    Currently, the unsubscribe action only updates local state. Consider implementing an actual unsubscribe API call:
const unsubscribe = async (email: string) => {
  try {
    await api.unsubscribe(email);
    setUnsubscribed((current) => [...current, email]);
  } catch (error) {
    console.error('Failed to unsubscribe:', error);
    // Handle error (e.g., show error message to user)
  }
};

// Usage in onClick
onClick={() => unsubscribe(email)}

These changes will improve the reliability of email parsing and prepare the component for implementing actual unsubscribe functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

43-76: Well-structured component with room for enhanced error handling

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-structured and effectively uses custom hooks and components for data fetching and rendering. The use of LoadingContent for handling loading and error states is a good practice.

Consider enhancing the error handling by providing more specific error messages or recovery options to the user when data fetching fails. This could improve the user experience in case of network issues or other errors.

apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/BulkUnsubscribeMobile.tsx (1)

122-126: Improved unsubscribe button implementation

The changes to the unsubscribe button and link improve both functionality and user experience:

  1. Setting asChild={true} on the Button component ensures proper wrapping of the Link.
  2. Using unsubscribeLink directly in the href attribute keeps the link up-to-date.
  3. The conditional target attribute is a good practice for handling external links.

These modifications enhance the robustness and usability of the unsubscribe feature.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the "#" check in the target attribute, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers why this condition exists.

apps/web/app/(app)/simple/SimpleList.tsx (2)

169-172: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for clarity.

The modification to conditionally set the target attribute of the unsubscribe link is a good improvement. It prevents opening a new tab for placeholder links (when unsubscribeLink === "#"), which enhances the user experience.

To further improve code clarity, consider extracting the condition into a descriptive variable:

const isExternalLink = unsubscribeLink !== "#";

<Link
  href={unsubscribeLink}
  target={isExternalLink ? "_blank" : undefined}
>
  {/* ... */}
</Link>

This change would make the code's intent more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.


Line range hint 1-359: Consider additional improvements for email management functionality.

While the current change improves the unsubscribe link behavior, there are potential areas for further enhancement in the file:

  1. Error Handling: Consider adding error handling for actions like unsubscribing, marking as spam, or archiving emails. This could improve the user experience by providing feedback when actions fail.

  2. Accessibility: Ensure that all interactive elements (buttons, links) have proper aria labels for screen readers. This is particularly important for icon-only buttons.

  3. Performance: For large email lists, consider implementing virtualization to improve rendering performance.

  4. Testing: Given the complexity of the email management logic, it would be beneficial to add unit tests for critical functions and components.

  5. TODO Comments: Address the TODO comments in the file, particularly the one about showing only one of two buttons for marking emails as important/unimportant.

These suggestions aim to enhance the overall quality and maintainability of the email management functionality.

apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/common.tsx (1)

Line range hint 161-183: LGTM! Improved unsubscribe link handling.

The changes to the UnsubscribeButton component enhance the handling of unsubscribe links:

  1. Using unsubscribeLink from the useUnsubscribe hook centralizes the logic for determining the unsubscribe URL.
  2. The conditional target attribute improves user experience by opening external links in a new tab.

These modifications make the code more maintainable and user-friendly.

Consider adding a rel="noopener noreferrer" attribute to the Link component when opening in a new tab for enhanced security:

 <Link
   href={unsubscribeLink}
-  target={unsubscribeLink !== "#" ? "_blank" : undefined}
+  target={unsubscribeLink !== "#" ? "_blank" : undefined}
+  rel={unsubscribeLink !== "#" ? "noopener noreferrer" : undefined}
   onClick={onUnsubscribe}
-  rel="noreferrer"
 >
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 160-160: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks.ts (3)

Line range hint 287-350: Abstract Duplicate Logic to Improve Maintainability.

There's a TODO comment indicating that similar logic exists elsewhere in the file. To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle and enhance maintainability, consider extracting the duplicated code into a reusable function or custom hook.

Apply this refactor to abstract the duplicated logic:

+// Extract common logic into a separate function
+function handleItemAction(params) {
+  // ...common logic...
+}

export function useBulkUnsubscribeShortcuts<T extends Row>({
  // ...props...
}) {
  // perform actions using keyboard shortcuts
  // TODO make this available to command-K dialog too
- // TODO limit the copy-paste. same logic appears twice in this file
+ // The common logic has been abstracted into `handleItemAction`

  React.useEffect(() => {
    // ...use `handleItemAction` where appropriate...
  }, [
    // ...dependencies...
  ]);
}

Line range hint 287-350: Avoid Using async Functions Directly in Event Listeners.

The down event handler is an async function passed directly to addEventListener. This can lead to unhandled promise rejections because the event listener does not handle the promise returned by an async function. It is recommended to avoid using async functions directly in event listeners.

Apply this diff to refactor the code:

-        const down = async (e: KeyboardEvent) => {
+        const down = (e: KeyboardEvent) => {
           const item = selectedRow;
           if (!item) return;
           // ...rest of the code...

           if (e.key === "e") {
             e.preventDefault();
-            onAutoArchive(item.name);
-            await setNewsletterStatusAction({
-              newsletterEmail: item.name,
-              status: NewsletterStatus.AUTO_ARCHIVED,
-            });
-            await mutate();
-            await decrementUnsubscribeCreditAction();
-            await refetchPremium();
+            handleAutoArchive(item);
             return;
           }
           // ...other key handlers...
         };

+        const handleAutoArchive = async (item: T) => {
+          await onAutoArchive(item.name);
+          await setNewsletterStatusAction({
+            newsletterEmail: item.name,
+            status: NewsletterStatus.AUTO_ARCHIVED,
+          });
+          await mutate();
+          await decrementUnsubscribeCreditAction();
+          await refetchPremium();
+        };

Line range hint 287-350: Include All Dependencies in useEffect Dependency Array.

In the useEffect hook, some external dependencies like onAutoArchive and decrementUnsubscribeCreditAction are used but not included in the dependency array. This might lead to stale closures or unintended behavior.

Ensure all external dependencies are included:

   }, [
     mutate,
     newsletters,
     selectedRow,
     hasUnsubscribeAccess,
     refetchPremium,
     setSelectedRow,
     onOpenNewsletter,
+    onAutoArchive,
+    decrementUnsubscribeCreditAction,
   ]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54364ca and 4eac9df.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/BulkUnsubscribeMobile.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/common.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/simple/SimpleList.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 37-37: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/BulkUnsubscribeMobile.tsx (1)

61-69: Improved unsubscribe link handling

The addition of unsubscribeLink to the useUnsubscribe hook's return value is a positive change. This modification allows for more dynamic and flexible handling of unsubscribe URLs, potentially improving the user experience and the overall robustness of the unsubscribe functionality.

apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks.ts (1)

Line range hint 287-350: Prevent Memory Leaks by Cleaning Up Event Listeners Properly.

Confirm that the event listener added in the useEffect hook is properly cleaned up to prevent memory leaks. The cleanup function seems correctly implemented, but verify that it always gets called when the component unmounts.

You can verify that the cleanup function works by ensuring that document.removeEventListener is called with the same event handler reference.

Comment on lines 1 to 25
"use client";

import useSWR from "swr";
import Link from "next/link";
import { usePostHog, PostHog } from "posthog-js/react";
import { Suspense, useMemo, useState } from "react";
import { OnboardingNextButton } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton";
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button";
import { Card } from "@/components/ui/card";
import {
Table,
TableBody,
TableCell,
TableHead,
TableHeader,
TableRow,
} from "@/components/ui/table";
import {
NewsletterStatsQuery,
NewsletterStatsResponse,
} from "@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route";
import { LoadingContent } from "@/components/LoadingContent";
import { ProgressBar } from "@tremor/react";
import { ONE_MONTH_MS } from "@/utils/date";
import { useUnsubscribe } from "@/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize imports using import type for type-only imports

To improve bundle size and compilation speed, consider using import type for imports that are only used as types. This applies to the following imports:

  • Link from 'next/link'
  • NewsletterStatsQuery and NewsletterStatsResponse from '@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route'

Example:

import type Link from "next/link";
import type {
  NewsletterStatsQuery,
  NewsletterStatsResponse,
} from "@/app/api/user/stats/newsletters/route";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Comment on lines 78 to 144
function UnsubscribeRow({
row,
posthog,
}: {
row: NewsletterStatsResponse["newsletters"][number];
posthog: PostHog;
}) {
const [unsubscribed, setUnsubscribed] = useState(false);
const { unsubscribeLoading, onUnsubscribe, unsubscribeLink } = useUnsubscribe(
{
item: row,
hasUnsubscribeAccess: true,
mutate: () => Promise.resolve(),
refetchPremium: () => Promise.resolve(),
posthog,
},
);

const splitIndex = row.name.split("<");
const name = splitIndex[0].trim();
const email = splitIndex[1].split(">")[0].trim();

const readPercentage = (row.readEmails / row.value) * 100;
const archivedEmails = row.value - row.inboxEmails;
const archivedPercentage = (archivedEmails / row.value) * 100;

return (
<TableRow key={row.name}>
<TableCell>
<div>{name}</div>
<div className="text-slate-500">{email}</div>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>{row.value}</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<ProgressBar
value={readPercentage}
label={`${Math.round(readPercentage)}%`}
color="blue"
className="w-[150px]"
/>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<ProgressBar
value={archivedPercentage}
label={`${Math.round(archivedPercentage)}%`}
color="blue"
className="w-[150px]"
/>
</TableCell>
<TableCell>
<Button disabled={unsubscribed} loading={unsubscribeLoading} asChild>
<Link
href={unsubscribeLink}
target={unsubscribeLink !== "#" ? "_blank" : undefined}
rel="noreferrer"
onClick={() => {
onUnsubscribe();
setUnsubscribed(true);
}}
>
{unsubscribed ? "Unsubscribed" : "Unsubscribe"}
</Link>
</Button>
</TableCell>
</TableRow>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance email parsing and unsubscribe functionality

The UnsubscribeRow component is well-implemented, but there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Email parsing: Consider using a more robust method to parse the email address, such as a regular expression. This will handle edge cases better:
const parseEmail = (name: string) => {
  const match = name.match(/<(.+)>/);
  return match ? match[1] : name;
};
  1. Unsubscribe feedback: Implement a feedback mechanism for failed unsubscribe attempts. This could be done by adding an error state and displaying an error message to the user if the unsubscribe action fails.

  2. Button interaction: Consider using a Button component directly instead of wrapping a Link with a Button. If navigation is necessary, handle it programmatically after the unsubscribe action is complete.

<Button 
  disabled={unsubscribed} 
  loading={unsubscribeLoading}
  onClick={async () => {
    try {
      await onUnsubscribe();
      setUnsubscribed(true);
      // Navigate if necessary
    } catch (error) {
      // Handle error
    }
  }}
>
  {unsubscribed ? "Unsubscribed" : "Unsubscribe"}
</Button>

These changes will improve the robustness and user experience of the unsubscribe functionality.

apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/web/__tests__/ai-example-matches.test.ts (4)

13-28: LGTM! Consider extracting the rules prompt for better readability

The test setup looks good. The increased timeout, user data setup, and rules prompt are well-defined. To improve readability, consider extracting the rules prompt into a separate constant.

Here's a suggested improvement:

const RULES_PROMPT = `
* Label newsletters as "Newsletter" and archive them.
* Label emails that require a reply as "Reply Required".
* If a customer asks to set up a call, send them my calendar link: https://cal.com/example
`.trim();

// Then use RULES_PROMPT in the test case

This change will make the test case more concise and easier to maintain if the rules need to be updated in the future.


30-63: LGTM! Consider using consistent naming for email addresses

The mock messages are well-structured and cover different scenarios that align with the defined rules. This is excellent for comprehensive testing.

For improved consistency and readability, consider using a common domain for all mock email addresses. For example:

const mockMessages = [
  {
    // ... other properties
    headers: {
      from: "[email protected]",
      // ... other headers
    },
  },
  {
    // ... other properties
    headers: {
      from: "[email protected]",
      // ... other headers
    },
  },
  {
    // ... other properties
    headers: {
      from: "[email protected]",
      // ... other headers
    },
  },
];

This change makes the test data more uniform and easier to understand at a glance.


65-93: LGTM! Consider adding more specific assertions for robustness

The test expectations are well-structured and cover important aspects of the result. The use of expect.objectContaining and expect.arrayContaining provides good flexibility in the assertions.

To make the test even more robust, consider adding more specific assertions for each mock message. For example:

expect(result.matches).toEqual(
  expect.arrayContaining([
    expect.objectContaining({
      emailId: mockMessages[0].id,
      rule: expect.stringContaining("Newsletter"),
    }),
    expect.objectContaining({
      emailId: mockMessages[1].id,
      rule: expect.stringContaining("Reply Required"),
    }),
    expect.objectContaining({
      emailId: mockMessages[2].id,
      rule: expect.stringContaining("calendar link"),
    }),
  ])
);

This change will ensure that each mock message is correctly matched with its corresponding rule, providing a more thorough test of the aiFindExampleMatches function's behavior.


93-101: LGTM! Consider adding a specific expectation for maxResults

The expectation for the queryBatchMessages function call is well-structured and provides good flexibility with expect.anything() for some arguments.

To improve clarity and make the test more specific, consider adding an exact expectation for the maxResults parameter if its value is known and consistent. For example:

expect(queryBatchMessages).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
  expect.anything(),
  expect.anything(),
  expect.objectContaining({
    maxResults: 10, // Or whatever the expected value is
  }),
);

If the exact value is not known or may vary, you could add a comment explaining why expect.any(Number) is used instead of a specific value. This will make the test's intentions clearer to other developers who may work on this code in the future.

apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts (1)

49-49: Use a structured logging library instead of console.log for better log management

While console.log is helpful during development, it's better to use a dedicated logging library for improved log handling and configurability, especially in production environments.

Consider replacing console.log with a proper logging mechanism if available.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eac9df and 928cf7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/tests/ai-example-matches.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/__tests__/ai-example-matches.test.ts

[error] 1-2: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts

[error] 51-51: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.

Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal

(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/__tests__/ai-example-matches.test.ts (1)

1-101: Overall, excellent test implementation with room for minor enhancements

This test file for the aiFindExampleMatches function is well-structured, comprehensive, and effectively covers various scenarios. The use of mock data, clear expectations, and thorough assertions contributes to a robust test case.

Key strengths:

  1. Realistic mock data aligned with the rules prompt
  2. Comprehensive assertions covering match content, count, and schema validation
  3. Proper use of mocking for external dependencies

The suggested improvements, if implemented, will further enhance the readability, consistency, and robustness of the test. Great job on creating a thorough and effective test case!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 1-2: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/__tests__/ai-example-matches.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 26 to 40
execute: async ({ query }: { query: string | undefined }) => {
const { messages } = await queryBatchMessages(gmail, accessToken, {
query,
maxResults: 20,
});

const results = messages.map((message) => ({
emailId: message.id,
from: message.headers.from,
subject: message.headers.subject,
snippet: message.snippet,
}));

return results;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for API calls to handle potential failures

In the execute function of listEmailsTool, consider adding error handling for the queryBatchMessages call. This ensures that any exceptions are caught and appropriate action is taken, improving the robustness of the function.

Consider wrapping the API call in a try-catch block and handling errors accordingly.

Comment on lines +68 to +82
const aiResponse = await chatCompletionTools({
userAi: user,
system,
prompt,
maxSteps: 10,
tools: {
listEmails: listEmailsTool(gmail, accessToken),
[FIND_EXAMPLE_MATCHES]: {
description: "Find example matches",
parameters: findExampleMatchesSchema,
},
},
userEmail: user.email || "",
label: "Find example matches",
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement error handling for AI service calls to enhance reliability

When calling chatCompletionTools, consider adding error handling to manage potential exceptions from the AI service, such as network issues or service errors. This will improve the stability of your application.

Wrap the call to chatCompletionTools in a try-catch block to handle errors gracefully.

): Promise<z.infer<typeof findExampleMatchesSchema>> {
console.log(`findExampleMatches. rulesPrompt: ${rulesPrompt}`);

const system = `You are an AI assistant specializing in email management and organization. Your task is to find example emails that match the given rules.`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Replace template literal with string literal when no interpolation is needed

Line 51 uses a template literal without any variable interpolation or special-character handling. A regular string literal is more appropriate.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-   const system = `You are an AI assistant specializing in email management and organization. Your task is to find example emails that match the given rules.`;
+   const system = "You are an AI assistant specializing in email management and organization. Your task is to find example emails that match the given rules.";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const system = `You are an AI assistant specializing in email management and organization. Your task is to find example emails that match the given rules.`;
const system = "You are an AI assistant specializing in email management and organization. Your task is to find example emails that match the given rules.";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 51-51: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.

Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal

(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)

import type { gmail_v1 } from "@googleapis/gmail";
import { chatCompletionTools } from "@/utils/llms";
import type { User } from "@prisma/client";
import { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Use 'import type' for type-only imports to optimize code

The import of UserAIFields is used only for type annotations. Using import type ensures it's removed during transpilation, avoiding unnecessary module loading.

Apply this diff to fix the import:

- import { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
+ import type { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
import type { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241020163727_app_onboarding/migration.sql (1)

6-11: LGTM: Data migration logic is sound, with a minor consideration

The UPDATE statement effectively migrates existing data to the new "completedOnboardingAt" column. The logic for setting the value based on the "completedOnboarding" flag is appropriate.

Consider if using "createdAt" as the completion time for users who have already completed onboarding is the most accurate approach. If a more precise completion time is available or can be estimated, it might be worth using that instead. However, if this is not feasible or if "createdAt" is deemed sufficiently accurate for existing users, the current implementation is acceptable.

apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx (1)

39-39: Consider refining the condition based on the new property type.

The update from user.completedOnboarding to user.completedOnboardingAt is consistent with the earlier change. However, if completedOnboardingAt is now a timestamp instead of a boolean, you might want to refine this condition.

Consider updating the condition to explicitly check for a non-null timestamp:

-if (!searchParams.force && user.completedOnboardingAt) redirect(appHomePath);
+if (!searchParams.force && user.completedOnboardingAt !== null) redirect(appHomePath);

This change would make the intention clearer and prevent potential issues if completedOnboardingAt could be set to a falsy value like 0 or an empty string.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a006805 and e906818.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingFinish.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/form.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241020163727_app_onboarding/migration.sql (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/prisma/schema.prisma (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx

[error] 21-21: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241020163727_app_onboarding/migration.sql (2)

1-4: LGTM: Appropriate schema changes for onboarding tracking

The addition of "completedAppOnboardingAt" and "completedOnboardingAt" columns to the "User" table is well-aligned with the PR objective of implementing an onboarding flow. The use of TIMESTAMP(3) for millisecond precision and allowing NULL values are appropriate design choices.


1-11: LGTM: Well-structured migration script for onboarding tracking

This migration script effectively implements the necessary changes for tracking user onboarding completion. It adds appropriate columns to the "User" table and includes logic for migrating existing data. The script is idempotent and follows best practices for database migrations.

To ensure the migration doesn't affect any existing functionality, please run the following verification script:

This script will help ensure that the new columns are being used correctly and that the deprecated completedOnboarding field is not introduced in new code.

✅ Verification successful

: Migration script correctly implemented and verified.

The migration script successfully adds the new columns completedAppOnboardingAt and completedOnboardingAt to the "User" table. All existing references to the deprecated completedOnboarding field have been updated to use the new columns across the codebase. Additionally, there are no pending TODOs related to the onboarding migration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new columns are used correctly in the codebase

# Test 1: Check for usage of new columns in queries
echo "Checking for usage of new columns in queries:"
rg -i 'completedAppOnboardingAt|completedOnboardingAt' --type ts

# Test 2: Verify that completedOnboarding is not used in new code
echo "Verifying that completedOnboarding is not used in new code:"
git diff origin/main..HEAD | rg 'completedOnboarding'

# Test 3: Check for any TODOs related to onboarding migration
echo "Checking for TODOs related to onboarding migration:"
rg -i 'TODO.*onboarding' --type ts

Length of output: 2232

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingFinish.tsx (3)

1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and necessary.

The imports are logically structured, with third-party imports followed by local imports. All imported items appear to be necessary for the component's functionality.


9-23: LGTM: Component structure follows best practices.

The OnboardingFinish component is well-structured:

  • It uses a functional component with arrow function syntax.
  • The Button-Link nesting pattern (with asChild prop) is correct, ensuring proper styling and accessibility.
  • The component's simplicity aligns well with its single responsibility of providing a navigation button.

1-24: Overall, good implementation with room for minor improvements.

The OnboardingFinish component is well-structured and serves its purpose of concluding the onboarding process. It effectively uses the app's UI components and handles conditional routing based on environment variables.

To further enhance this component, consider:

  1. Implementing error handling for the completedAppOnboardingAction() call.
  2. Adding visual feedback for the user during the action processing.

These improvements will make the component more robust and provide a better user experience.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (3)

5-5: Fix import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The import statement for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant still has an inconsistent file path.

Apply this diff to fix the import path:

-import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
+import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";

8-12: Update type definition for optional step parameter

The searchParams.step is used in conditions where it might be undefined, but the type definition still specifies step as always being a string.

Apply this diff to adjust the type definition:

 export default function OnboardingPage({
   searchParams,
 }: {
-  searchParams: { step: string };
+  searchParams: { step?: string };
 }) {

1-54: Overall assessment of the OnboardingPage component

The new structure of the OnboardingPage component looks good and provides a clear flow for the onboarding process. Here's a summary of the main points for improvement:

  1. Fix the import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant.
  2. Update the type definition for the step parameter to be optional.
  3. Improve the parsing and validation of the step parameter.
  4. Simplify the active property logic in the Steps configuration.

Implementing these changes will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the component. Great job on the overall restructuring of the onboarding process!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 21-21: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx (1)

68-69: Clarify the intentionality of unconditional SignUpEvent rendering.

The commented-out condition has been updated to use completedOnboardingAt, which is consistent with previous changes. However, the SignUpEvent component is now being rendered unconditionally. This is a significant change in behavior that wasn't mentioned in the PR description or summary.

Could you please clarify if this change is intentional? If so, what's the reasoning behind always showing the SignUpEvent?

If this was unintentional, consider reverting to the conditional rendering:

-{/* {!user.completedOnboardingAt && <SignUpEvent />} */}
-<SignUpEvent />
+{!user.completedOnboardingAt && <SignUpEvent />}

Comment on lines 11 to 22
<Button asChild>
<Link
onClick={() => completedAppOnboardingAction()}
href={
env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED
? "/welcome-upgrade"
: appHomePath
}
>
Continue
</Link>
</Button>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding error handling and user feedback.

The component's core functionality looks good, but there are a couple of areas for potential improvement:

  1. Error Handling: The completedAppOnboardingAction() call doesn't have any error handling. If this action fails, the user might be navigated away without the onboarding being properly completed.

  2. User Feedback: There's no visual indication to the user that the action is being processed when they click the button.

Consider implementing the following improvements:

  1. Wrap the action call in a try-catch block and handle any potential errors.
  2. Add a loading state to the button to provide visual feedback to the user.

Here's a suggested implementation:

import { useState } from 'react';

export const OnboardingFinish = () => {
  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);

  const handleClick = async () => {
    setIsLoading(true);
    try {
      await completedAppOnboardingAction();
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Failed to complete onboarding:', error);
      // Handle error (e.g., show an error message to the user)
    } finally {
      setIsLoading(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <Button asChild disabled={isLoading}>
      <Link
        onClick={handleClick}
        href={
          env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WELCOME_UPGRADE_ENABLED
            ? "/welcome-upgrade"
            : appHomePath
        }
      >
        {isLoading ? 'Processing...' : 'Continue'}
      </Link>
    </Button>
  );
};

This implementation adds error handling and provides visual feedback to the user during the action processing.

apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/form.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +57 to +59
completedOnboarding Boolean @default(false) // deprecated
completedOnboardingAt DateTime? // questions about the user. e.g. their role
completedAppOnboardingAt DateTime? // how to use the app
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Incomplete Deprecation of completedOnboarding Field

The deprecated completedOnboarding field is still being utilized in the codebase:

  • apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/form.tsx
  • apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts

Recommendations:

  1. Remove Deprecated Field Usages:

    • Refactor the above files to eliminate references to completedOnboarding and ensure they exclusively use completedOnboardingAt and completedAppOnboardingAt.
  2. Migration Script for Removal:

    • Implement a migration script to remove the completedOnboarding field from the database to maintain schema consistency.
  3. Update Documentation:

    • Ensure all relevant documentation reflects the removal of the deprecated field and the introduction of the new fields.

Addressing these points will complete the deprecation process and align the codebase with the updated onboarding tracking strategy.

🔗 Analysis chain

Enhance onboarding tracking with new fields

The changes to the User model improve the tracking of onboarding completion:

  1. The completedOnboarding boolean field is now deprecated, indicating a shift in onboarding tracking.
  2. Two new nullable DateTime fields, completedOnboardingAt and completedAppOnboardingAt, have been added. These provide more detailed information about when specific onboarding steps were completed.

These changes align well with the PR objective of implementing an onboarding flow. However, consider the following:

  1. Ensure that the application logic is updated to use these new fields instead of the deprecated completedOnboarding.
  2. A data migration strategy may be needed to handle existing users and populate the new fields based on the old completedOnboarding value.
  3. Update any queries or filters that relied on the completedOnboarding field to use the new DateTime fields.
  4. Consider adding comments to explain the difference between completedOnboardingAt and completedAppOnboardingAt for future developers.

To ensure these changes are properly implemented throughout the codebase, run the following script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new onboarding fields and identify any remaining uses of the deprecated field.

# Test 1: Check for remaining uses of the deprecated completedOnboarding field
echo "Checking for uses of deprecated completedOnboarding field:"
rg "completedOnboarding" --type ts --type tsx

# Test 2: Check for uses of the new completedOnboardingAt field
echo "\nChecking for uses of new completedOnboardingAt field:"
rg "completedOnboardingAt" --type ts --type tsx

# Test 3: Check for uses of the new completedAppOnboardingAt field
echo "\nChecking for uses of new completedAppOnboardingAt field:"
rg "completedAppOnboardingAt" --type ts --type tsx

# Test 4: Look for potential migration files
echo "\nChecking for potential migration files:"
fd "migration" --type f

Length of output: 3755


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new onboarding fields and identify any remaining uses of the deprecated field.
# Updated to fix rg file type recognition issues.

# Test 1: Check for remaining uses of the deprecated completedOnboarding field
echo "Checking for uses of deprecated completedOnboarding field:"
rg "completedOnboarding" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# Test 2: Check for uses of the new completedOnboardingAt field
echo "\nChecking for uses of new completedOnboardingAt field:"
rg "completedOnboardingAt" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# Test 3: Check for uses of the new completedAppOnboardingAt field
echo "\nChecking for uses of new completedAppOnboardingAt field:"
rg "completedAppOnboardingAt" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# Test 4: Look specifically for migration files related to onboarding changes
echo "\nChecking for onboarding-related migration files:"
rg "onboarding" -g "migration.sql" apps/web/prisma/migrations/

Length of output: 2403

apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 19

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e906818 and e1e1387.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingFinish.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/components/page.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/ui/tabs.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingFinish.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx

[error] 125-125: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 20-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx

[error] 27-27: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts

[error] 29-29: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.

Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal

(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)


[error] 71-73: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 104-104: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)

🔇 Additional comments (14)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (5)

1-14: LGTM: Import statements and component declaration

The import statements and component declaration look good. The renaming of the component to OnboardingPage and the addition of the searchParams prop align well with the new structure of the onboarding process.


16-23: LGTM: Improved onboarding structure and layout

The new structure using the Steps component provides a clear and organized flow for the onboarding process. The layout is clean and focused on guiding the user through each step. This improvement should enhance the user experience during onboarding.

Also applies to: 24-25, 58-60


30-57: LGTM: Well-structured step configurations

The configuration for each onboarding step is well-structured and informative. The use of separate components for each step's content promotes modularity and maintainability. The inclusion of video IDs for some steps suggests the availability of video tutorials, which is a great addition to enhance the onboarding experience.


1-61: Great job on restructuring the onboarding process

The restructuring of the OnboardingPage component has significantly improved its functionality and user experience. The use of the Steps component provides clear and intuitive navigation through the onboarding process, handling different tasks in a modular and extensible way.

Key improvements:

  1. Clear step-by-step guidance for users
  2. Modular structure with separate components for each step
  3. Inclusion of video tutorials for some steps
  4. Improved layout and organization of content

These changes should greatly enhance the onboarding experience for new users. Great work on this refactoring!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 27-27: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)


5-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The import statement for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant has an inconsistent file path. It should be updated to match the component name.

Apply this diff to fix the import path:

-import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
+import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (3)

44-82: LGTM: OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-implemented

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-structured and implements proper error handling and loading states. It effectively uses the useNewsletterStats hook for data fetching and renders the newsletter data in a table format. The use of the LoadingContent component for managing loading and error states is a good practice.


1-158: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor improvements needed

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component and its subcomponents are generally well-implemented, providing a good user experience for bulk unsubscribing from newsletters during the onboarding process. The code structure is clean, and proper error handling and loading states are in place.

However, there are a few areas that could be improved:

  1. Use of import type for type-only imports to optimize bundle size and compilation speed.
  2. Replacing any type with a more specific type in the URLSearchParams constructor for better type safety.
  3. Preventing potential division by zero errors in percentage calculations.
  4. Improving the robustness of email parsing.
  5. Ensuring proper data refresh after unsubscribe actions by using the parent mutate function.
  6. Considering a more appropriate approach for handling unsubscribe actions using a Button component directly.

Addressing these points will enhance the overall quality, type safety, and robustness of the component.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


107-109: ⚠️ Potential issue

Prevent division by zero in percentage calculations

The calculations of readPercentage and archivedPercentage could lead to a division by zero error when row.value is zero. This would result in a runtime error.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-const readPercentage = (row.readEmails / row.value) * 100;
+const readPercentage = row.value > 0 ? (row.readEmails / row.value) * 100 : 0;
 const archivedEmails = row.value - row.inboxEmails;
-const archivedPercentage = (archivedEmails / row.value) * 100;
+const archivedPercentage = row.value > 0 ? (archivedEmails / row.value) * 100 : 0;

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(landing)/components/page.tsx (3)

12-12: LGTM: Import of TypographyH4 is correctly added.

The import of TypographyH4 is properly placed within the existing import statement for typography components. This maintains consistency with the current code structure.


35-35: LGTM: TypographyH4 component is appropriately added.

The <TypographyH4> component is correctly placed within the Typography demonstration section, maintaining a logical hierarchy of heading levels. This addition enhances the showcase of available UI components, which aligns well with the PR objective of improving the onboarding flow by demonstrating the app's capabilities to new users.


Line range hint 1-158: Summary: Changes enhance component demonstration for onboarding.

The additions of TypographyH4 import and component usage in this file are minor but valuable. They contribute to a more comprehensive demonstration of UI components, which aligns with the PR objective of improving the onboarding flow. The changes are well-integrated and maintain consistency with the existing code structure.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (3)

33-42: LGTM: OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component is well-structured and correctly implements the conditional rendering of the OnboardingNextButton based on the state. The use of useState for managing the visibility of the next button is appropriate.


119-180: LGTM: EmailAssistantTestResults component structure

The EmailAssistantTestResults component is well-structured and effectively handles loading, error, and data states. The use of LoadingContent for managing these states is a good practice, and the table rendering for email matches is clear and organized.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 125-125: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


1-180: Summary: Solid foundation with room for improvements

Overall, the OnboardingEmailAssistant component provides a good foundation for the email rule creation process. The main areas for improvement are:

  1. Implementing the commented-out error handling for form submission.
  2. Switching to a POST request for sending prompt data to avoid potential URL length issues.
  3. Using a dedicated Textarea component for better accessibility.
  4. Specifying a more precise type for the error prop in EmailAssistantTestResults.
  5. Optimizing imports for better tree-shaking.

Addressing these points will enhance the component's robustness, performance, and maintainability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 125-125: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 20-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

Comment on lines 6 to 19
export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker({ step }: { step: number }) {
const router = useRouter();

return (
<div>
<ColdEmailForm
buttonText="Next"
onSuccess={() => {
router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
}}
/>
</div>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance the component with more context and user options.

While the current implementation is functional, it could benefit from incorporating more of the suggestions from previous reviews:

  1. Add a brief explanation of what the Cold Email Blocker does and its benefits.
  2. Provide an option to skip this step if the user isn't ready to set it up.
  3. Consider adding more UI elements for a comprehensive onboarding experience.

Here's a suggested improvement:

export function OnboardingColdEmailBlocker({ step }: { step: number }) {
  const router = useRouter();

  const handleSkip = () => {
    router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
  };

  return (
    <div className="space-y-4">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Set Up Cold Email Blocker</h2>
      <p className="text-gray-600">
        Protect your inbox from unwanted cold emails. This feature automatically filters out unsolicited messages,
        helping you focus on important communications.
      </p>
      <ColdEmailForm
        buttonText="Next"
        onSuccess={() => {
          router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
        }}
      />
      <button onClick={handleSkip} className="text-sm text-gray-500">
        Skip for now
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

This enhancement provides more context, adds a skip option, and improves the overall user experience during the onboarding process.

Comment on lines 11 to 16
<ColdEmailForm
buttonText="Next"
onSuccess={() => {
router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
}}
/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding error handling and user feedback.

The current implementation handles the success case well, but it might benefit from additional error handling and user feedback:

  1. Add an onError prop to handle potential failures in the form submission.
  2. Provide visual feedback to the user during form submission (e.g., loading state).

Here's a suggested improvement:

<ColdEmailForm
  buttonText="Next"
  onSuccess={() => {
    router.push(`/onboarding?step=${step + 1}`);
  }}
  onError={(error) => {
    // Handle error, e.g., show an error message to the user
    console.error("Failed to set up Cold Email Blocker:", error);
  }}
  // Assuming ColdEmailForm accepts a loading prop
  renderButton={({ loading }) => (
    <Button type="submit" disabled={loading}>
      {loading ? "Setting up..." : "Next"}
    </Button>
  )}
/>

This enhancement improves error handling and provides better user feedback during the form submission process.

description: "One-click unsubscribe from emails you never read.",
content: <OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber />,
videoId: "T1rnooV4OYc",
active: !searchParams.step || searchParams.step === "1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify active property logic in Steps configuration

The current implementation uses string comparisons for the active property. We can simplify this by using the parsed step value.

Apply this diff to simplify the active property logic:

-  active: !searchParams.step || searchParams.step === "1",
+  active: step === 1,
-  active: searchParams.step === "2",
+  active: step === 2,
-  active: searchParams.step === "3",
+  active: step === 3,
-  active: searchParams.step === "4",
+  active: step === 4,

This change assumes you've implemented the step parsing as suggested in the previous comment. It simplifies the logic and makes it more consistent across all steps.

Also applies to: 36-36, 42-43, 49-49, 55-55

Comment on lines 26 to 28
selectedStep={
searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve parsing and validation of the step parameter

The current implementation of selectedStep has a few issues:

  1. It uses the global parseInt without a radix.
  2. There's no validation of the step value.
  3. It doesn't handle potential NaN values.

Apply this diff to improve the parsing and validation:

selectedStep={
-  searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined
+  (() => {
+    const step = Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || '1', 10);
+    return Number.isNaN(step) || step < 1 || step > 4 ? 1 : step;
+  })()
}

This change ensures that:

  1. We use Number.parseInt with a radix of 10.
  2. We validate the step value to be between 1 and 4.
  3. We default to step 1 if the value is invalid or missing.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
selectedStep={
searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined
}
selectedStep={
(() => {
const step = Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || '1', 10);
return Number.isNaN(step) || step < 1 || step > 4 ? 1 : step;
})()
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 27-27: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ export function Tabs(props: {
searchParam?: string;
}) {
const { children, className, searchParam = "tab", ...other } = props;
const searchParams = useSearchParams()!;
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Issues Found: Missing null checks for searchParams

The recent change allows searchParams to be undefined, but its usages do not account for this possibility:

  • searchParams.get(searchParam) may throw an error if searchParams is undefined.
  • new URLSearchParams(searchParams) should handle undefined gracefully, but it's good to verify its intended behavior.

Please add appropriate null checks or default handling to ensure that searchParams is defined before invoking its methods.

🔗 Analysis chain

Approve: Improved type safety by removing non-null assertion

This change enhances the type safety of the code by allowing searchParams to be potentially undefined, which is the correct type returned by useSearchParams(). This aligns better with React's best practices for handling hook return values.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify that all usages of searchParams in this file properly handle the case where it might be undefined. Run the following script to check for potential issues:

If any usages are found that don't account for the possibility of searchParams being undefined, consider adding appropriate null checks or default values.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of searchParams that might need adjustment

# Test: Search for usages of searchParams
rg '\bsearchParams\b' apps/web/components/ui/tabs.tsx

Length of output: 288

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +64 to +69
const results = messages.map((message) => ({
emailId: message.id,
from: message.headers.from,
subject: message.headers.subject,
snippet: message.snippet,
}));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add null checks for message headers to prevent runtime errors

When mapping over messages, the code assumes that message.headers and its properties (from, subject) are always defined. If any of these properties are undefined, it could lead to runtime errors.

Consider adding optional chaining and default values to handle missing headers:

const results = messages.map((message) => ({
  emailId: message.id,
- from: message.headers.from,
- subject: message.headers.subject,
+ from: message.headers?.from || "",
+ subject: message.headers?.subject || "",
  snippet: message.snippet,
}));
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const results = messages.map((message) => ({
emailId: message.id,
from: message.headers.from,
subject: message.headers.subject,
snippet: message.snippet,
}));
const results = messages.map((message) => ({
emailId: message.id,
from: message.headers?.from || "",
subject: message.headers?.subject || "",
snippet: message.snippet,
}));

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/app/(landing)/home/CTAButtons.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-21: Review overall impact of CTAButtons changes.

The modifications to the CTAButtons component have simplified the code by removing feature flag logic, but at the cost of flexibility in CTA text customization. Here's a summary of the changes:

  1. Removed: Feature flag-based text selection.
  2. Added: Hardcoded "Get Started" text.
  3. Maintained: Click event tracking with PostHog.

While these changes streamline the component, consider the following:

  1. A/B Testing: Ensure that removing dynamic text doesn't hinder your ability to test different CTAs.
  2. Internationalization: If multi-language support is planned, the hardcoded text may need to be replaced with a translatable string.
  3. Marketing Flexibility: Discuss with the marketing team if they need the ability to change CTA text without code changes.

Consider implementing a more flexible solution that balances code simplicity with marketing needs, such as using environment variables or a simple configuration file for CTA text.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1e1387 and 2b6adfc.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/home/CTAButtons.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome-upgrade/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/app/(landing)/home/CTAButtons.tsx (1)

4-4: LGTM: PostHog import retained for analytics.

The import of usePostHog from 'posthog-js/react' is correctly maintained, ensuring that the click event tracking functionality remains intact.

apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome-upgrade/page.tsx (1)

28-29: Consider the impact of removing trial features

The commented-out TrialFeature components remove important information about the trial:

  1. "100% no-risk trial"
  2. "Free for the first 7 days"

This change could significantly impact user perception and sign-up rates. If this is an intentional change in the business model or pricing strategy, ensure that:

  1. The rest of the application is consistent with this change.
  2. The onboarding process is adjusted to compensate for the removed trial period.
  3. Marketing materials and user communications are updated accordingly.

If this is a temporary change or still under consideration, it might be better to use a feature flag instead of commenting out the code.

To ensure consistency across the application, run the following script:

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (1)

16-16: Verify the significant price increase for the Co-Pilot tier

The price for PremiumTier.COPILOT_MONTHLY has been increased from 499 to 1500, which is a substantial change of about 200%. While this aligns with the premium nature of the Co-Pilot tier (including human assistance), such a significant increase warrants careful consideration.

Points to consider:

  1. Ensure this price change is intentional and aligns with the overall pricing strategy.
  2. Consider the impact on user adoption and perception of the Co-Pilot tier.
  3. Verify if any corresponding changes in the Co-Pilot tier's features or marketing strategy are needed to justify this new price point.
  4. Note that unlike other tiers, there's no annual discount for the Co-Pilot tier. Consider if this is intentional.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:

This will help identify any places where the old price might still be referenced or where price-related comments might need updating.

✅ Verification successful

Price update for Co-Pilot tier successfully verified

The price for PremiumTier.COPILOT_MONTHLY has been updated from 499 to 1500 consistently across the codebase. No references to the old price remain, and no other premium tiers have unexpected price values.

  • Verified that the old price (499) is no longer referenced.
  • Confirmed the new price (1500) is correctly set in apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts.
  • Ensured there are no outdated price-related comments.
  • Checked that all other premium tiers maintain their expected pricing.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any hardcoded references to the old Co-Pilot price

# Test: Search for any remaining instances of the old price (499)
rg -i '(copilot|co-pilot).*499' --type ts --type tsx

# Test: Verify the new price (1500) is used consistently
rg -i '(copilot|co-pilot).*1500' --type ts --type tsx

# Test: Check for any price-related comments that might need updating
rg -i 'copilot.*price' --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 240


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any hardcoded references to the old Co-Pilot price

# Test: Search for any remaining instances of the old price (499) in .ts and .tsx files
rg -i '(copilot|co-pilot).*499' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Verify the new price (1500) is used consistently in .ts and .tsx files
rg -i '(copilot|co-pilot).*1500' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Check for any price-related comments that might need updating in .ts and .tsx files
rg -i 'copilot.*price' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

Length of output: 229


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify price changes for PremiumTier.COPILOT_MONTHLY

# Test: Ensure no other references to the old price (499) exist specifically for COPILOT_MONTHLY
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.COPILOT_MONTHLY\s*:\s*499' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Confirm the new price (1500) is exclusively used for COPILOT_MONTHLY
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.COPILOT_MONTHLY\s*:\s*1500' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Broaden search for any price-related comments that might need updating
rg -i 'price.*copilot' --glob '*.{ts,tsx,md}'

# Test: Verify that no other premium tiers have unexpected price values
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.(?!COPILOT_MONTHLY).*:\s*\d+' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

Length of output: 516


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify price changes for PremiumTier.COPILOT_MONTHLY without using look-around

# Test: Ensure no other references to the old price (499) exist specifically for COPILOT_MONTHLY
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.COPILOT_MONTHLY\s*:\s*499' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Confirm the new price (1500) is exclusively used for COPILOT_MONTHLY
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.COPILOT_MONTHLY\s*:\s*1500' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'

# Test: Broaden search for any price-related comments that might need updating
rg -i 'price.*copilot' --glob '*.{ts,tsx,md}'

# Test: Verify that no other premium tiers have unexpected price values by listing all PremiumTier entries
rg -i 'PremiumTier\.\w+\s*:\s*\d+' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' | grep -v 'PremiumTier\.COPILOT_MONTHLY\s*:\s*1500'

Length of output: 295

@@ -24,8 +15,7 @@ export function CTAButtons() {
}}
color="blue"
>
{variants[(variant as string | undefined) || "control"] ||
variants.control}
Get Started
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider implications of hardcoded CTA text.

The button text has been hardcoded to "Get Started", replacing the previous dynamic text selection based on feature flags.

While this simplifies the code, it removes the ability to easily A/B test different CTA texts or adapt the text for different user segments. Consider whether this aligns with your current marketing and user acquisition strategies.

If you still need flexibility in CTA text, consider implementing a configuration-based approach:

const CTA_TEXT = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_CTA_TEXT || "Get Started";

// Then in the component:
<Button
  // ... other props ...
>
  {CTA_TEXT}
</Button>

This allows for easy text changes without code modifications, while maintaining simplicity.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx (1)

158-175: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for readability

The new getHref function effectively encapsulates the logic for generating the appropriate URL based on various conditions. This improves code readability and maintainability. Good job on handling different scenarios such as user login status, current plan, and custom CTA links.

To further enhance readability, consider using early returns for each condition. This can make the function's flow easier to follow:

function getHref(): string {
  if (!user) return "/login?next=/premium";
  if (isCurrentPlan) return "#";
  if (tier.ctaLink) return tier.ctaLink;

  return buildLemonUrl(
    attachUserInfo(tier.href[frequency.value], {
      id: user.id,
      email: user.email!,
      name: user.name,
    }),
    affiliateCode
  );
}

This structure makes it clearer that each condition leads to a specific return value.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 168-168: Forbidden non-null assertion.

(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b6adfc and 97a8277.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx

[error] 168-168: Forbidden non-null assertion.

(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (3)

153-153: Note the change in user flow for the Copilot tier.

The CTA for the Copilot tier has been changed from "Upgrade" to "Book a call". This change suggests a shift towards a more personalized approach for this premium tier.

Consider the following implications:

  1. This change may affect conversion rates and the user journey.
  2. Ensure that the call booking system is in place and can handle the potential increase in scheduling requests.
  3. Update any related documentation or user guides to reflect this new process.

To verify the consistency of this change across the codebase, you can run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in CTA changes and related components

# Test 1: Check for any remaining "Upgrade" CTAs related to Copilot
echo "Checking for 'Upgrade' CTAs related to Copilot:"
rg -i 'copilot.*upgrade|upgrade.*copilot' --type ts --type tsx

# Test 2: Verify consistency of "Book a call" CTA
echo "Checking consistency of 'Book a call' CTA:"
rg -i 'book a call' --type ts --type tsx

# Test 3: Look for any components or functions related to call booking
echo "Checking for call booking related components or functions:"
rg -i 'book.*call|call.*booking' --type ts --type tsx

This script will help ensure that the CTA change has been consistently applied and that necessary supporting components are in place.


154-154: Approve addition of ctaLink and verify environment variable.

The addition of the ctaLink property using env.NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK is a good approach for configurable call booking links.

To ensure proper implementation:

  1. Verify that NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK is properly set in all relevant environments (development, staging, production).
  2. Update the project documentation to include this new environment variable.
  3. Ensure that the component rendering this CTA correctly uses this new ctaLink property.

Run the following script to verify the usage of this new property:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK and ctaLink

# Test 1: Check for the declaration of NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK in environment files
echo "Checking for NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK in environment files:"
rg -i 'NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK' .env*

# Test 2: Verify usage of ctaLink in relevant components
echo "Checking usage of ctaLink in components:"
rg -i 'ctaLink' --type tsx

# Test 3: Look for any TODOs or comments related to call booking or CTAs
echo "Checking for related TODOs or comments:"
rg -i 'todo.*(call|cta)|//.*(call|cta)' --type ts --type tsx

This script will help ensure that the new ctaLink property is properly implemented and used across the project.


16-16: Verify the significant price increase for COPILOT_MONTHLY tier.

The price for the COPILOT_MONTHLY tier has been increased from 499 to 1500, which is a substantial change (about 200% increase).

Please confirm that this price change is intentional and aligns with the current business strategy. Consider the following:

  1. The impact on user acquisition and retention for this tier.
  2. The value proposition that justifies this price point.
  3. Any communication strategy to existing users about this change.

To help verify the intentionality and consistency of this change, you can run the following script:

This script will help ensure that the price change has been consistently applied and that there are no lingering references to the old price.

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx (2)

175-175: Approve the usage of getHref

The implementation of getHref and its usage in the component is well done. By extracting the URL generation logic into a separate function, you've improved the readability of the JSX. The href variable is correctly used in the a tag, making the code more maintainable and easier to understand.


Line range hint 1-468: Summary of changes and suggestions

The changes to the Pricing component, particularly the introduction of the getHref function, have improved the code structure and readability. The function effectively encapsulates the logic for generating URLs based on various conditions, making the code more maintainable.

Key points from the review:

  1. The getHref function is well-implemented, with a suggestion to use early returns for improved readability.
  2. The usage of getHref in the component is appropriate and enhances code clarity.
  3. There's a recommendation to handle the potential for null email values more safely, avoiding the use of non-null assertions.

Overall, these changes represent a positive step in improving the codebase. Addressing the minor suggestions will further enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 168-168: Forbidden non-null assertion.

(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (3)

Line range hint 32-38: LGTM: Enhanced functionality with TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal.

The addition of TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal components enhances the functionality of the ColdEmailSettings component. This provides users with more options for managing cold email settings.

Consider extracting the new div with TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal into a separate component for better organization and reusability. For example:

const ColdEmailAdditionalSettings = ({ coldEmailPrompt, refetch }) => (
  <div className="mt-2 flex items-center gap-2">
    <TestRules />
    <ColdEmailPromptModal
      coldEmailPrompt={coldEmailPrompt}
      refetch={refetch}
    />
  </div>
);

Then use it in the ColdEmailSettings component:

<>
  <ColdEmailForm coldEmailBlocker={data.coldEmailBlocker} />
  <ColdEmailAdditionalSettings coldEmailPrompt={data.coldEmailPrompt} refetch={mutate} />
</>

Line range hint 65-84: Add onSuccess to useCallback dependency array.

The onSubmit function uses the onSuccess prop, but it's not included in the dependency array of useCallback. This could lead to stale closures if the onSuccess function changes between renders.

Update the useCallback dependency array to include onSuccess:

const onSubmit: SubmitHandler<UpdateColdEmailSettingsBody> = useCallback(
  async (data) => {
    // ... existing code ...
  },
  [onSuccess], // Add onSuccess to the dependency array
);

122-132: LGTM: Improved form handling with react-hook-form.

The use of Controller from react-hook-form and the RadioGroup component improves form state management and provides a better user interface. The addition of descriptions for each option enhances user understanding.

Consider adding error handling for the RadioGroup component. While you're passing the error prop, it's not clear how errors are displayed. You might want to add an error message display:

<Controller
  name="coldEmailBlocker"
  control={control}
  render={({ field }) => (
    <>
      <RadioGroup
        label="How should we handle cold emails?"
        options={options}
        {...field}
      />
      {errors.coldEmailBlocker && (
        <p className="text-red-500 text-sm mt-1">{errors.coldEmailBlocker.message}</p>
      )}
    </>
  )}
/>
apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (1)

16-16: Summary of Copilot tier changes and their potential impact

The changes to the Copilot tier are significant:

  1. The monthly price has increased from 499 to 1500.
  2. Additional email pricing has been introduced at 250.
  3. The CTA has changed from "Upgrade" to "Book a call".
  4. A new ctaLink property has been added to support the new CTA.

These changes collectively represent a shift towards a more premium, high-touch approach for the Copilot tier. While this may lead to higher revenue per customer, it could also impact user acquisition rates. It's crucial to monitor key metrics following these changes, including:

  • Conversion rates for the Copilot tier
  • User feedback and satisfaction scores
  • Churn rates for existing Copilot users (if applicable)
  • Overall revenue impact

Consider conducting A/B testing if possible to gauge the impact of these changes before full implementation.

Also applies to: 27-27, 153-154, 168-168

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97a8277 and 4df9f51.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingColdEmailBlocker.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx

[error] 15-15: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (3)

1-60: Overall assessment of the OnboardingPage component

The OnboardingPage component effectively implements the onboarding flow described in the PR objectives. It provides a structured approach to guide users through various steps of setting up their account and getting familiar with Inbox Zero's features.

Some key points:

  1. The component uses a Steps component to manage the onboarding process, which aligns well with the goal of creating a guided user experience.
  2. Each step (Bulk Unsubscriber, AI Personal Assistant, Cold Emailer Blocker, and Finish) corresponds to a key feature or action, helping users understand and set up the main functionalities of the app.
  3. The use of searchParams allows for dynamic rendering based on the current step, enabling a smooth navigation experience.

The overall structure and implementation of this component look good and align with the PR objectives. Once the suggested improvements are applied, this component will provide a solid foundation for the onboarding process.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 15-15: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)


5-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix import path for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component

The import statement for OnboardingAIEmailAssistant doesn't match the component name. This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential errors.

Apply this diff to fix the import path:

-import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant";
+import { OnboardingAIEmailAssistant } from "@/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingAIEmailAssistant";

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


10-14: ⚠️ Potential issue

Update type definition for optional step parameter

The current type definition for searchParams.step doesn't reflect that it might be undefined. This could lead to potential type errors or unexpected behavior.

Apply this diff to adjust the type definition:

 export default function OnboardingPage({
   searchParams,
 }: {
-  searchParams: { step: string };
+  searchParams: { step?: string };
 }) {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (3)

4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated to reflect new component usage.

The changes in import statements accurately reflect the shift towards using react-hook-form for form management and the replacement of the Select component with RadioGroup. These updates align well with the refactoring of the ColdEmailForm component.

Also applies to: 14-14, 21-21


45-53: LGTM: Improved ColdEmailForm component signature and props.

The updated component signature with new props buttonText and onSuccess enhances the flexibility and reusability of the ColdEmailForm component. This change allows for better customization in different contexts, such as during onboarding or in settings pages.


Line range hint 1-141: Overall improvements to ColdEmailSettings and ColdEmailForm components.

The changes in this file significantly enhance the cold email settings feature:

  1. The use of react-hook-form improves form state management.
  2. The RadioGroup component provides a better user interface for selecting options.
  3. The addition of descriptions for each option enhances user understanding.
  4. The new props in ColdEmailForm increase its flexibility and reusability.

These improvements align well with the PR objective of creating an onboarding flow to help users understand how to use the app.

Remaining minor concerns:

  1. Consider adding onSuccess to the useCallback dependency array.
  2. Remove useMemo for the static options array.
  3. Improve error handling display for the RadioGroup component.

Addressing these minor issues will further improve the code quality and maintainability.

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/config.ts (4)

27-27: Verify introduction of additional email cost for COPILOT_MONTHLY tier

The price for additional emails in the COPILOT_MONTHLY tier has been changed from 0 to 250. This introduces a cost where there was previously none.

Please confirm that this new pricing structure for additional emails is intentional. Consider how this might affect the value proposition for users with multiple email accounts.

To verify the change across the codebase, run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY additional email price
rg -i '(0|250).*COPILOT_MONTHLY.*additional' --type ts --type tsx

This will help ensure the additional email pricing change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.


153-153: Approve CTA change and verify associated workflow

The change from "Upgrade" to "Book a call" for the Copilot tier's CTA is appropriate given the tier's premium positioning and price point.

This change suggests a shift towards a more personalized sales approach for the Copilot tier. Please ensure that:

  1. The call booking process is in place and functioning correctly.
  2. The sales team is prepared for an increase in call volumes.
  3. The user journey from call booking to upgrade is smooth and well-defined.

To verify the change across the codebase, run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old or new CTA text for Copilot tier
rg -i '(Upgrade|Book a call).*copilot' --type ts --type tsx

This will help ensure the CTA change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.


154-154: Approve ctaLink addition and verify environment variable

The addition of the ctaLink property to the copilotTier object and its inclusion as an optional property in the tiers array type definition are appropriate changes that support the new "Book a call" CTA.

Please ensure that:

  1. The NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK environment variable is properly set in all relevant environments (development, staging, production).
  2. The link is functional and leads to the correct call booking page or system.

To verify the environment variable, run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK is set in .env files
grep NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK .env*

# Search for any other uses of NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK in the codebase
rg 'NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK' --type ts --type tsx

This will help ensure the NEXT_PUBLIC_CALL_LINK is properly set and consistently used throughout the codebase.

Also applies to: 168-168


16-16: Verify significant price increase for COPILOT_MONTHLY tier

The price for the COPILOT_MONTHLY tier has been increased from 499 to 1500, which is a substantial change (about 200% increase).

Please confirm that this significant price adjustment is intentional and aligns with the current business strategy. Consider the potential impact on user acquisition and retention rates.

To verify the change across the codebase, run the following script:

This will help ensure the price change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Re-attempting search for COPILOT_MONTHLY price references

The previous search encountered errors. Please run the following updated script to ensure all references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY prices are accurately identified:


Re-attempting search for COPILOT_MONTHLY price references with corrected file type specifications

The previous search encountered an issue recognizing the tsx file type. Please run the following updated script to accurately identify all references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY prices in both .ts and .tsx files:


Verified the COPILOT_MONTHLY price increase is consistent

No additional references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY prices were found in the codebase, confirming that the price change is isolated and intentional.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY price
rg -i '(499|1500).*COPILOT_MONTHLY' --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 151


Script:

# 
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY price
rg -i '(499|1500).*COPILOT_MONTHLY' --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 86


Script:

# 
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old or new COPILOT_MONTHLY price in .ts and .tsx files
rg -i '(499|1500).*COPILOT_MONTHLY' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

Length of output: 58

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

1-179: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with room for improvements

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-designed and effectively handles the bulk unsubscribe functionality during onboarding. The code is generally clean and follows good React practices.

Key strengths:

  1. Proper separation of concerns between data fetching, main component, and row components.
  2. Effective use of custom hooks for data fetching and unsubscribe functionality.
  3. Good error and loading state handling.

Implementing the suggested improvements will:

  1. Enhance type safety and reduce bundle size through optimized imports.
  2. Improve performance with memoization of sorted newsletter data.
  3. Increase robustness in email parsing and percentage calculations.
  4. Ensure proper data refresh after unsubscribe actions.

These changes will result in a more maintainable, performant, and reliable component.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

}: {
searchParams: { step: string };
}) {
const step = searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve parsing and validation of the step parameter

The current implementation of step parsing has a few issues:

  1. It uses the global parseInt without a radix.
  2. There's no validation of the step value.
  3. It doesn't handle potential NaN values.

Apply this diff to improve the parsing and validation:

-const step = searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined;
+const step = (() => {
+  const parsedStep = Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || '1', 10);
+  return Number.isNaN(parsedStep) || parsedStep < 1 || parsedStep > 4 ? 1 : parsedStep;
+})();

This change ensures that:

  1. We use Number.parseInt with a radix of 10.
  2. We validate the step value to be between 1 and 4.
  3. We default to step 1 if the value is invalid or missing.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const step = searchParams.step ? parseInt(searchParams.step) : undefined;
const step = (() => {
const parsedStep = Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || '1', 10);
return Number.isNaN(parsedStep) || parsedStep < 1 || parsedStep > 4 ? 1 : parsedStep;
})();
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 15-15: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.

ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.

(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
@elie222 elie222 changed the title WIP: Onboarding Onboarding Oct 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 18

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1)

8-8: Consider adding a comment to explain maxDuration.

The purpose of maxDuration is not immediately clear from the context. Consider adding a brief comment to explain its usage and why it's set to 120.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (1)

88-117: Approve changes to options array and suggest refactor

The updates to the options array, including the addition of descriptions and minor label changes, improve the user experience and clarity. These changes are approved.

However, the useMemo wrapper for the static options array is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.

Consider removing the useMemo wrapper for the options array:

const options: {
  value: ColdEmailSetting;
  label: string;
  description: string;
}[] = [
  {
    value: ColdEmailSetting.ARCHIVE_AND_LABEL,
    label: "Archive & Label",
    description: "Automatically archive and label cold emails",
  },
  // ... other options ...
];
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (1)

1-32: LGTM! Consider optimizing imports for better tree-shaking.

The imports and schema definition look good. The use of Zod for input validation is a great choice for type safety and runtime checks.

Consider using import type for type-only imports to potentially improve tree-shaking:

-import { useForm } from "react-hook-form";
-import type { SubmitHandler } from "react-hook-form";
+import { useForm } from "react-hook-form";
+import type { SubmitHandler } from "react-hook-form";

-import { RulesExamplesResponse } from "@/app/api/user/rules/examples/route";
+import type { RulesExamplesResponse } from "@/app/api/user/rules/examples/route";
apps/web/app/(landing)/home/Footer.tsx (1)

Line range hint 130-142: Enhance accessibility for external links

While the current implementation correctly handles external links using the target attribute, it's a good practice to provide additional context for screen reader users when a link opens in a new tab or window.

Consider adding an aria-label to external links to inform users that the link will open in a new tab. Here's a suggested implementation:

 <Link
   href={item.href}
   target={item.target}
   prefetch={item.target !== "_blank"}
+  aria-label={item.target === "_blank" ? `${item.name} (opens in a new tab)` : undefined}
   className="text-sm leading-6 text-gray-600 hover:text-gray-900"
 >
   {item.name}
+  {item.target === "_blank" && <span className="sr-only"> (opens in a new tab)</span>}
 </Link>

This change improves the user experience for screen reader users by providing clear information about the link behavior.

apps/web/components/email-list/EmailPanel.tsx (2)

Line range hint 105-115: Consider keeping the role="list" attribute for accessibility.

The removal of the role="list" attribute from the <ul> element might affect accessibility for screen readers. While it simplifies the markup, it could potentially impact users relying on assistive technologies. Consider keeping the attribute to ensure proper semantic meaning for the list structure.

To address this, you can revert the change by adding the role="list" attribute back:

-      <ul className="space-y-2 sm:space-y-4">
+      <ul role="list" className="space-y-2 sm:space-y-4">

Verify the necessity of LLM-generated MIME types and consider using a comprehensive MIME type library.

The mimeTypeToString function in EmailPanel.tsx includes the following MIME types flagged as LLM-generated:

  • "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
  • "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"
  • "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation"
  • "application/vnd.ms-excel"
  • "application/vnd.ms-powerpoint"
  • "application/vnd.ms-word"

Please verify the necessity and accuracy of these MIME types. Additionally, consider utilizing a library like mime-types to handle MIME type mappings more comprehensively and reduce manual maintenance.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 330-358: Verify LLM-generated MIME types and consider using a comprehensive MIME type library.

The mimeTypeToString function provides a useful mapping for common MIME types. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The comment "LLM generated. Need to check they're actually needed" indicates that some MIME types require verification.
  2. The function might benefit from using a more comprehensive MIME type library to handle a wider range of file types.

To address these points:

  1. Verify the necessity and accuracy of the LLM-generated MIME types.
  2. Consider using a library like mime-types for more robust MIME type handling.

Here's a script to help verify the usage of these MIME types in the codebase:

If you decide to use a MIME type library, you can refactor the function like this:

import mime from 'mime-types';

function mimeTypeToString(mimeType: string): string {
  const extension = mime.extension(mimeType);
  return extension ? extension.toUpperCase() : mimeType;
}

This approach would provide more comprehensive and accurate MIME type handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of potentially unnecessary MIME types

# Test: Search for usage of specific MIME types
echo "Searching for usage of potentially unnecessary MIME types:"
rg -i "application/vnd\.openxmlformats-officedocument\.(wordprocessingml\.document|spreadsheetml\.sheet|presentationml\.presentation)|application/vnd\.ms-(excel|powerpoint|word)"

echo "If no results are found, consider removing these MIME types from the mimeTypeToString function."

Length of output: 1147

apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx (1)

31-31: Consider removing the aria-label from the <fieldset>

Since you are rendering a <Label> component inside the <fieldset>, the aria-label attribute on the <fieldset> may be redundant. Screen readers will associate the label with the fieldset content automatically.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4df9f51 and 378f97b.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/(landing)/home/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/SideNav.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/email-list/EmailList.tsx (0 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/email-list/EmailPanel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/web/components/email-list/EmailList.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • apps/web/components/SideNav.tsx
  • apps/web/utils/actions/user.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 117-117: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx

[error] 126-126: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx

[error] 11-11: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx

[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx

[error] 168-168: Forbidden non-null assertion.

(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)

apps/web/components/RadioGroup.tsx

[error] 2-3: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts

[error] 29-29: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.

Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal

(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)


[error] 71-73: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 104-104: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)

🔇 Additional comments (28)
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingNextButton.tsx (3)

1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.

The import statements are well-organized and include all necessary components and hooks for the OnboardingNextButton functionality.


13-21: LGTM: Clean and efficient render logic.

The component's render logic is well-structured and follows React and Next.js best practices:

  • Proper use of the Button component from your UI library.
  • Effective use of Next.js Link component for navigation.
  • The scroll={false} prop prevents unnecessary scrolling during navigation, enhancing user experience.
  • Clear and appropriate button text for an onboarding flow.

1-22: Overall: Excellent implementation of the OnboardingNextButton component.

This component is well-designed and effectively fulfills its role in the onboarding flow:

  • It has a clear, single responsibility: navigating to the next step.
  • Error handling for missing or invalid step parameters is robust.
  • The code is concise, readable, and follows React and Next.js best practices.

Great job addressing previous review comments and improving the overall quality of the component. With the minor suggestion to use Number.isNaN, this component is ready for production use.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 11-11: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (4)

1-6: LGTM: Import statements are correct and relevant.

The import statements are well-organized and include all necessary components for the onboarding page. The previously flagged issue with the OnboardingAIEmailAssistant import has been resolved.


10-14: LGTM: Component declaration and props are well-defined.

The OnboardingPage component is correctly declared with appropriate props. The type definition for searchParams has been updated to make step optional, addressing the previous review comment.


1-62: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for minor improvements.

The OnboardingPage component is well-structured and implements a clear onboarding flow using the Steps component. The suggested improvements, including enhancing step parsing, adding a comment for maxDuration, and refining the Steps configuration, will further improve the code's robustness and readability. These changes will contribute to a more maintainable and error-resistant implementation of the onboarding process.


29-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refine Steps component configuration.

The Steps component configuration is well-structured, but can be improved:

  1. Simplify the active property logic as suggested in previous reviews:
-active: !step || step === 1,
+active: step === 1,

Apply this change to all steps.

  1. Update the selectedStep prop to use the refined step parsing logic:
-selectedStep={step}
+selectedStep={step}

These changes will make the code more consistent and robust.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/Steps.tsx (2)

1-21: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured

The imports, "use client" directive, and component declaration are appropriate for the functionality of the Steps component. The props interface is well-defined with clear types, which is good for maintainability and type safety.


52-89: LGTM: Step content rendering is well-structured

The rendering of step content, including the title, description, and optional video content, is well-implemented. The use of custom Typography components (TypographyH3 and SectionDescription) promotes consistency in the UI. The conditional rendering for the video content is correctly implemented using the OnboardingModal component.

apps/web/app/(app)/cold-email-blocker/ColdEmailSettings.tsx (6)

4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly

The new import statements are consistent with the changes in the component implementation. The addition of Controller from 'react-hook-form' and RadioGroup from '@/components/RadioGroup' aligns with the updated form handling approach.

Also applies to: 14-14, 21-21


Line range hint 32-37: LGTM: Improved layout for TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal

The addition of a wrapper div with flex layout and gap improves the grouping and spacing of the TestRules and ColdEmailPromptModal components. This change enhances the visual structure of the form.


45-53: LGTM: Enhanced ColdEmailForm component props

The ColdEmailForm component has been updated with additional props (buttonText and onSuccess), improving its flexibility and reusability. The type definitions are correct and consistent with the component's usage.


55-55: LGTM: Improved form initialization

The form initialization has been enhanced by including the control object from useForm and adding a default value for coldEmailBlocker. These changes improve the robustness of the form handling and ensure a valid initial state.

Also applies to: 60-62


80-80: LGTM: Improved form submission handling

The onSubmit function has been updated to call the onSuccess callback after a successful form submission. The onSuccess prop has also been correctly added to the useCallback dependency array, ensuring that the latest version of the callback is always used.

Also applies to: 83-83


121-132: LGTM: Improved form rendering and flexibility

The form rendering has been significantly improved:

  1. The use of the Controller component from react-hook-form enhances form state management.
  2. The RadioGroup component provides a better user interface for option selection.
  3. The submit button text is now customizable, increasing the component's flexibility.

These changes align with react-hook-form best practices and improve the overall user experience.

Also applies to: 135-138

apps/web/utils/ai/example-matches/find-example-matches.ts (5)

1-115: Overall implementation review

The implementation of find-example-matches.ts provides a well-structured approach to finding example email matches using AI. The code is generally well-organized and follows good practices. The suggested improvements focus on optimizing performance, enhancing type safety, and preventing potential runtime errors.

Key strengths:

  1. Clear separation of concerns with distinct functions for different tasks.
  2. Use of Zod for schema validation.
  3. Thoughtful error handling in most parts of the code.

Areas for improvement:

  1. Replacing console.log with proper logging.
  2. Optimizing performance in loops and reduce operations.
  3. Enhancing null checks and type safety.

After addressing the suggested improvements, this implementation will be more robust and efficient.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 29-29: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.

Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal

(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)


[error] 71-73: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)


[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 104-104: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)


27-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace console.log with proper logging mechanism

Using console.log in production code is generally discouraged. Consider removing this statement or replacing it with a proper logging mechanism that can be controlled based on the environment.

Apply this diff to address the issue:

- console.log(`findExampleMatches. rulesPrompt: ${rulesPrompt}`);
+ // TODO: Replace with a proper logging mechanism or remove if not needed

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use 'import type' for type-only imports

To optimize the code and ensure type imports are removed during transpilation, consider using 'import type' for the UserAIFields import.

Apply this diff to update the import:

- import { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";
+ import type { UserAIFields } from "@/utils/llms/types";

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 4-5: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


71-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace forEach with for...of loop for better performance

Using a for...of loop instead of forEach can improve performance, especially when working with large arrays.

Apply this diff to refactor the code:

- results.forEach((result) => {
-   listedEmails[result.emailId] = result;
- });
+ for (const result of results) {
+   listedEmails[result.emailId] = result;
+ }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 71-73: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.

(lint/complexity/noForEach)


64-69: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add null checks for message headers

When mapping over messages, the code assumes that message.headers and its properties are always defined. This could lead to runtime errors if any of these properties are undefined.

Consider adding optional chaining and default values to handle potentially missing headers:

const results = messages.map((message) => ({
  emailId: message.id,
- from: message.headers.from,
- subject: message.headers.subject,
+ from: message.headers?.from ?? "",
+ subject: message.headers?.subject ?? "",
  snippet: message.snippet,
}));

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)

1-187: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor improvement opportunities

The OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber component is well-structured and effectively manages newsletter unsubscriptions during the onboarding process. It demonstrates good practices such as:

  1. Proper error handling and loading states
  2. Performance optimizations using useMemo
  3. Modular component structure

The suggested improvements mainly focus on:

  1. Enhancing type safety
  2. Preventing potential division by zero errors
  3. Optimizing the unsubscribe button implementation

Implementing these minor changes will further improve the component's robustness and maintainability. Great job on creating a solid foundation for the onboarding process!

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 38-38: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 117-117: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 4-5: Some named imports are only used as types.

This import is only used as a type.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)


[error] 17-21: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx (2)

34-43: LGTM! Clean and well-structured main component.

The OnboardingAIEmailAssistant component is well-organized and follows React best practices. The use of state to manage the visibility of the next button is appropriate, and the component composition is clean.


1-181: Overall, well-structured component with room for minor improvements

The OnboardingEmailAssistant component is well-implemented, utilizing modern React practices and appropriate libraries for form management and data fetching. The code is clean, modular, and follows good component composition principles.

Main areas for improvement:

  1. Complete the form submission logic (lines 72-86).
  2. Use a POST request for sending prompt data to avoid URL length limitations (lines 55-59).
  3. Implement a dedicated Textarea component for better accessibility (lines 91-101).
  4. Use more specific types, especially for error handling (lines 120-128).
  5. Optimize imports for better tree-shaking (various import statements).

Addressing these points will enhance the component's robustness, performance, and maintainability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 126-126: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

apps/web/app/(landing)/home/Footer.tsx (1)

130-130: Verify accessibility after removing role="list"

The removal of the role="list" attribute from the <ul> element aligns with the changes made in other components. While this simplifies the markup and removes redundancy for most modern screen readers, it's important to ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact accessibility across different browser and screen reader combinations.

To ensure continued accessibility, please run the following script to check for any other instances of role="list" on <ul> elements and verify consistency across the codebase:

This script will help identify any remaining instances of role="list" on <ul> elements, allowing you to ensure consistency across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Removal of role="list" on <ul> elements verified

No other instances of role="list" found on <ul> elements, ensuring consistency across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining instances of role="list" on <ul> elements

# Search for <ul> elements with role="list"
echo "Searching for <ul> elements with role=\"list\":"
rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' --type tsx --type jsx

# Count the occurrences
count=$(rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' --type tsx --type jsx | wc -l)
echo "Total occurrences: $count"

# If count is greater than 0, suggest reviewing for consistency
if [ $count -gt 0 ]; then
  echo "Consider reviewing the above instances for consistency with this change."
else
  echo "No other instances found. The change is consistent across the codebase."
fi

Length of output: 502


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining instances of role="list" on <ul> elements

# Search for <ul> elements with role="list"
echo "Searching for <ul> elements with role=\"list\":"
rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' --type typescriptreact --type javascriptreact

# Count the occurrences
count=$(rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' --type typescriptreact --type javascriptreact | wc -l)
echo "Total occurrences: $count"

# If count is greater than 0, suggest reviewing for consistency
if [ $count -gt 0 ]; then
  echo "Consider reviewing the above instances for consistency with this change."
else
  echo "No other instances found. The change is consistent across the codebase."
fi

Length of output: 574


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining instances of role="list" on <ul> elements

# Search for <ul> elements with role="list" in .tsx and .jsx files
echo "Searching for <ul> elements with role=\"list\" in .tsx and .jsx files:"
rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx'

# Count the occurrences
count=$(rg -i '<ul.*role="list".*>' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' | wc -l)
echo "Total occurrences: $count"

# If count is greater than 0, suggest reviewing for consistency
if [ $count -gt 0 ]; then
  echo "Consider reviewing the above instances for consistency with this change."
else
  echo "No other instances found. The change is consistent across the codebase."
fi

Length of output: 492

apps/web/components/email-list/EmailPanel.tsx (3)

Line range hint 118-270: Improved clarity for ForwardIcon button action.

The change to directly link the onClick event of the ForwardIcon button to the onForward function improves the clarity and maintainability of the code. This modification ensures that the forward action is triggered correctly and makes the code more readable.


Line range hint 272-295: Well-implemented HtmlEmail function with performance optimizations.

The HtmlEmail function is well-implemented with several notable features:

  1. Use of useMemo for srcDoc optimization.
  2. Efficient useCallback for the onLoad event.
  3. Dynamic height adjustment for the iframe with a buffer to prevent minimal scrollbars.

These optimizations contribute to better performance and user experience.


Line range hint 1-358: Overall, well-implemented email handling components with minor suggestions for improvement.

The EmailPanel.tsx file demonstrates a well-structured implementation of email handling components. The code makes good use of React hooks and includes performance optimizations. The suggested improvements are minor:

  1. Consider reinstating the role="list" attribute for better accessibility.
  2. Verify and potentially refactor the MIME type handling.

These changes would further enhance the already solid implementation.

apps/web/app/(app)/premium/Pricing.tsx (1)

175-175: Good use of the new getHref function

The usage of the newly introduced getHref function is clean and effective. It simplifies the JSX by moving the complex logic for determining the href into a separate function, which improves readability and maintainability.

Comment on lines +7 to +11
export function OnboardingNextButton() {
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
const stepParam = searchParams.get("step");
const currentStep = stepParam ? Number.parseInt(stepParam) : 1;
const nextStep = isNaN(currentStep) ? 2 : currentStep + 1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Great improvements on step parameter parsing, but consider using Number.isNaN.

The step parameter parsing has been significantly improved, addressing previous concerns about error handling and type safety. Well done!

However, there's one small improvement we can make:

Replace isNaN with Number.isNaN for safer type checking:

- const nextStep = isNaN(currentStep) ? 2 : currentStep + 1;
+ const nextStep = Number.isNaN(currentStep) ? 2 : currentStep + 1;

This change ensures that we're using the more precise Number.isNaN function, which doesn't attempt type coercion and is generally safer.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export function OnboardingNextButton() {
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
const stepParam = searchParams.get("step");
const currentStep = stepParam ? Number.parseInt(stepParam) : 1;
const nextStep = isNaN(currentStep) ? 2 : currentStep + 1;
export function OnboardingNextButton() {
const searchParams = useSearchParams();
const stepParam = searchParams.get("step");
const currentStep = stepParam ? Number.parseInt(stepParam) : 1;
const nextStep = Number.isNaN(currentStep) ? 2 : currentStep + 1;
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 11-11: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

Comment on lines +15 to +17
const step = searchParams.step
? Number.parseInt(searchParams.step)
: undefined;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve step parsing and validation.

The current step parsing logic can be enhanced for better robustness:

  1. Add a radix to Number.parseInt.
  2. Validate the parsed value to ensure it's within the expected range.
  3. Handle potential NaN values.

Consider applying this improvement:

const step = (() => {
  const parsedStep = Number.parseInt(searchParams.step || '1', 10);
  return Number.isNaN(parsedStep) || parsedStep < 1 || parsedStep > 4 ? 1 : parsedStep;
})();

This ensures that step is always a valid number between 1 and 4, defaulting to 1 for invalid inputs.

Comment on lines +22 to +31
const router = useRouter();
const stepRefs = useRef<(HTMLLIElement | null)[]>([]);

useEffect(() => {
if (!selectedStep) return;
const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < steps.length) {
stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
}
}, [selectedStep, steps.length]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize useEffect dependencies

The current implementation of the useEffect hook is functional, but it can be optimized to prevent unnecessary re-renders. Consider using a ref to store the steps.length:

const stepsLengthRef = useRef(steps.length);

useEffect(() => {
  stepsLengthRef.current = steps.length;
}, [steps]);

useEffect(() => {
  if (!selectedStep) return;
  const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
  if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < stepsLengthRef.current) {
    stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
  }
}, [selectedStep]);

This change will prevent the effect from re-running when only the content of the steps changes, but not their number, potentially improving performance.

Comment on lines +33 to +51
return (
<ul className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={step.title}
ref={(el) => {
if (el) stepRefs.current[stepIdx] = el;
}}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve accessibility for keyboard navigation

The current implementation uses an onClick handler on the <li> element, which raises accessibility concerns. To improve keyboard navigation and address the static analysis hint, consider the following changes:

  1. Wrap the clickable content in a <button> element.
  2. Add keyboard event handlers to support navigation via keyboard.
  3. Use aria-current to indicate the active step.

Here's a suggested implementation:

<ul className="space-y-6">
  {steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
    <li
      key={step.title}
      ref={(el) => {
        if (el) stepRefs.current[stepIdx] = el;
      }}
      className="relative flex gap-x-4"
    >
      <button
        onClick={() => {
          if (!step.active) {
            router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
              scroll: false,
            });
          }
        }}
        onKeyDown={(e) => {
          if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
            e.preventDefault();
            if (!step.active) {
              router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
                scroll: false,
              });
            }
          }
        }}
        className="flex-1 text-left"
        disabled={step.active}
        aria-current={step.active ? 'step' : undefined}
      >
        {/* Existing step content */}
      </button>
    </li>
  ))}
</ul>

These changes will significantly improve the accessibility of the component and address the static analysis hint.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)

Comment on lines +1 to +94
"use client";

import { useEffect, useRef } from "react";
import { useRouter } from "next/navigation";
import { SectionDescription, TypographyH3 } from "@/components/Typography";
import { cn } from "@/utils";
import { OnboardingModal } from "@/components/OnboardingModal";

export function Steps({
selectedStep,
steps,
}: {
selectedStep: number | undefined;
steps: {
title: string;
description: string;
content: React.ReactNode;
videoId?: string;
active: boolean;
}[];
}) {
const router = useRouter();
const stepRefs = useRef<(HTMLLIElement | null)[]>([]);

useEffect(() => {
if (!selectedStep) return;
const stepIndex = selectedStep - 1;
if (stepIndex >= 0 && stepIndex < steps.length) {
stepRefs.current[stepIndex]?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" });
}
}, [selectedStep, steps.length]);

return (
<ul className="space-y-6">
{steps.map((step, stepIdx) => (
<li
key={step.title}
ref={(el) => {
if (el) stepRefs.current[stepIdx] = el;
}}
className="relative flex gap-x-4"
onClick={
!step.active
? () => {
router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${stepIdx + 1}`, {
scroll: false,
});
}
: undefined
}
>
<div
className={cn(
stepIdx === steps.length - 1 ? "h-6" : "-bottom-6",
"absolute left-0 top-0 flex w-6 justify-center",
)}
>
<div className="w-px bg-gray-200" />
</div>

<div className="relative flex h-6 w-6 flex-none items-center justify-center bg-white">
<div className="h-1.5 w-1.5 rounded-full bg-gray-100 ring-1 ring-gray-300" />
</div>

<div
className={cn(
"flex-1 transition-opacity duration-300 ease-in-out",
step.active ? "opacity-100" : "pointer-events-none opacity-20",
)}
>
<div className="flex justify-between gap-4">
<div>
<TypographyH3>{step.title}</TypographyH3>
<SectionDescription>{step.description}</SectionDescription>
</div>

<div className="flex items-center">
{step.videoId && (
<OnboardingModal
title={step.title}
description="Watch a quick demo of the full feature in action."
videoId={step.videoId}
buttonProps={{ variant: "outline" }}
/>
)}
</div>
</div>
<div className="mt-4">{step.content}</div>
</div>
</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider further optimizations and component breakdown

While the Steps component is well-implemented, consider the following optimizations to improve maintainability and performance:

  1. Extract smaller components:

    • Create a Step component for individual step rendering.
    • Create a VideoButton component for the "Watch video" functionality.
  2. Use React's useCallback for memoizing the click handler:

const handleStepClick = useCallback((index: number) => {
  if (!steps[index].active) {
    router.replace(`/onboarding?step=${index + 1}`, { scroll: false });
  }
}, [router, steps]);
  1. Consider using useMemo to memoize the steps array if it's being recalculated on every render:
const memoizedSteps = useMemo(() => steps.map(step => ({
  ...step,
  content: <StepContent step={step} />
})), [steps]);

These optimizations can help improve the component's performance and maintainability as the onboarding flow grows more complex. Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 36-51: Enforce to have the onClick mouse event with the onKeyUp, the onKeyDown, or the onKeyPress keyboard event.

Actions triggered using mouse events should have corresponding keyboard events to account for keyboard-only navigation.

(lint/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents)

Comment on lines 55 to 59
const { data, isLoading, error } = useSWR<RulesExamplesResponse>(
prompt
? `/api/user/rules/examples?rulesPrompt=${encodeURIComponent(prompt)}`
: null,
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use POST request for sending prompt data

Using a GET request with potentially long prompt data in the query parameters can lead to URL length limitations. Consider using a POST request instead:

const { data, isLoading, error } = useSWR<RulesExamplesResponse>(
  prompt ? '/api/user/rules/examples' : null,
  prompt ? (url) => fetch(url, {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({ rulesPrompt: prompt }),
  }).then(res => res.json()) : null
);

Make sure to update the corresponding API route to handle POST requests.

Comment on lines 91 to 101
<Input
type="text"
as="textarea"
rows={5}
name="prompt"
placeholder={`This is where you tell the AI assistant how to handle your emails. For example:

${defaultPrompt}`}
registerProps={register("prompt")}
error={errors.prompt}
/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a dedicated Textarea component for better accessibility

Instead of using the Input component with as="textarea", consider creating a dedicated Textarea component that properly handles multiline input and accessibility attributes. This can improve user experience and accessibility compliance.

Example implementation:

<Textarea
  name="prompt"
  rows={5}
  placeholder={`This is where you tell the AI assistant how to handle your emails. For example:\n\n${defaultPrompt}`}
  {...register("prompt")}
  error={errors.prompt}
/>

Ensure that the Textarea component handles accessibility attributes like aria-invalid and aria-describedby for error states.

Comment on lines 120 to 128
function EmailAssistantTestResults({
isLoading,
error,
data,
}: {
isLoading: boolean;
error?: any;
data?: RulesExamplesResponse;
}) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a more specific type for the error prop

Instead of using any for the error prop type, consider using a more specific type that reflects the expected error structure. This can improve type safety and make error handling more predictable.

For example:

type ApiError = {
  message: string;
  code?: number;
};

function EmailAssistantTestResults({
  isLoading,
  error,
  data,
}: {
  isLoading: boolean;
  error?: ApiError;
  data?: RulesExamplesResponse;
}) {
  // ...
}

Adjust the ApiError type according to the actual error structure returned by your API.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 126-126: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

Comment on lines +158 to +173
function getHref(): string {
if (!user) return "/login?next=/premium";

if (isCurrentPlan) return "#";

if (tier.ctaLink) return tier.ctaLink;

return buildLemonUrl(
attachUserInfo(tier.href[frequency.value], {
id: user.id,
email: user.email!,
name: user.name,
}),
affiliateCode,
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Good refactoring, but consider safer email handling

The introduction of the getHref function is a good refactoring that improves the readability and maintainability of the code. It nicely encapsulates the logic for generating the appropriate URL based on various conditions.

However, there's a potential issue with the non-null assertion on the user's email on line 168. Consider using a safer approach to handle potentially null email values.

Here's a suggested fix:

- email: user.email!,
+ email: user.email ?? '',

This change uses the nullish coalescing operator to provide a fallback empty string if the email is null or undefined, making the code more robust against potential runtime errors.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function getHref(): string {
if (!user) return "/login?next=/premium";
if (isCurrentPlan) return "#";
if (tier.ctaLink) return tier.ctaLink;
return buildLemonUrl(
attachUserInfo(tier.href[frequency.value], {
id: user.id,
email: user.email!,
name: user.name,
}),
affiliateCode,
);
}
function getHref(): string {
if (!user) return "/login?next=/premium";
if (isCurrentPlan) return "#";
if (tier.ctaLink) return tier.ctaLink;
return buildLemonUrl(
attachUserInfo(tier.href[frequency.value], {
id: user.id,
email: user.email ?? '',
name: user.name,
}),
affiliateCode,
);
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 168-168: Forbidden non-null assertion.

(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)

value={option.value}
aria-label={option.label}
aria-describedby={option.description}
className={cn(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the usage of aria-describedby attribute

The aria-describedby attribute should reference the ID of an element that contains the description text, not the description text itself. Currently, option.description is likely a string, which may not work as intended with assistive technologies.

To fix this, assign an ID to the description element and reference that ID in the aria-describedby attribute:

             aria-label={option.label}
-            aria-describedby={option.description}
+            aria-describedby={`description-${option.value}`}
             className={cn(

Then, add the corresponding id to the description <span>:

             <span className="block text-sm text-gray-500 group-data-[checked]:text-slate-700"
+                  id={`description-${option.value}`}
             >
               {option.description}
             </span>

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@elie222 elie222 merged commit f9d184f into main Oct 20, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@elie222 elie222 deleted the onboarding branch October 20, 2024 22:53
This was referenced Oct 22, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant