You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Users may want to distribute work across multiple machines (either with or without heartbeat). In that scenario they would only want to execute a subset of tests on each machine.
This issue proposes adding a --shard=M:N option, where M is the shard number, and N is the total number of shards. Given two machines running the same suite users would invoke synthetics with --shard=1:2 and --shard:2:2 based on hashes of the journey names.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you think this is still needed (a sharding specific strategy) now that we support filtering and tags that can be used to control what’s run? I know it’s not exactly the same, but do they provide enough flexibility for the use case?
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 3:14 AM Paul Bianciardi ***@***.***> wrote:
Do you think this is still needed (a sharding specific strategy) now that
we support filtering and tags that can be used to control what’s run? I
know it’s not exactly the same, but do they provide enough flexibility for
the use case?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#277 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABACY6EXCQ2AARZLQG4WKDUBBUGVANCNFSM443AGIAA>
.
Users may want to distribute work across multiple machines (either with or without heartbeat). In that scenario they would only want to execute a subset of tests on each machine.
This issue proposes adding a
--shard=M:N
option, where M is the shard number, and N is the total number of shards. Given two machines running the same suite users would invoke synthetics with--shard=1:2
and--shard:2:2
based on hashes of the journey names.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: