Rename suites to projects

[andrewvc]

AC:

• Change suites to projects (that's the scope of this issue)

Original issue text below

We currently let users export javascript for both inline scripts and projects via the UI shown below. The ability to format for projects is confusing to some users. This issue kicks off a discussion on how we can improve this.

The more I think about it, the more I think we don't need that feature, for script users they can add their own wrapping journey statements, but I want to leave this issue up as a placeholder.

[kyungeunni]

script users they can add their own wrapping journey statements

I agree! Although, if it's the very first time the user creates the synthetics code, it's probably not so obvious how they need to organize the test file(including file name). In this case, we can add a help text or a link to the documentation so users know what to do.

If we decide to keep this feature, however, we should:

1. remove the term suite and come up with a better term(probably project? but users would need more context what is project).
2. make it obvious what is the difference between these two options.

[paulb-elastic]

Yeah, I wonder, if we remove this option, will a user just copy the code into their project folder, and wonder why it doesn't work?

I guess the problem here is that even with the current suite (should change this to project) export option, this still won't work if trying to push because there are new mandatory fields needed (such as location).

Maybe we should actually enhance the project export option to include these (even if it sets the location to "set-your-location-here", so there's a placeholder they know they need to edit.

[paulb-elastic]

To focus on MMFS, change suites to projects (that's the scope of this issue)

[shahzad31]

@paulb-elastic should this be pushed to 8.4?

[andrewvc]

I agree with @paulb-elastic and have updated the top comment. All we're going to do here is rename suites to projects

[justinkambic]

Checked this against recent main version of recorder, there is no mention of suite in copy or code. Post-FF testing LGTM