Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add code to expose datasource configs in API #216

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 18, 2020

Conversation

ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

@ruflin ruflin commented Feb 18, 2020

In #212 the datasource structure was introduced in the manifests but not exposed through the APIs yet. This PR changes this exposing all the fields. So far it only exposes the fields and no validation is done yet. This needs to be added in the future.

A test package was added to see the output of datasource configs and potential changes to it.

In elastic#212 the datasource structure was introduced in the manifests but not exposed through the APIs yet. This PR changes this exposing all the fields. So far it only exposes the fields and no validation is done yet. This needs to be added in the future.

A test package was added to see the output of datasource configs and potential changes to it.
@ruflin ruflin self-assigned this Feb 18, 2020
@ruflin ruflin requested a review from jfsiii February 18, 2020 13:17
Copy link

@jfsiii jfsiii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll need to update the types in Kibana but this LGTM

@ruflin ruflin merged commit 2caf2d7 into elastic:master Feb 18, 2020
@ruflin ruflin deleted the expose-datasources branch February 18, 2020 13:55
@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ruflin commented Feb 18, 2020

@jfsiii I assume shipping this will not break the Kibana code but we miss the info. Could you take care of updating the types on the Kibana end?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants