Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Remove special case handling for missing target field for classification #1036

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2020

Conversation

tveasey
Copy link
Contributor

@tveasey tveasey commented Mar 4, 2020

Following on from #1034, we can simplify the handling of missing target field values for classification. Java will supply the missing string value to denote these are missing rather than the empty string.

Copy link
Contributor

@droberts195 droberts195 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Just be careful about the merge timing. Wait until a few minutes after the Java change has successfully completed an intake build, not just until the Java change is merged.

@tveasey
Copy link
Contributor Author

tveasey commented Mar 5, 2020

retest

@droberts195
Copy link
Contributor

Just be careful about the merge timing. Wait until a few minutes after the Java change has successfully completed an intake build, not just until the Java change is merged.

The Java change passed an intake build: https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+master+git+push/3204/

So this PR is safe to merge now.

@tveasey tveasey merged commit 5102588 into elastic:master Mar 6, 2020
@tveasey tveasey deleted the remove-empty-is-missing branch March 6, 2020 11:29
tveasey added a commit to tveasey/ml-cpp-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants