-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be consistent with how we handle configuration options #5117
Comments
I fully agree with Pere. In case of a redis input, you even have to use a second input if you want to use a different port. Using the way it is done on the output would solve this problem (host => 127.0.0.1:6379 instead of host => 127.0.0.1 port => 6379) |
Good additions, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:09 PM Colin Surprenant [email protected]
|
👍 |
@purbon I pointed out #2151 because it also identifies options inconsistencies related to ssl, so you can add that to your: I pointed out #3773 because you suggested to: |
After rereading the links from @colinsurprenant - I see we spoke about Java config declarations. I recently did some preliminary work on feasibility of a pure Java plugin + JRuby wrapper - I discovered Typesafe/Lightbend config java lib - this issue shows more, config lib readme |
This issue is open to propose a unification process toward the way we handle certain options in plugins, I'm going to focus for now only on host and port options, but I'm sure there are a few others that might benefit from it.
In the case of host connection management, we got different behaviour:
this is an small subset of plugins, just trying to show the situation
This give user a contradictory experience as most of people expect to have similar behaviour across logstash plugins, the proposal here is to:
What do you think?
Related to: logstash-plugins/logstash-input-redis#24 logstash-plugins/logstash-input-redis#25
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: