-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Lens] Rename operations to map exposed names for Formula #94710
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
339e002
:truck: Rename operations to map exposed names
dej611 f1bc7c0
:sparkles: Add migration for ops renaming
dej611 afca41d
:white_mark_check: Add migration for savedObjects
dej611 2097bde
:bug: Fix more tests for the rename
dej611 6c62415
:bug: Fix for operation rename
dej611 cc43138
:white_check_mark: Fix functional tests for rename
dej611 caf55e3
:white_check_mark: Fixing last tests
dej611 4277703
:bug: Missing test fixed
dej611 c4fb048
Merge branch 'master' into fix/94150
kibanamachine 94d8fd2
Merge branch 'master' into fix/94150
kibanamachine f6ae901
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix/94150
dej611 2fbde05
:ok_hand: Reuse constant name
dej611 1e1fc4b
:bug: Map aggregation names to new ones for restrictions
dej611 f0e1aa3
Merge branch 'fix/94150' of github.com:dej611/kibana into fix/94150
dej611 0ceec81
:bug: Fix expression issue
dej611 dd4d5fa
:ok_hand: remove derivative mapping
dej611 5c51dd4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix/94150
dej611 29332a1
:label: Fix test type issue
dej611 b298e4d
Merge branch 'master' into fix/94150
kibanamachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Our derivative/differences implementation is not based on the Elasticsearch aggregation, it shouldn't show up here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about it, but wanted to create a generic function for the renaming. Do you think this may lead to issues?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm more concerned about this being confusing - Elasticsearch derivative and Lens differences do not share anything, so it doesn't make sense to map one to the other.