-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SIEM] Fix and consolidate handling of error responses in the client #59438
Conversation
Throwing a TypeError meant that our manual errors were indistinguishable from, say, trying to invoke a method on undefined. This adds a custom error, BadRequestError, that disambiguates that situation.
With Core's new HTTP client, an unsuccessful API call will raise an error containing the body of the response it received. In the case of SIEM endpoints, this will include a useful error message with potentially more specificity than e.g. 'Internal Server Error'. This adds a type predicate to check for such errors, and adds a handling case in our errorToToaster handler. If the error does not contain our SIEM-specific message, it will fall through as normal and the general error.message will be displayed in the toaster.
The new HTTP client raises an error on a 4xx or 5xx response, so there should not be a case where throwIfNotOk is actually going to throw an error. The established pattern on the frontend is to catch errors at the call site and handle them appropriately, so I'm mainly just verifying that these are caught where they're used, now.
These were living in ML since that's where they originated. However, we have need of it (and already use it) elsewhere. The basic pattern for error handling on the frontend is: 1) API call throws error 2) caller catches error and dispatches a toast throwIfNotOk is meant to convert the error into a useful message in 1). We currently use both errorToToaster and displayErrorToast to display that in a toaster in 2) Now that errorToToaster handles a few different types of errors, and throwIfNotOk is going to be bypassed due to the new client behavior of throwing on error, we're going to start consolidating on: 1) Api call throws error 2) caller catches error and passes it to errorToToaster
* Ensures that all callers of these methods properly catch errors * Updates error toasterification to use errorToToaster * Simplifies tests now that we mainly just invoke the http client and return the result. throwIfNotOk is not being used in the majority of cases, as the client raises an error and bypasses that call. The few cases this might break are where we return a 200 but have errors within the response. Whether throwIfNotOk handled this or not, I'll need a simpler helper to accomplish the same behavior.
These can be an array of errors OR rules; typing it as such forces downstream to deal with both. enableRules was being handled correctly with the bucketing helper, and TS has confirmed the rest are as well. This obviates the need to raise from our API calls, as bulk errors are recoverable and we want to both a) continue on with any successful rules and b) handle the errors as necessary. This is highly dependent on the caller and so we can't/shouldn't handle it here.
I'm not sure that we're ever using this non-dispatch version, but it was throwing a type error. Will bring it up in review.
These are unneeded as an error response will already throw an error to be handled at the call site.
This was left over as a result of elastic#56261
Again, not needed because the client already throws.
* Gets rid of throwIfNotOK usage * uses core http fetch
This served the same purpose as errorToToaster, but in a less robust way. All usages have been replaced, so now we say goodbye.
…redicate There was no functional difference between these two code paths, and removing these custom errors allowed us to delete a bunch of associated code as well..
These were mainly related to my swapping any remaining fetch calls with the core router as good kibana denizens should :salute:
Pinging @elastic/siem (Team:SIEM) |
@@ -62,13 +64,29 @@ export const RuleSwitchComponent = ({ | |||
await enableRulesAction([id], event.target.checked!, dispatch, dispatchToaster); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the normal path that catches/toasters the error properly. the else
clause below is handling a case where we don't have dispatch. @XavierM is the dispatchless branch for portability, or do we have a specific use case for it right now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After discussing with @XavierM, it looks like the else
path here is used on the rule details page. We should consolidate these, but they're both currently used.
This is enough to get our tests to pass. We can't use the core mocks for now since there are circular dependencies there, which breaks our build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Detection engine changes look good. Did some testing locally and everything seemed good to go.
When possible. Also adds missing error-throwing documentation where necessary.
x-pack/legacy/plugins/siem/public/components/news_feed/index.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This reverts commit 6421322.
x-pack/legacy/plugins/siem/public/components/toasters/errors.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
export const displaySuccessToast = ( | ||
title: string, | ||
dispatchToaster: React.Dispatch<ActionToaster> | ||
): void => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 on typing the return types. Really appreciate it.
slice: jest.fn(), | ||
stream: jest.fn(), | ||
text: jest.fn(), | ||
} as Blob; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This as Blob
looks redundant since it is already declared above?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used this and it was ok:
const blob: Blob = {
size: 89,
type: 'json',
slice: jest.fn(),
};
await fetchQuerySignals({ query: mockSignalsQuery, signal: abortCtrl.signal }); | ||
expect(fetchMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/api/detection_engine/signals/search', { | ||
body: | ||
'{"aggs":{"signalsByGrouping":{"terms":{"field":"signal.rule.risk_score","missing":"All others","order":{"_count":"desc"},"size":10},"aggs":{"signals":{"date_histogram":{"field":"@timestamp","fixed_interval":"81000000ms","min_doc_count":0,"extended_bounds":{"min":1579644343954,"max":1582236343955}}}}}},"query":{"bool":{"filter":[{"bool":{"must":[],"filter":[{"match_all":{}}],"should":[],"must_not":[]}},{"range":{"@timestamp":{"gte":1579644343954,"lte":1582236343955}}}]}}}', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These would be better as:
body: JSON.stringify({ aggs: ... }
Rather than string dumps for future maintainers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very true; these mainly came over from my cherry-pick of X's branch, and I simplified them since they're no longer dealing with the try/catch logic. I think we'd find that this test is pretty much the same as the one below it, and that this argument is in fact { body: JSON.stringify(mockSignalsQuery) }
😉
x-pack/legacy/plugins/siem/public/pages/detection_engine/rules/components/rule_switch/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for all the work on this.
Appreciate the BadRequest vs. TypeError.
Uses has to properly inspect our errorish object. Turns out we have a 'message' property, not an 'error' property.
We need a message (via new Error), a body.message, and a body.status_code to satisfy isApiError.
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
💚 Build SucceededHistory
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
…59438) (#59757) * Convert our manual throwing of TypeError to a custom Error Throwing a TypeError meant that our manual errors were indistinguishable from, say, trying to invoke a method on undefined. This adds a custom error, BadRequestError, that disambiguates that situation. * Present API Error messages to the user With Core's new HTTP client, an unsuccessful API call will raise an error containing the body of the response it received. In the case of SIEM endpoints, this will include a useful error message with potentially more specificity than e.g. 'Internal Server Error'. This adds a type predicate to check for such errors, and adds a handling case in our errorToToaster handler. If the error does not contain our SIEM-specific message, it will fall through as normal and the general error.message will be displayed in the toaster. * Remove unnecessary use of throwIfNotOk in our client API calls The new HTTP client raises an error on a 4xx or 5xx response, so there should not be a case where throwIfNotOk is actually going to throw an error. The established pattern on the frontend is to catch errors at the call site and handle them appropriately, so I'm mainly just verifying that these are caught where they're used, now. * Move errorToToaster and ToasterError to general location These were living in ML since that's where they originated. However, we have need of it (and already use it) elsewhere. The basic pattern for error handling on the frontend is: 1) API call throws error 2) caller catches error and dispatches a toast throwIfNotOk is meant to convert the error into a useful message in 1). We currently use both errorToToaster and displayErrorToast to display that in a toaster in 2) Now that errorToToaster handles a few different types of errors, and throwIfNotOk is going to be bypassed due to the new client behavior of throwing on error, we're going to start consolidating on: 1) Api call throws error 2) caller catches error and passes it to errorToToaster * Refactor Rules API functions to not use throwIfNotOk * Ensures that all callers of these methods properly catch errors * Updates error toasterification to use errorToToaster * Simplifies tests now that we mainly just invoke the http client and return the result. throwIfNotOk is not being used in the majority of cases, as the client raises an error and bypasses that call. The few cases this might break are where we return a 200 but have errors within the response. Whether throwIfNotOk handled this or not, I'll need a simpler helper to accomplish the same behavior. * Define a type for our BulkRule responses These can be an array of errors OR rules; typing it as such forces downstream to deal with both. enableRules was being handled correctly with the bucketing helper, and TS has confirmed the rest are as well. This obviates the need to raise from our API calls, as bulk errors are recoverable and we want to both a) continue on with any successful rules and b) handle the errors as necessary. This is highly dependent on the caller and so we can't/shouldn't handle it here. * Address case where bulk rules errors were not handled I'm not sure that we're ever using this non-dispatch version, but it was throwing a type error. Will bring it up in review. * Remove more throwIfNotOk uses from API calls These are unneeded as an error response will already throw an error to be handled at the call site. * Display an error toaster on newsfeed fetch failure * Remove dead code This was left over as a result of #56261 * Remove throwIfNotOk from case API calls Again, not needed because the client already throws. * Update use_get_tags for NP * Gets rid of throwIfNotOK usage * uses core http fetch * Remove throwIfNotOk from signals API * Remove throwIfNotOk This served the same purpose as errorToToaster, but in a less robust way. All usages have been replaced, so now we say goodbye. * Remove custom errors in favor of KibanaApiError and isApiError type predicate There was no functional difference between these two code paths, and removing these custom errors allowed us to delete a bunch of associated code as well.. * Fix test failures These were mainly related to my swapping any remaining fetch calls with the core router as good kibana denizens should :salute: * Replace use of core mocks with our simpler local ones This is enough to get our tests to pass. We can't use the core mocks for now since there are circular dependencies there, which breaks our build. * add signal api unit tests * privilege unit test api * Add unit tests on the signals container * Refactor signals API tests to use core mocks * Simplifies our mocking verbosity by leveraging core mocks * Simplifies test setup by isolating a reference to our fetch mock * Abstracts response structure to pure helper functions The try/catch tests had some false positives in that nothing would be asserted if the code did not throw an error. These proved to be masking a gap in coverage for our get/create signal index requests, which do not leverage `throwIfNotOk` but instead rely on the fetch to throw an error; once that behavior is verified we can update those tests to have our fetchMock throw errors, and we should be all set. * Simplify signals API tests now that the subjects do less We no longer re-throw errors, or parse the response, we just return the result of the client call. Simple! * Simplify API functions to use implict returns When possible. Also adds missing error-throwing documentation where necessary. * Revert "Display an error toaster on newsfeed fetch failure" This reverts commit 6421322. * Error property is readonly * Pull uuid generation into default argument value * Fix type predicate isApiError Uses has to properly inspect our errorish object. Turns out we have a 'message' property, not an 'error' property. * Fix test setup following modification of type predicate We need a message (via new Error), a body.message, and a body.status_code to satisfy isApiError. Co-authored-by: Xavier Mouligneau <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Xavier Mouligneau <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
* master: Add a retry to dashboard test for a sometimes slow async operation (elastic#59600) [Endpoint] Sample data generator for endpoint app (elastic#58936) [Vis Editor] Refactoring metrics axes (elastic#59135) [DOCS] Changed Discover app to Discover (elastic#59769) [Metrics Alerts] Add support for search query and groupBy on alerts (elastic#59388) Enhancement - EUICodeEditor for Visualize JSON (elastic#58679) [ML] Transforms: Data grid fixes. (elastic#59538) [SIEM] Fix and consolidate handling of error responses in the client (elastic#59438) [Maps] convert tooltip classes to typescript (elastic#59589) [ML] Functional tests - re-activate date_nanos test (elastic#59649) Move canvas to use NP Expressions service (elastic#58387) Update misc dependencies (elastic#59542) [Unit Testing] Configure react-testing-library queries to use Kibana's data-test-subj instead of default data-testid (elastic#59445) [Console] Remove unused code (elastic#59554) [Logs / Metrics UI] Link handling / stop page reloads (elastic#58478) Add SavedObject management section registration in core (elastic#59291)
Summary
As a followup to #58292 and our consolidation to
status_code
in error responses on the backend, this is a similar consolidation for the frontend. It was driven by the realization that our custom error messages were being lost in our client's handling of these error responses, and was an attempt to fix it.After some further investigation, the most prevalent pattern for error response handling is:
throwIfNotOk
, and the default behavior of the new HTTP clienterrorToToaster
to display an error toaster with a contextual title and messaging from the Error itself.This chore performs the follow tasks:
KibanaApiError
representing our current/future error responseerrorToToaster
to properly transfer our custom error messages to the toaster messageerrorToToaster
to a more central location (rather than deep inside of ml/)throwIfNotOk
) within our API functionsthrowIfNotOk
and our custom endpoint-specific Error classes as they were redundant with the above.This branch changes the following behavior:
I had the following notes as followup to the above work:
errorToToaster
errorToToaster
(already had a TODO)Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.
For maintainers