-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine #198195
Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine #198195
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/security-detection-engine (Team:Detection Engine) |
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
…y-detection-engine
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
History
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Starting backport for target branches: 8.x https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/11738807412 |
💔 All backports failed
Manual backportTo create the backport manually run:
Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
…ction-engine (elastic#198195) ### Authz API migration for authorized routes This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to new security configuration. Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization) ### **Before migration:** Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', options: { tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'], }, ... }, handler); ``` ### **After migration:** Tags have been replaced with the more robust `security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', security: { authz: { requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'], }, }, ... }, handler); ``` ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security configuration: - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags. - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition. - If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]>
…ction-engine (elastic#198195) ### Authz API migration for authorized routes This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to new security configuration. Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization) ### **Before migration:** Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', options: { tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'], }, ... }, handler); ``` ### **After migration:** Tags have been replaced with the more robust `security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', security: { authz: { requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'], }, }, ... }, handler); ``` ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security configuration: - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags. - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition. - If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]>
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
1 similar comment
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
…ction-engine (elastic#198195) ### Authz API migration for authorized routes This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to new security configuration. Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization) ### **Before migration:** Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', options: { tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'], }, ... }, handler); ``` ### **After migration:** Tags have been replaced with the more robust `security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`: ```ts router.get({ path: '/api/path', security: { authz: { requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'], }, }, ... }, handler); ``` ### What to do next? 1. Review the changes in this PR. 2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security configuration: - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags. - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition. - If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges. ## Any questions? If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team. --------- Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 32f0396) # Conflicts: # x-pack/test/security_solution_api_integration/test_suites/detections_response/detection_engine/rule_execution_logic/indicator_match/trial_license_complete_tier/indicator_match_alert_suppression.ts
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
4 similar comments
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
…y-detection-engine (#198195) (#199752) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`: - [Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine (#198195)](#198195) <!--- Backport version: 8.9.8 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Kibana Machine","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-11-08T08:39:05Z","message":"Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine (#198195)\n\n### Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n### **Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]>","sha":"32f0396b277f255ca3465de4f1a8fcf11bbddfb3","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.17.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["enhancement","release_note:skip","Feature:Security/Authorization","backport missing","v9.0.0","backport:prev-minor","Team:Detection Engine","Authz: API migration"],"number":198195,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/198195","mergeCommit":{"message":"Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine (#198195)\n\n### Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n### **Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]>","sha":"32f0396b277f255ca3465de4f1a8fcf11bbddfb3"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","labelRegex":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/198195","number":198195,"mergeCommit":{"message":"Authorized route migration for routes owned by @elastic/security-detection-engine (#198195)\n\n### Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n### **Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path: '/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n}, handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>\r\nCo-authored-by: Nikita Khristinin <[email protected]>","sha":"32f0396b277f255ca3465de4f1a8fcf11bbddfb3"}}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
Authz API migration for authorized routes
This PR migrates
access:<privilege>
tags used in route definitions to new security configuration.Please refer to the documentation for more information: Authorization API
Before migration:
Access control tags were defined in the
options
object of the route:After migration:
Tags have been replaced with the more robust
security.authz.requiredPrivileges
field undersecurity
:What to do next?
access
tags.Any questions?
If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please reach out to the
@elastic/kibana-security
team.