-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SecuritySolution] Fix flaky timeline template creation tests #173206
Merged
janmonschke
merged 9 commits into
elastic:main
from
janmonschke:security/fix-flaky-timeline-template-creation-tests
Dec 14, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c14d94f
you cannot pin events in templates
janmonschke 6515df5
fix flaky timeline template tests
janmonschke 6b314df
flaky test runner config
janmonschke f27ba63
revert flaky test runner changes
janmonschke 2f23f20
remove unnecessary `createTimeline`
janmonschke da5e697
Add logs
janmonschke dc8ec9d
Merge branch 'main' into security/fix-flaky-timeline-template-creatio…
janmonschke c7c270d
remove comment
janmonschke 1048030
Merge branch 'main' into security/fix-flaky-timeline-template-creatio…
kibanamachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get the purpose of this test to kind of test the majority of the timeline template functionality, but do you think it's worth breaking this apart to
or something similarly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather test this in one test so that we don't create dependencies between tests or duplicate a lot of the creation code.
To make more sense of the logic and in order to make it easier to debug on the CI, I added a couple of
cy.log
s. Let me know if that's better. da5e697There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense and I understand why. In this scenario I would have suggested putting the creation in a
beforeAll
and then still breaking the tests apart, but with cypress not running thebeforeAll
on retries could make those flaky and not make true independent tests. All that being said, this may be the best compromise.