-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Cases] Custom fields feature fix tests #167472
[Cases] Custom fields feature fix tests #167472
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/response-ops (Team:ResponseOps) |
Pinging @elastic/response-ops-cases (Feature:Cases) |
…js-jankisalvi/kibana into custom-fields-feature-fix-tests
x-pack/test/cases_api_integration/spaces_only/tests/common/cases/patch_cases.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
…js-jankisalvi/kibana into custom-fields-feature-fix-tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, Janki for working on this. I left some comments.
@@ -495,31 +495,11 @@ describe('create', () => { | |||
); | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('should not throw an error and fill out missing customFields when they are undefined', async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should keep this test and the new test you added ("should throw an error when required `customFields are undefined"). For this test, we need to make all fields in the configuration optional.
if (customFieldsConfiguration === undefined) { | ||
throw Boom.badRequest('No custom fields configured.'); | ||
if (!Array.isArray(requestCustomFields) || !requestCustomFields.length) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am a bit confused about this change. What scenario are we trying to cover?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is strange, this doesn't seem to be my change 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems that @adcoelho tried to fix some tests in f10dd1b
(#167472)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that if there is no configuration or no custom fields we should return. The function validates only required custom fields so no configuration means no custom fields are required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We discussed offline and we decided to leave it as it is.
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => { | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
it('should resolve a case with no comments', async () => { | |||
const postedCase = await createCase(supertest, getPostCaseRequest()); | |||
const postedCase = await createCase(supertest, postCaseReq); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume that because the getPostCaseRequest()
has customFields
failed. I think we should getPostCaseRequest
and not add the customFields
in getPostCaseRequest
. See my previous comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually here I am not sure what was wrong because the test passed in local and failed in pipeline
…-ref HEAD~1..HEAD --fix'
…js-jankisalvi/kibana into custom-fields-feature-fix-tests
💔 Build FailedFailed CI Steps
Test Failures
Metrics [docs]Saved Objects .kibana field count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
60cdab5
into
elastic:cases-custom-fields-feature-branch
## Summary This PR implements an MPV for custom fields in Cases. Specifically: - Users can add, delete, or edit custom fields from the configuration page - Users can set custom fields when creating a case - Users can set custom fields when editing a case - Only the `Text` custom field type is supported. The `Toggle` is implemented to test the framework. - Users with a basic license can enter the configuration page and set custom fields - The configuration page header changed to "Settings" - The "Edit external connection" button changed to "Settings" - APIs: - Users cannot post custom fields with duplicate keys - Users cannot change the type of the custom field - Users cannot add custom fields that are not configured - Required fields should be present - If some of the custom fields are omitted from the request the backend will fill them with `null` values - Limits: - Maximum 10 custom fields configured - Maximum 50 chars in custom field labels - Maximum 160 chars for the value of the `Text` custom field type - Users cannot change the type of a custom field - The key of the custom fields should contain only lowercase letters (a-z), numbers (0-9), '_', and '-' - Required fields needs a value ## Testing - Cases created before custom fields are working as expected (create some on `main` before switching to the feature branch) - Environments without configuration are working as expected (clear ES data) - Environments with existing configurations are working as expected - Try to create cases with custom fields (required & optional) and delete some of them - Try to create cases with custom fields (required & optional) and then configure new custom fields. Existing cases with old custom fields should work as expected - User actions are working as expected especially with the combinations described in the previous two bullets - Users with a basic license can configure custom fields but cannot configure connectors - Users with a gold+ license can configure custom fields and connectors - Users with read access cannot configure or edit custom fields Resolves: #160236 PRs: - #165671 - #166353 - #166439 - #166483 - #166815 - #166940 - #166962 - #166969 - #166975 - #167029 - #167047 - #167105 - #167131 - #167144 - #167166 - #167167 - #167310 - #167386 - #167481 - #167495 - #167398 - #167472 ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [x] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [x] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### For maintainers - [x] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) ## Release notes Allow users to configure custom fields in Cases. Supported field types: Text. Coming soon: Multi-text, List, Number, Toggle, Date, IP, Email, etc. --------- Co-authored-by: adcoelho <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christos Nasikas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julian Gernun <[email protected]>
Summary
Connected to #160236
This PR fixes tests for custom field mvp feature
Checklist