Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance runner in js #146129

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022
Merged

Performance runner in js #146129

merged 20 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022

Conversation

lizozom
Copy link
Contributor

@lizozom lizozom commented Nov 23, 2022

Summary

Rewrite the performance journey runner using TypeScript, to avoid dangling ES\node processes during test execution.

Results are stable with this runner, as verified on CI

image

@lizozom lizozom force-pushed the performance-runner-in-js branch from 3fc5174 to cae3d71 Compare November 23, 2022 11:15
@lizozom lizozom marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2022 11:18
@lizozom lizozom requested a review from a team as a code owner November 23, 2022 11:18
@lizozom lizozom added wg:performance Work tracked by the performance workgroup Team:Performance v8.7.0 release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes labels Nov 23, 2022
@spalger
Copy link
Contributor

spalger commented Nov 23, 2022

You might want to try pushing this branch to the elastic/kibana repo and trying a couple executions of the performance job before merging

@lizozom
Copy link
Contributor Author

lizozom commented Nov 23, 2022

@spalger, already running on the debug pipeline.
I will wait for 24 hours of data before merging.

@lizozom
Copy link
Contributor Author

lizozom commented Nov 29, 2022

@spalger figures that the worker was to blame for the instability.
This PR is perfectly stable on our ubuntu agent.
We'll investigate the issues with the other worker separately.
I think we should be good to go to merge.

@lizozom lizozom requested a review from spalger November 29, 2022 10:33
@lizozom lizozom requested a review from dmlemeshko November 29, 2022 11:04
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Unknown metric groups

ESLint disabled in files

id before after diff
osquery 1 2 +1

ESLint disabled line counts

id before after diff
enterpriseSearch 19 21 +2
fleet 59 65 +6
osquery 109 115 +6
securitySolution 442 448 +6
total +20

Total ESLint disabled count

id before after diff
enterpriseSearch 20 22 +2
fleet 68 74 +6
osquery 110 117 +7
securitySolution 519 525 +6
total +21

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@lizozom lizozom linked an issue Nov 29, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
Comment on lines +86 to +91
for (const journey of journeys) {
await startEs();
await runWarmup(journey);
await runTest(journey);
await procRunner.stop('es');
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do I understand the flow correctly: if runWarmup throws exception for journey 2 (assuming we run 5 total) execution will be stopped with journey 3-5 not run and ES not stopped?

I think currently we do run all the journeys, even if 1 fails (we collect run statuses)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right!
Could we merge this one and update in a follow up?
I have multiple additional PRs depending on this one :-)

@lizozom
Copy link
Contributor Author

lizozom commented Nov 29, 2022

@dmlemeshko why don't you try re-writing the scalability runner in a similar way and then we can check if the behavior of the worker was related to zombie processes?

@lizozom lizozom merged commit 783ea14 into elastic:main Nov 29, 2022
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport:skip This commit does not require backporting label Nov 29, 2022
lizozom pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
## Summary

Follow up to #146129
See
[comment](#146129 (comment))
for more details.

### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing
guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses
sentence case text and includes [i18n
support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ]
[Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html)
was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more
about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/))
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures
(run axe in browser:
[FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/),
[Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US))
- [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be
allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker
list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)
- [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive
layout. (You can test this [in your
browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server))
- [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)


### Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to
identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature
release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples
and how they may potentially impact the change:

| Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes |

|---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------|
| Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space.
| Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still
supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between
spaces. |
| Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions
when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low
| Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result
in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we
add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing
procedure. |
| Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are
disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag
or plugin combination still results in our service operational. |
| [See more potential risk
examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) |


### For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
dmlemeshko added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
## Summary

This PR is the follow-up to #147002 and #146129 and makes few changes to
make both performance scripts expose very similar cli and allow run
`run_performance` locally for debug purpose.

- to run a single test locally against source:
  - single user journey: 
`node scripts/run_performance.js --journey-path
x-pack/performance/journeys/login.ts`
  -  scalability journey (auto-generated):
`node scripts/run_scalability.js --journey-path
target/scalability_traces/kibana/login-0184f19e-0903-450d-884d-436d737a3abe.json`

`skip-warmup` flag to avoid journey warmup runs for performance data set
extraction (we don't need to run journey twice while interested in APM
traces only)

PR also updates pipeline scripts with new changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Performance v8.7.0 wg:performance Work tracked by the performance workgroup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create a TypeScript runner for performance tests
5 participants