-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance runner in js #146129
Performance runner in js #146129
Conversation
3fc5174
to
cae3d71
Compare
You might want to try pushing this branch to the elastic/kibana repo and trying a couple executions of the performance job before merging |
Co-authored-by: Spencer <[email protected]>
@spalger, already running on the |
…into performance-runner-in-js
…into performance-runner-in-js
…ance-runner-in-js
@spalger figures that the worker was to blame for the instability. |
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Unknown metric groupsESLint disabled in files
ESLint disabled line counts
Total ESLint disabled count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
for (const journey of journeys) { | ||
await startEs(); | ||
await runWarmup(journey); | ||
await runTest(journey); | ||
await procRunner.stop('es'); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do I understand the flow correctly: if runWarmup
throws exception for journey 2 (assuming we run 5 total) execution will be stopped with journey 3-5 not run and ES not stopped?
I think currently we do run all the journeys, even if 1 fails (we collect run statuses)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right!
Could we merge this one and update in a follow up?
I have multiple additional PRs depending on this one :-)
@dmlemeshko why don't you try re-writing the scalability runner in a similar way and then we can check if the behavior of the worker was related to zombie processes? |
## Summary Follow up to #146129 See [comment](#146129 (comment)) for more details. ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [ ] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/)) - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures (run axe in browser: [FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/), [Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US)) - [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker) - [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive layout. (You can test this [in your browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server)) - [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers) ### Risk Matrix Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR. Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release. When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change: | Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes | |---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------| | Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. | Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces. | | Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low | Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure. | | Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational. | | [See more potential risk examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) | ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
## Summary This PR is the follow-up to #147002 and #146129 and makes few changes to make both performance scripts expose very similar cli and allow run `run_performance` locally for debug purpose. - to run a single test locally against source: - single user journey: `node scripts/run_performance.js --journey-path x-pack/performance/journeys/login.ts` - scalability journey (auto-generated): `node scripts/run_scalability.js --journey-path target/scalability_traces/kibana/login-0184f19e-0903-450d-884d-436d737a3abe.json` `skip-warmup` flag to avoid journey warmup runs for performance data set extraction (we don't need to run journey twice while interested in APM traces only) PR also updates pipeline scripts with new changes
Summary
Rewrite the performance journey runner using TypeScript, to avoid dangling ES\node processes during test execution.
Results are stable with this runner, as verified on CI