Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unified search - iindex_pattern => data view type improvement #129506
unified search - iindex_pattern => data view type improvement #129506
Changes from 1 commit
2030add
28b0909
e594b32
cd25d9e
1e6e170
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this pretty risky? If the
QueryStringInput
requires a fullDataView
instance from now on, is there a way to provide one without all the overhead of persisting it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dataViews.create
will create an instance without persisting.We're working to remove all instances of faked data view instances. Is this happening in the infra code? Perhaps a new issue needs to be created to address this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that derived data view is "fake". But if data views can now be created without persistence we can replace that. But let's do that separately 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is ok as far as the prop
indexPatterns
exposed bySearchBar
is the same typeDataView
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/129506/files#diff-c82e1b8d881f115132594175097c24185f00063c492eb44af979776de2218f53R42
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fkanout Its the responsibility of the owners of
x-pack/plugins/observability
to determine this is okay or to explain why its not. If its not okay we can review options to resolve the issue or leave this alone for now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@XavierM, it would be helpful to get your inputs here, please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's merge this one as the
DataView
type is used in both places. Later on, If the type needs to be changed, it will be handled in a different PR.