Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.14] [Security Solutions][Detection Engine] Adds ability to ignore fields during alert indexing and a workaround for an EQL bug (#110927) #111174

Merged

Conversation

FrankHassanabad
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 7.14:

…during alert indexing and a workaround for an EQL bug (elastic#110927)

## Summary

Adds a workaround for EQL bug: elastic/elasticsearch#77152
Adds the safety feature mentioned here: elastic#110802

Adds the ability to ignore particular [fields](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-fields.html#search-fields-param) when the field is merged with [_source](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-fields.html#source-filtering). Also fixes an EQL bug where EQL is introducing the meta field of `_ignored` within the fields and causing documents to not be indexable when we merge with the fields from EQL.

Alerting document creation uses the fields API to get [runtime field](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/runtime.html),  [constant keyword](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/keyword.html#constant-keyword-field-type), etc... that are only available within the [fields API](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-fields.html#search-fields-param) and then merges the field values not found within the `_source` document with the `_source` document and then finally indexes this merged document as an alert document.

This fix/ability is a "safety feature" in that if a problematic [runtime field](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/runtime.html), [constant keyword](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/keyword.html#constant-keyword-field-type) is discovered or another bug along the stack we can set a `kibana.yml` key/value pair to ignore the problematic field.

This _WILL NOT_ remove problematic fields from the `_source` document. This will only ignore problematic constant keyword, runtime fields, aliases, or anything else found in the fields API that is causing merge issues.

This PR:
  * Adds a `alertIgnoreFields` `kibana.yml` array key with a default of an empty array if not specified.
  * Plumbs the `alertIgnoreFields` through the stack and into the fields/_source merge strategies of `missingFields` and `allFields`
  * Adds a temporary `isEqlBug77152` where it hard codes an ignore of `_ignored` until the EQL problem is fixed and then we will remove the workaround
  * Adds unit tests
  * Adds e2e tests which covers the described use cases above.

The `alertIgnoreFields` key/value within `kibana.yml` if set should be an array of strings of each field you want to ignore. This can also contain regular expressions as long as they are of the form, `"/regex/"` in the array.

Example if you want to ignore fields that are problematic called "host.name" and then one in which you want to ignore all fields that start with "user." using a regular expression:

```yml
xpack.securitySolution.alertIgnoreFields: ['host.name', '/user\..*/']
```

Although there are e2e tests which exercise the use cases...

If you want to manual test the EQL bug fix you would add these documents in dev tools:

```json
# Delete and add a mapping with a small ignore_above.
DELETE eql-issue-ignore-fields-delme
PUT eql-issue-ignore-fields-delme
{
  "mappings" : {
    "dynamic": "strict",
    "properties" : {
      "@timestamp": {
        "type": "date"
      },
      "some_keyword" : {
        "ignore_above": 5,
        "type" : "keyword"
      },
      "other_keyword" : {
        "ignore_above": 10,
        "type" : "keyword"
      }
    }
  }
}

# Add a single document with one field that will be truncated and a second that will not.
PUT eql-issue-ignore-fields-delme/_doc/1
{
  "@timestamp": "2021-09-02T04:13:05.626Z",
  "some_keyword": "longer than normal",
  "other_keyword": "normal"
}
```

Then create an alert which queries everything from it:
<img width="1155" alt="Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 10 15 06 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1151048/131781042-faa424cf-65a5-4ebb-b801-3f188940c81d.png">

and ensure signals are created:
<img width="2214" alt="Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 10 30 18 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1151048/131782069-b9ab959c-f22d-44d5-baf0-561fe349c037.png">

To test the manual exclusions of any other problematic fields, create any index which has runtime fields or `constant keywords` but does not have anything within the `_source` document using dev tools. For example you can use `constant keyword` like so

```json
PUT constant-keywords-deleme
{
  "mappings": {
    "dynamic": "strict",
    "properties": {
      "@timestamp": {
        "type": "date"
      },
      "testing_ignored": {
        "properties": {
          "constant": {
            "type": "constant_keyword",
            "value": "constant_value"
          }
        }
      },
      "testing_regex": {
        "type": "constant_keyword",
        "value": "constant_value"
      },
      "normal_constant": {
        "type": "constant_keyword",
        "value": "constant_value"
      },
      "small_field": {
        "type": "keyword",
        "ignore_above": 10
      }
    }
  }
}

PUT constant-keywords-deleme/_doc/1
{
  "@timestamp": "2021-09-02T04:20:01.760Z"
}
```

Set in your `kibana.yml` the key/value of:

```yml
xpack.securitySolution.alertIgnoreFields: ['testing_ignored.constant', '/.*_regex/']
```

Setup a rule to run:
<img width="1083" alt="Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 10 23 23 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1151048/131781696-fea0d421-836f-465c-9be6-5289fbb622a4.png">

Once it runs you should notice that the constant values for testing are not on the signals table since it only typically exists in the fields API:
<img width="1166" alt="Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 10 26 16 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1151048/131781782-1684fb1d-bed9-4cf0-be9a-0abe1f0f34d1.png">

But the normal one still exists:
<img width="1136" alt="Screen Shot 2021-09-01 at 10 26 31 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1151048/131781827-5450c693-de9e-4285-b082-9f7a2cbd5d07.png">

If you change the `xpack.securitySolution.alertIgnoreFields` by removing it and re-generate the signals you will see these values added back.

### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)

# Conflicts:
#	src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/create_security_rule_type_factory.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/factories/utils/build_bulk_body.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/factories/wrap_hits_factory.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/indicator_match/create_indicator_match_alert_type.test.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/indicator_match/create_indicator_match_alert_type.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/ml/create_ml_alert_type.test.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/ml/create_ml_alert_type.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/query/create_query_alert_type.test.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/query/create_query_alert_type.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_types/types.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/build_bulk_body.test.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/build_bulk_body.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/signal_rule_alert_type.test.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/signal_rule_alert_type.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/wrap_hits_factory.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/signals/wrap_sequences_factory.ts
#	x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/plugin.ts
#	x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/index.ts
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad enabled auto-merge (squash) September 3, 2021 15:50
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad self-assigned this Sep 3, 2021
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @FrankHassanabad

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad merged commit ead4384 into elastic:7.14 Sep 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants