Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[5.x] Allow sorting and filtering on _type field #10311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2017
Merged

Conversation

elastic-jasper
Copy link
Contributor

Allow sorting and filtering on _type field

Backports PR #10254

Commit 1:
Add searchable and aggregatable to the filterable sortable calculation

Commit 2:
Account for fields that field stats knows are searchable even if their mappings don't include index:true

Commit 3:
Needed a new aggregatable but non-filterable example for this test

Commit 4:
Needed a new non-sortable example field as well

Commit 5:
Simplify sortable computation

Backports PR #10254

**Commit 1:**
Add searchable and aggregatable to the filterable sortable calculation

* Original sha: e1d3dae
* Authored by Matthew Bargar <[email protected]> on 2017-02-08T21:59:56Z

**Commit 2:**
Account for fields that field stats knows are searchable even if their mappings don't include index:true

* Original sha: 4e39c31
* Authored by Matthew Bargar <[email protected]> on 2017-02-08T22:05:48Z

**Commit 3:**
Needed a new aggregatable but non-filterable example for this test

* Original sha: 6362953
* Authored by Matthew Bargar <[email protected]> on 2017-02-09T21:58:11Z

**Commit 4:**
Needed a new non-sortable example field as well

* Original sha: 0f70647
* Authored by Matthew Bargar <[email protected]> on 2017-02-09T23:21:02Z

**Commit 5:**
Simplify sortable computation

* Original sha: 91dbc3e
* Authored by Matthew Bargar <[email protected]> on 2017-02-10T15:44:50Z
@Bargs
Copy link
Contributor

Bargs commented Feb 13, 2017

jenkins, test this

@Bargs Bargs merged commit 21754a0 into 5.x Feb 13, 2017
@epixa epixa deleted the jasper/backport/10254/5.x branch February 13, 2017 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants