Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solution] By default, the subject field is empty and the user is able to add the exception list. However, if we click on the field, it starts showing an error that the field can't be empty. And the user is unable to add the exception list #99597

Closed
muskangulati-qasource opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 16 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Rule Exceptions Security Solution Detection Rule Exceptions area fixed impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team:Security Solution Platform Security Solution Platform Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.6.0

Comments

@muskangulati-qasource
Copy link

Describe the feature
By default, the subject field is empty and the user is able to add the exception list. However, if we click on the field, it starts showing an error that the field can't be empty. And the user is unable to add the exception list

Build Details:

Version: 7.13.0-BC4
Commit: 5a6bad454ffe263aafed54cbd3f764253694bf37
Build number: 40749
Artifact: https://staging.elastic.co/7.13.0-5c4bc719/summary-7.13.0.html

Preconditions

  1. Elastic 7.13.0 environment should be deployed.
  2. Alerts should be generated( For eg, Mimikatz.exe)

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Navigate to the Detections tab under the Security
  2. Click on the three dots in front of the alert and click on add to the Endpoint exception

Test data
N/A

Impacted Test case(s)
N/A

Actual Result
By default, the subject field is empty and the user is able to add the exception list. However, if we click on the field, it starts showing an error that the field can't be empty. And the user is unable to add the exception list

Expected Result
If empty values are not allowed, the user should not be able to add the exception list value

What's Working
N/A

What's Not Working
N/A

Screenshot

  • By default:
    EndpointExceptionEmpty

  • If the user clicks on the empty box:
    EndpointException

@muskangulati-qasource muskangulati-qasource added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. labels May 10, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@muskangulati-qasource
Copy link
Author

@manishgupta-qasource please review !!

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-detections-response (Team:Detections and Resp)

@MadameSheema MadameSheema added impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. and removed triage_needed labels May 12, 2021
@arvindersingh-qasource-zz

Hi @MadameSheema ,

We have validated this ticket on 7.15.0 - SNAPSHOT build and found that issue is still occurring.

Build Details

Version:7.15.0 SNAPSHOT
Commit:f448fcd00b319a3be0d1a1ae356956446e4d7ef8
Build:43322

Please find below observations

1

Thanks.

@peluja1012 peluja1012 added Feature:Rule Exceptions Security Solution Detection Rule Exceptions area Team:Security Solution Platform Security Solution Platform Team labels Mar 18, 2022
@yctercero yctercero added fixed and removed bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience labels May 10, 2022
@yctercero
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like it was fixed a while back with this PR - #106685

@MadameSheema ready for QA check to then close out. Thank you!

@yctercero yctercero added the SecuritySolution:QAAssist Part of QA testing process for release label May 10, 2022
@yctercero yctercero self-assigned this May 10, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 3, 2022

Hi @MadameSheema @yctercero,

  • We have validated above issue on 8.3.0 BC2 and and found that it's still occurring 🔴.

Build info:

Version: 8.3.0 BC2
Build: 53231
Commit: 25476b531ba9f32292bde85508d342aa5e1c29eb
  • By default:

image

  • If the user clicks on the empty box:

image

Thanks!

@yctercero
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @prachigupta-qasource - I'll add this back into our 8.4 plan.

@yctercero yctercero added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience v8.4.0 and removed fixed v8.3.0 labels Jun 3, 2022
@yctercero yctercero added v8.5.0 and removed v8.4.0 labels Aug 10, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 30, 2022

Hi @yctercero

We are seeing QAAssist Label on this ticket also Glo has shared one GitHub filter according to that we have to create test-plan and this ticket is present under that . So please let us known if we need to create test-case of it or do we need to regress only.

Thanks !

@yctercero
Copy link
Contributor

Hi - looks like the fix I put in was only partial fix so it still needs to be addressed and then tested out once fix is in. So far it's slated for 8.5.

@peluja1012
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @prachigupta-qasource, This was fixed by #143127. Could you please retest when you get a chance?

@muskangulati-qasource
Copy link
Author

Hi Team,

We are blocked to test this issue as we are unable to get alerts from the Windows Endpoint.

So once, the issue for installation is fixed, we will retest this issue and post our observations.

Thanks!!

@kevinlog
Copy link
Contributor

@muskangulati-qasource

Can you try to run the Windows Endpoint on a Windows VM with Test Signing turned OFF? It looks like you will be able to install the Endpoint using that workaround until the signing build issue is resolved.

See @karanbirsingh-qasource comment right here.

I think we can verify this bug using the above workaround. Let me know if you have any questions

@muskangulati-qasource
Copy link
Author

Hi Team,

We have this issue on the latest 8.6 BC4 and found the issue is ** partially fixed**. 🟤

Please find below the testing details:

Build Details

Version: 8.6.0 BC4
BUILD: 58612
COMMIT: 218162f282314db5b3833c84752dd24395949b3f

Observations

  • The Subject field is empty by default
  • If we click on the subject field, it still generates an error and user is not able to add the entry
  • If user changes value in any other field, the subject field is reset to default and the error message is also gone.

Screen Recording

Exception.mp4

Please let us know if anything else is required from our end.

Thanks!!

@MadameSheema
Copy link
Member

@dhurley14 @peluja1012 may you please take a look at the above? Thanks!

@MadameSheema
Copy link
Member

@dhurley14 @peluja1012 any update on the above?

@ghost ghost removed fixed SecuritySolution:QAAssist Part of QA testing process for release labels Dec 26, 2022
@cybersecdiva
Copy link

Tested in current 8.7.0 deployment:

Preconditions:

  • Endpoint alerts should be generated

Steps to reproduce behavior:

  1. Navigate to Security -> Alerts
  2. Filter Alerts by Rule name and select Malware Detection Alert
  3. Once the Rule event Malware Detection Alert displays, Click on the the dots and select Add Endpoint Exception

Results:

The subject_name field automatically populates the field value with the host, in this case Microsoft WindowsThe field value is not empty and no error message is displayed

Expected results:

No error message is displayed

Screen video capture:

Bug_.subject_name.field.empty.value.for.add.endpoint.exception.mp4

Observations:

  • The subject_name field is populated by default with the host as the field value
  • There are no error messages that display

Screenshots:

Screenshot 2023-04-13 at 5 12 37 PM

Conclusion:

Validated that this is fixed ✅ in the UI for 8.7.0 and closing this case.

cc: @MadameSheema @yctercero @peluja1012 Update FYI Observations

@cybersecdiva cybersecdiva added fixed QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA labels Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Rule Exceptions Security Solution Detection Rule Exceptions area fixed impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. QA:Validated Issue has been validated by QA Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team:Security Solution Platform Security Solution Platform Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.6.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants