Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[APM] Latency correlations: Show fewer y-axis labels and use unit label for the chart #102990

Closed
formgeist opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

[APM] Latency correlations: Show fewer y-axis labels and use unit label for the chart #102990

formgeist opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@qn895
Labels
apm:correlations enhancement New value added to drive a business result :ml Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support

Comments

@formgeist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Moved over from the meta issue: #102499

  1. We should limit the number of values we show in the y-axis in order to show the log distribution better.
  2. Use "transactions" or "trans." as a unit label for the y-axis values.

image
@formgeist formgeist added Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support enhancement New value added to drive a business result :ml apm:correlations labels Jun 22, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:apm)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui (:ml)

@formgeist formgeist mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2021
Closed
@qn895 qn895 mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2021
Merged
11 tasks
@qn895 qn895 self-assigned this Jul 8, 2021
@qn895
Copy link
Member

qn895 commented Jul 8, 2021

Closing via #99905

@qn895 qn895 closed this as completed Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@qn895 qn895

Labels
apm:correlations enhancement New value added to drive a business result :ml Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@graphaelli @sorenlouv @formgeist @elasticmachine @qn895