-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[EuiSuperDatePicker] Allow passing canRoundRelativeUnits={false}
, which turns off relative unit rounding
#7502
Merged
cee-chen
merged 5 commits into
elastic:main
from
cee-chen:super-date-picker/relative-units
Feb 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5e2c091
Set up new `preferLargerRelativeUnits` prop
cee-chen 91872a8
Update pretty duration utils to accept `preferLargerRelativeUnits`
cee-chen 312815e
Add final tests with event/user behavior
cee-chen 64b0fab
changelog
cee-chen 489c100
[PR feedback] naming: final_FINAL_v4.docx
cee-chen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
- Updated `EuiSuperDatePicker` with a new `preferLargerRelativeUnits` prop, which defaults to true (current behavior). To preserve displaying the unit that users select, set this to false. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This prop name might be a bit unclear. What do you think of renaming it to
relativeUnitRounding
as in the title of this PR? :D I think including the word "rounding" makes it easier to search for when you see that rounding behavior and want to do something about itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, that does sound way better. Let's go with that!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, hm, does making it a verb sound better to you at all, out of curiosity?
roundRelativeUnits={false}
vsrelativeUnitRounding={false}
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or yet another thought: if we want to follow
is/has/can/shouldX
naming convention style for booleans, we could docanRoundRelativeUnits
, but now we're getting back into the original verbose var name territory lmaoThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To recap our Slack discussion: We went with
canRoundRelativeUnits
for clearer boolean naming.roundRelativeUnits
as a verb feels like it would take a callback rather than a boolean, so we avoided that (unless we someday want to do one of those union types that Tomasz hates so much, likeFunction | boolean
🤣)Also our next datepicker component will definitely be named EuiSuperDuperDatePicker.