Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.6] Skip ancient closed indices in desired balance (#91765) #91768

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2022

Conversation

DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 8.6:

This assertion fails in the presence of pre-7.2.0 closed indices because
such indices don't even have routing table entries.

Relates elastic#33888 Closes elastic#91470
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner added :Distributed Coordination/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Distributed Meta label for distributed team (obsolete) labels Nov 21, 2022
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 166247f into elastic:8.6 Nov 21, 2022
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner deleted the backport/8.6/pr-91765 branch November 21, 2022 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport :Distributed Coordination/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) Team:Distributed Meta label for distributed team (obsolete) >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v8.6.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants