Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.7] [DOCS] Modifies link that points to .NET client page. (#90229) #90231

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2022

Conversation

szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 7.7:

@szabosteve szabosteve added >docs General docs changes backport Team:Docs Meta label for docs team labels Sep 22, 2022
@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticsearchmachine test this please

@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gtback Could you please help me with this one? 🙏 The docs-check fails with no apparent connection to this PR. I would need to merge this PR to unblock this: elastic/elasticsearch-net#6658. It would be great if you could take a look when the time permits. Thank you in advance!

@gtback
Copy link
Member

gtback commented Sep 22, 2022

👋🏻 Hey @szabosteve . elasticsearch-ci/docs-check has nothing to do with the the elastic/docs repo.

@mark-vieira is the one who wrote and maintains this job. My guess is that because the 7.7 branch is so old that it might be outdated and it's fine to just merge this, but I'd like to get confirmation from Mark first if possible.

@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gtback Thanks for the clarification! I didn't know about it! I'll wait for confirmation from @mark-vieira then.

@szabosteve szabosteve merged commit 2f24886 into elastic:7.7 Sep 26, 2022
@szabosteve szabosteve deleted the backport/7.7/pr-90229 branch September 26, 2022 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport >docs General docs changes Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v7.7.2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants